Health-related quality of life scale specific to pregnant women (PregQOL): Development and psychometric evaluation

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING Midwifery Pub Date : 2025-02-06 DOI:10.1016/j.midw.2025.104329
Hyunjeong Shin , Songi Jeon , Inhae Cho
{"title":"Health-related quality of life scale specific to pregnant women (PregQOL): Development and psychometric evaluation","authors":"Hyunjeong Shin ,&nbsp;Songi Jeon ,&nbsp;Inhae Cho","doi":"10.1016/j.midw.2025.104329","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Problem</h3><div>According to systematic literature reviews, most studies measured pregnant women's quality of life using generic measures.</div></div><div><h3>Background</h3><div>Condition-specific questionnaires are more sensitive and responsive than generic questionnaires. There is a great need to establish specific measures for assessing pregnant women's health-related quality of life considering their unique experiences of pregnancy.</div></div><div><h3>Aim</h3><div>To develop and test psychometric properties of the PregQOL, a health-related quality of life measure specific to pregnant women.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>To construct the items of the PregQOL, we conducted semi-structured face-to-face interviews with five pregnant women in addition to an extensive literature review. For psychometric testing, data were collected with a convenience sample of 411 pregnant women. Construct validity was assessed via exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses. Convergent and known-groups validity were evaluated. Internal consistency reliability was studied using Cronbach's alpha and McDonald's omega. Test-retest reliability was examined.</div></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><div>After evaluation of content validity and exploratory/confirmatory factor analysis, the 24-item PregQOL was developed with four dimensions: <em>daily functioning, supportive conditions, adaptation to pregnancy, and psychological well-being.</em> It demonstrated convergent validity with relations to a quality of life measure for general population. Known-groups validity was supported by significant differences between the depressed and non-depressed groups. The scale demonstrated adequate internal consistency and test-retest reliability. It also showed good reliability across three trimesters of pregnancy.</div></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><div>The newly developed PregQOL demonstrated good psychometric properties across three trimesters of pregnancy.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The PregQOL might be useful for helping midwives and other healthcare providers understand the overall well-being of pregnant women.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":18495,"journal":{"name":"Midwifery","volume":"143 ","pages":"Article 104329"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Midwifery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0266613825000488","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Problem

According to systematic literature reviews, most studies measured pregnant women's quality of life using generic measures.

Background

Condition-specific questionnaires are more sensitive and responsive than generic questionnaires. There is a great need to establish specific measures for assessing pregnant women's health-related quality of life considering their unique experiences of pregnancy.

Aim

To develop and test psychometric properties of the PregQOL, a health-related quality of life measure specific to pregnant women.

Methods

To construct the items of the PregQOL, we conducted semi-structured face-to-face interviews with five pregnant women in addition to an extensive literature review. For psychometric testing, data were collected with a convenience sample of 411 pregnant women. Construct validity was assessed via exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses. Convergent and known-groups validity were evaluated. Internal consistency reliability was studied using Cronbach's alpha and McDonald's omega. Test-retest reliability was examined.

Findings

After evaluation of content validity and exploratory/confirmatory factor analysis, the 24-item PregQOL was developed with four dimensions: daily functioning, supportive conditions, adaptation to pregnancy, and psychological well-being. It demonstrated convergent validity with relations to a quality of life measure for general population. Known-groups validity was supported by significant differences between the depressed and non-depressed groups. The scale demonstrated adequate internal consistency and test-retest reliability. It also showed good reliability across three trimesters of pregnancy.

Discussion

The newly developed PregQOL demonstrated good psychometric properties across three trimesters of pregnancy.

Conclusion

The PregQOL might be useful for helping midwives and other healthcare providers understand the overall well-being of pregnant women.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
孕妇健康相关生活质量量表(PregQOL):发展与心理测量评估
问题:根据系统的文献综述,大多数研究使用通用的测量方法来测量孕妇的生活质量。背景:特定条件调查问卷比一般调查问卷更敏感,反应更迅速。考虑到孕妇独特的怀孕经历,非常需要制定具体措施来评估她们与健康有关的生活质量。目的开发和测试孕妇健康相关生活质量指标PregQOL的心理测量特性。方法在广泛查阅文献的基础上,对5名孕妇进行半结构化的面对面访谈,构建妊娠生活质量量表。为了进行心理测试,我们收集了411名孕妇作为方便样本。通过探索性和验证性因素分析来评估结构效度。评估收敛效度和已知组效度。采用Cronbach's α和McDonald's ω研究内部一致性信度。检验了重测信度。结果经内容效度评估和探索性/验证性因子分析,编制了包含日常功能、支持条件、妊娠适应和心理健康四个维度的24项妊娠生活质量量表。它证明了与一般人群生活质量测量的关系的收敛有效性。已知组效度在抑郁组和非抑郁组之间有显著差异。量表具有足够的内部一致性和重测信度。它在怀孕的三个月里也显示出良好的可靠性。新开发的PregQOL在妊娠三个月期间显示出良好的心理测量特性。结论妊娠生活质量可以帮助助产士和其他医疗服务提供者了解孕妇的整体健康状况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Midwifery
Midwifery 医学-护理
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
7.40%
发文量
221
审稿时长
13.4 weeks
期刊介绍: Midwifery publishes the latest peer reviewed international research to inform the safety, quality, outcomes and experiences of pregnancy, birth and maternity care for childbearing women, their babies and families. The journal’s publications support midwives and maternity care providers to explore and develop their knowledge, skills and attitudes informed by best available evidence. Midwifery provides an international, interdisciplinary forum for the publication, dissemination and discussion of advances in evidence, controversies and current research, and promotes continuing education through publication of systematic and other scholarly reviews and updates. Midwifery articles cover the cultural, clinical, psycho-social, sociological, epidemiological, education, managerial, workforce, organizational and technological areas of practice in preconception, maternal and infant care. The journal welcomes the highest quality scholarly research that employs rigorous methodology. Midwifery is a leading international journal in midwifery and maternal health with a current impact factor of 1.861 (© Thomson Reuters Journal Citation Reports 2016) and employs a double-blind peer review process.
期刊最新文献
Delayed initiation of antenatal care and its determinants in Ethiopia: A systematic review and meta-analysis The effect of a brief audio-guided self-hypnosis intervention on fear of childbirth during normal delivery: A non-randomised controlled trial When hope is broken: A qualitative study of women's quality of life after late miscarriage or foetal loss Corrigendum to "Dietary management in the first stage of labor: A scoping review"[Midwifery144 (2025) 104343]. Corrigendum to "Spheres of influence on contraceptive decision-making: qualitative interviews with postpartum mothers and providers" [Midwifery 152 (2026) #104665].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1