A service evaluation assessing the root canal referral and treatment pathway within the Royal London Dental Hospital

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE British Dental Journal Pub Date : 2025-02-07 DOI:10.1038/s41415-024-7841-6
James Wootton, Millie Forrest, Mitul Patel, Naren Thanabalan, Mital Patel
{"title":"A service evaluation assessing the root canal referral and treatment pathway within the Royal London Dental Hospital","authors":"James Wootton, Millie Forrest, Mitul Patel, Naren Thanabalan, Mital Patel","doi":"10.1038/s41415-024-7841-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim Within the National Health Service (NHS) England, dental hospitals are tasked with assessing and managing complex root canal treatments (RCTs) referred from various service providers. The aim of this service evaluation was to investigate the root canal treatment and retreatment (RCreT) output, case complexity designation and referral pathways to the Royal London Dental Hospital. Methods Data were collected and analysed on non-surgical RCTs completed between 1 April 2021 to 31 March 2022, including the number of completed treatments, reason and origin of referrals, referral-to-treatment timelines and complexity of treatments. Results In total, 339 teeth met the inclusion criteria, with external referrals (n = 198) taking an average of 47 weeks from referral to treatment commencement compared to 16 weeks for internal referrals (n = 141). Maxillary incisors and first permanent molars were most commonly referred, with anatomical challenges (33.5%), RCreT (32.2%) and trauma (18%) being the most common reasons. Treatment was completed within an average of 2.7 appointments, with a high proportion of complexity Level 2 and 3 cases being completed. Conclusions The RCT output was shown to be increasing within the service. External referrals are taking longer to be seen and treated compared to NHS targets and internally referred patients; although, further information is needed to understand the exact cause of this. Allocation of treatment complexity appeared to be in line with the clinician''s skill set and experience level, taking an average of 2.7 appointments to complete treatment. Further information on the number of referrals, available consultations and clinic space would provide additional insight into the efficiency and pressures of the service.","PeriodicalId":9229,"journal":{"name":"British Dental Journal","volume":"238 3","pages":"1-6"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Dental Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s41415-024-7841-6","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim Within the National Health Service (NHS) England, dental hospitals are tasked with assessing and managing complex root canal treatments (RCTs) referred from various service providers. The aim of this service evaluation was to investigate the root canal treatment and retreatment (RCreT) output, case complexity designation and referral pathways to the Royal London Dental Hospital. Methods Data were collected and analysed on non-surgical RCTs completed between 1 April 2021 to 31 March 2022, including the number of completed treatments, reason and origin of referrals, referral-to-treatment timelines and complexity of treatments. Results In total, 339 teeth met the inclusion criteria, with external referrals (n = 198) taking an average of 47 weeks from referral to treatment commencement compared to 16 weeks for internal referrals (n = 141). Maxillary incisors and first permanent molars were most commonly referred, with anatomical challenges (33.5%), RCreT (32.2%) and trauma (18%) being the most common reasons. Treatment was completed within an average of 2.7 appointments, with a high proportion of complexity Level 2 and 3 cases being completed. Conclusions The RCT output was shown to be increasing within the service. External referrals are taking longer to be seen and treated compared to NHS targets and internally referred patients; although, further information is needed to understand the exact cause of this. Allocation of treatment complexity appeared to be in line with the clinician''s skill set and experience level, taking an average of 2.7 appointments to complete treatment. Further information on the number of referrals, available consultations and clinic space would provide additional insight into the efficiency and pressures of the service.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
服务评估评估根管转诊和治疗途径在皇家伦敦牙科医院。
目的在英国国民健康服务体系(NHS)内,牙科医院的任务是评估和管理来自各种服务提供者的复杂根管治疗(rct)。这项服务评估的目的是调查根管治疗和再治疗(RCreT)输出、病例复杂性指定和转到皇家伦敦牙科医院的途径。方法收集和分析2021年4月1日至2022年3月31日完成的非手术随机对照试验的数据,包括完成治疗的次数、转诊的原因和来源、转诊到治疗的时间表和治疗的复杂性。结果339颗牙符合纳入标准,其中外部转诊198例(平均47周)至开始治疗,而内部转诊141例(平均16周)。上颌门牙和第一恒磨牙最常被提及,解剖学挑战(33.5%),RCreT(32.2%)和创伤(18%)是最常见的原因。治疗平均在2.7次预约内完成,复杂性2级和3级病例完成的比例很高。结论该服务的RCT输出呈上升趋势。与NHS目标和内部转诊患者相比,外部转诊需要更长的时间才能看到和治疗;虽然,需要进一步的信息来了解这种情况的确切原因。治疗复杂性的分配似乎与临床医生的技能和经验水平一致,平均需要2.7次预约才能完成治疗。关于转诊人数、现有会诊和诊所空间的进一步资料将有助于进一步了解该服务的效率和压力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
British Dental Journal
British Dental Journal 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
15.40%
发文量
1096
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The role of the BDJ is to inform its readers of ideas, opinions, developments and key issues in dentistry - clinical, practical and scientific - stimulating interest, debate and discussion amongst dentists of all disciplines. All papers published in the BDJ are subject to rigorous peer review.
期刊最新文献
All smiles are equal but some smiles are more equal than others: oral health inequalities in socially vulnerable groups across the UK Expert View: Jenny Gallagher Restorative emergence angles Life cycle assessment of the complete denture fabrication process using traditional impressions versus intra-oral scanning The UK Standing Dental Advisory Committee (1948-2010) with special reference to its Expert Working Party on Orthodontics, 1992
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1