Japan society of clinical oncology position paper on appropriate clinical use of molecular residual disease (MRD) testing.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY International Journal of Clinical Oncology Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-07 DOI:10.1007/s10147-024-02683-0
Shin Kobayashi, Yoshiaki Nakamura, Tadayoshi Hashimoto, Hideaki Bando, Eiji Oki, Takahiro Karasaki, Hidehito Horinouchi, Yukinori Ozaki, Hiroji Iwata, Taigo Kato, Hideaki Miyake, Akihiro Ohba, Masafumi Ikeda, Tatsuyuki Chiyoda, Kosei Hasegawa, Takao Fujisawa, Kazuto Matsuura, Kenjiro Namikawa, Shugo Yajima, Takayuki Yoshino, Kiyoshi Hasegawa
{"title":"Japan society of clinical oncology position paper on appropriate clinical use of molecular residual disease (MRD) testing.","authors":"Shin Kobayashi, Yoshiaki Nakamura, Tadayoshi Hashimoto, Hideaki Bando, Eiji Oki, Takahiro Karasaki, Hidehito Horinouchi, Yukinori Ozaki, Hiroji Iwata, Taigo Kato, Hideaki Miyake, Akihiro Ohba, Masafumi Ikeda, Tatsuyuki Chiyoda, Kosei Hasegawa, Takao Fujisawa, Kazuto Matsuura, Kenjiro Namikawa, Shugo Yajima, Takayuki Yoshino, Kiyoshi Hasegawa","doi":"10.1007/s10147-024-02683-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Although the 5-year relative survival rates for resectable solid tumors have improved over the past few years, the risk of postoperative recurrence necessitates effective monitoring strategies. Recent advancements in molecular residual disease (MRD) testing based on circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) analysis have shown considerable promise in the context of predicting recurrence; however, significant barriers to widespread clinical implementation remain-mainly, low awareness among healthcare professionals, high costs, and lack of standardized assays and comprehensive evidence. This position paper, led by the Japan Society of Clinical Oncology, aims to establish a common framework for the appropriate clinical use of MRD testing in a tumor type-agnostic manner. It synthesizes currently available evidence, reviews region-specific clinical trends, addresses critical clinical questions related to MRD testing, and offers recommendations to guide healthcare professionals, biotechnology and pharmaceutical companies, and regulatory authorities. These recommendations were developed based on a voting process involving 15 expert members, ensuring a consensus-driven approach. These findings underscore the importance of collaborative efforts among various stakeholders in enhancing the clinical utility of MRD testing. This project aimed to foster consensus and provide clear guidelines to support the advancement of precision medicine in oncology and improve patient outcomes in the context of perioperative care.</p>","PeriodicalId":13869,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Clinical Oncology","volume":" ","pages":"605-654"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11946966/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Clinical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10147-024-02683-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Although the 5-year relative survival rates for resectable solid tumors have improved over the past few years, the risk of postoperative recurrence necessitates effective monitoring strategies. Recent advancements in molecular residual disease (MRD) testing based on circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) analysis have shown considerable promise in the context of predicting recurrence; however, significant barriers to widespread clinical implementation remain-mainly, low awareness among healthcare professionals, high costs, and lack of standardized assays and comprehensive evidence. This position paper, led by the Japan Society of Clinical Oncology, aims to establish a common framework for the appropriate clinical use of MRD testing in a tumor type-agnostic manner. It synthesizes currently available evidence, reviews region-specific clinical trends, addresses critical clinical questions related to MRD testing, and offers recommendations to guide healthcare professionals, biotechnology and pharmaceutical companies, and regulatory authorities. These recommendations were developed based on a voting process involving 15 expert members, ensuring a consensus-driven approach. These findings underscore the importance of collaborative efforts among various stakeholders in enhancing the clinical utility of MRD testing. This project aimed to foster consensus and provide clear guidelines to support the advancement of precision medicine in oncology and improve patient outcomes in the context of perioperative care.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
日本临床肿瘤学会关于适当临床使用分子残留病(MRD)检测的立场文件。
虽然可切除实体瘤的5年相对生存率在过去几年中有所提高,但术后复发的风险需要有效的监测策略。基于循环肿瘤DNA (ctDNA)分析的分子残留病(MRD)检测的最新进展在预测复发方面显示出相当大的希望;然而,广泛的临床应用仍然存在重大障碍,主要是卫生保健专业人员的认识低,成本高,缺乏标准化的分析和全面的证据。该立场文件由日本临床肿瘤学会(Japan Society of Clinical Oncology)牵头,旨在建立一个通用框架,以便在肿瘤类型不确定的情况下,适当地在临床使用MRD检测。它综合了目前可用的证据,审查了特定区域的临床趋势,解决了与MRD测试相关的关键临床问题,并提供了指导医疗保健专业人员、生物技术和制药公司以及监管机构的建议。这些建议是根据15名专家成员参与的投票程序制定的,确保采用协商一致的方式。这些发现强调了各利益相关方在提高MRD检测临床应用方面合作努力的重要性。该项目旨在促进共识,并提供明确的指导方针,以支持肿瘤精准医学的进步,并在围手术期护理的背景下改善患者的预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
3.00%
发文量
175
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Clinical Oncology (IJCO) welcomes original research papers on all aspects of clinical oncology that report the results of novel and timely investigations. Reports on clinical trials are encouraged. Experimental studies will also be accepted if they have obvious relevance to clinical oncology. Membership in the Japan Society of Clinical Oncology is not a prerequisite for submission to the journal. Papers are received on the understanding that: their contents have not been published in whole or in part elsewhere; that they are subject to peer review by at least two referees and the Editors, and to editorial revision of the language and contents; and that the Editors are responsible for their acceptance, rejection, and order of publication.
期刊最新文献
Comparative efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitor-based regimens versus tyrosine kinase inhibitors in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma stratified by etiology: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Local treatment for metastatic and primary sites in metastatic renal cell carcinoma in the combination immunotherapy era: a narrative review. Online peer support for breast cancer survivors: protocol for a decentralized multicenter open-label pilot randomized controlled trial (HOPE-BC study). Prevention of hepatitis B virus reactivation according to hepatitis B surface antigen status in patients receiving systemic chemotherapy in Japan using an electronic medical record database. Modified EXTREME regimen versus modified TPEx regimen as first-line treatment for recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: a multicenter, open-label, randomized, exploratory study (TEMPER study).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1