{"title":"Visual field area in phakic, aphakic, and pseudophakic individuals.","authors":"L Lazarus, T D Williams","doi":"10.1097/00006324-198807000-00011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Goldmann perimetry was done on 11 pseudophakic subjects and results were compared to those of age-matched phakic subjects and a third group of aphakic individuals who were wearing rigid gas permeable contact lenses. Testing showed that the I-3 and I-4 fields of the subjects who had had cataract surgery were generally constricted when compared to the normal phakic population. Possible explanations for this include media clarity not being as important a factor in determining field size as was previously thought, peripheral retinal changes, and implant material affecting contrast sensitivity.</p>","PeriodicalId":7700,"journal":{"name":"American journal of optometry and physiological optics","volume":"65 7","pages":"593-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1988-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1097/00006324-198807000-00011","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of optometry and physiological optics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/00006324-198807000-00011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8
Abstract
Goldmann perimetry was done on 11 pseudophakic subjects and results were compared to those of age-matched phakic subjects and a third group of aphakic individuals who were wearing rigid gas permeable contact lenses. Testing showed that the I-3 and I-4 fields of the subjects who had had cataract surgery were generally constricted when compared to the normal phakic population. Possible explanations for this include media clarity not being as important a factor in determining field size as was previously thought, peripheral retinal changes, and implant material affecting contrast sensitivity.