Dynamic photoelastic analysis of stress distribution in simulated canals using different heat-treated flat-side rotary instruments.

IF 3.1 2区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Clinical Oral Investigations Pub Date : 2025-02-08 DOI:10.1007/s00784-025-06193-9
Kleber Kildare Teodoro de Carvalho, Paulo Takeji Moriya, Anil Kishen, Jorge N R Martins, Emmanuel João Nogueira Leal Silva, Murilo P Alcalde, Francisco Manuel Braz Fernandes, Erick Miranda Souza, Marco Aurélio Versiani
{"title":"Dynamic photoelastic analysis of stress distribution in simulated canals using different heat-treated flat-side rotary instruments.","authors":"Kleber Kildare Teodoro de Carvalho, Paulo Takeji Moriya, Anil Kishen, Jorge N R Martins, Emmanuel João Nogueira Leal Silva, Murilo P Alcalde, Francisco Manuel Braz Fernandes, Erick Miranda Souza, Marco Aurélio Versiani","doi":"10.1007/s00784-025-06193-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to compare the stress produced by three heat-treated flat-side prototype rotary instruments and a non-flat side instrument on the internal walls of simulated canals with three different curvature degrees using the photoelastic technique.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Thirty-six resin blocks with simulated canals, comprising three curvature types (45°, 60°, and double curvature), were used in the study, with 12 blocks allocated to each curvature type. These blocks were further divided into four experimental groups (n = 9 per group) based on the heat treatment of the instruments: gold, silver, blue, and a control group with non-flat-side gold instruments. The blocks were analyzed using a circular polariscope setup, with real-time birefringence patterns captured by a digital camera. Stress on canal walls was evaluated using a semi-quantitative scale. Supplementary tests (stereomicroscope, SEM, energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy, and DSC) were performed to interpret the results further. Data were analyzed using the Kruskal-Wallis test (α = 5%).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Inter- and intra-observer agreements were 0.91 and 1, respectively. All instruments exhibited high stress patterns on canal walls. The highest stress was observed in the 45° and 60° blocks (middle third) and the double curvature blocks (apical third). The flat-side gold instrument recorded the highest stress in the coronal third, and the flat-side blue in the apical third (p < 0.05). All instruments displayed some degree of distortion after use.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Instrument type and canal curvature significantly influenced stress distribution across root canal thirds. All flat-side instruments exhibited high stress patterns, warranting caution in curved canals due to potential distortion and performance impact.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>This study recommended caution when using newly designed flat-side instruments in curved canals due to potential stress on canal walls and greater distortion, which may affect performance and durability.</p>","PeriodicalId":10461,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Oral Investigations","volume":"29 2","pages":"122"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Oral Investigations","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-025-06193-9","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: This study aimed to compare the stress produced by three heat-treated flat-side prototype rotary instruments and a non-flat side instrument on the internal walls of simulated canals with three different curvature degrees using the photoelastic technique.

Materials and methods: Thirty-six resin blocks with simulated canals, comprising three curvature types (45°, 60°, and double curvature), were used in the study, with 12 blocks allocated to each curvature type. These blocks were further divided into four experimental groups (n = 9 per group) based on the heat treatment of the instruments: gold, silver, blue, and a control group with non-flat-side gold instruments. The blocks were analyzed using a circular polariscope setup, with real-time birefringence patterns captured by a digital camera. Stress on canal walls was evaluated using a semi-quantitative scale. Supplementary tests (stereomicroscope, SEM, energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy, and DSC) were performed to interpret the results further. Data were analyzed using the Kruskal-Wallis test (α = 5%).

Results: Inter- and intra-observer agreements were 0.91 and 1, respectively. All instruments exhibited high stress patterns on canal walls. The highest stress was observed in the 45° and 60° blocks (middle third) and the double curvature blocks (apical third). The flat-side gold instrument recorded the highest stress in the coronal third, and the flat-side blue in the apical third (p < 0.05). All instruments displayed some degree of distortion after use.

Conclusions: Instrument type and canal curvature significantly influenced stress distribution across root canal thirds. All flat-side instruments exhibited high stress patterns, warranting caution in curved canals due to potential distortion and performance impact.

Clinical relevance: This study recommended caution when using newly designed flat-side instruments in curved canals due to potential stress on canal walls and greater distortion, which may affect performance and durability.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不同热处理平侧旋转仪器模拟管道应力分布的动态光弹性分析。
目的:利用光弹性技术比较三种热处理平侧旋转器械和非平侧旋转器械在三种不同曲率度的模拟根管内壁上产生的应力。材料和方法:研究中使用了36个树脂块模拟管道,包括三种曲率类型(45°,60°和双曲率),每种曲率类型分配12个块。根据仪器的热处理情况,将这些块进一步分为四个实验组(每组n = 9):金色,银色,蓝色和非平面金色仪器的对照组。使用圆形偏光镜装置对这些块进行分析,并使用数码相机捕获实时双折射模式。采用半定量量表对运河壁面应力进行评估。补充测试(体视显微镜、扫描电镜、能量色散x射线光谱和DSC)进一步解释结果。数据采用Kruskal-Wallis检验(α = 5%)。结果:观察者之间和观察者内部的一致性分别为0.91和1。所有仪器在运河壁上都显示出高应力模式。在45°和60°块(中间三分之一)和双曲率块(顶端三分之一)处观察到最大应力。平侧金色根管在冠状三分之一处应力最大,平侧蓝色根管在根尖三分之一处应力最大(p)。所有平侧仪器都表现出高应力模式,由于潜在的扭曲和性能影响,在弯曲的管道中需要谨慎。临床相关性:本研究建议在弯曲管中使用新设计的平侧器械时要谨慎,因为平侧器械对管壁有潜在的应力和更大的变形,可能影响其性能和耐用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Oral Investigations
Clinical Oral Investigations 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
5.90%
发文量
484
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The journal Clinical Oral Investigations is a multidisciplinary, international forum for publication of research from all fields of oral medicine. The journal publishes original scientific articles and invited reviews which provide up-to-date results of basic and clinical studies in oral and maxillofacial science and medicine. The aim is to clarify the relevance of new results to modern practice, for an international readership. Coverage includes maxillofacial and oral surgery, prosthetics and restorative dentistry, operative dentistry, endodontics, periodontology, orthodontics, dental materials science, clinical trials, epidemiology, pedodontics, oral implant, preventive dentistiry, oral pathology, oral basic sciences and more.
期刊最新文献
Timing and extent of Peri-Implant bone loss for dental implant removal: A retrospective Cross-Sectional analysis. Prognostic factors and cervical lymph node management in tongue squamous cell carcinoma: a retrospective cohort study. Maintenance of physicochemical, optical, and biological properties of conventional glass ionomer cement enriched with an anacardic acid-derivative compound. Clinical outcomes of digital straightwire lingual versus labial fixed appliances assessed with American Board of Orthodontics indices: a retrospective cohort study. Correction to: Three-dimensional assessment of tooth movements in clear aligner treatment of moderate and severe crowding.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1