{"title":"Clinical utility of non-gated 4-minute delayed dual-energy computed tomography for myocardial extracellular volume quantification.","authors":"Tsukasa Kojima, Yuzo Yamasaki, Daisuke Nishigake, Takashi Shirasaka, Masatoshi Kondo, Kazuhito Hioki, Takeshi Kamitani, Toyoyuki Kato, Kousei Ishigami","doi":"10.1093/bjr/tqaf022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To develop and validate the myocardial extracellular volume (ECV) obtained from non-electrocardiography (ECG)-gated delayed CT images acquired 4 minutes post-contrast infusion (4-min-nonECG-ECV) compared with the ECV obtained from ECG-gated delayed CT images acquired 10 min post-contrast infusion (Conv-ECV).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively analysed 29 patients (males: 21) after a comprehensive CT protocol of both 4-min-nonECG-ECV and Conv-ECV on a dual-layer CT scanner. The mean volume of contrast medium administered: 90 ± 11.8 mL, the average heart rate during the CT examinations: 74.2 ± 18.2 bpm. Two independent observers calculated the respective 4-min-nonECG-ECV and Conv-ECV. We determined the correlation between the ECV obtained by the two methods and conducted a Bland-Altman analysis to identify systematic errors and determine the limits of agreement (LOA) between the 4-min-nonECG-ECV and Conv-ECV values.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The respective median ECV values for observer 1 were 27.3 for 4-min-nonECG-ECV and 26.5 for Conv-ECV; for observer 2, they were 27.8 and 27.1. The correlation between the methods was 0.97 for both observers (p < 0.01). The Bland-Altman plots for observers 1 and 2 demonstrated a minor bias (-0.2% and -0.5%, respectively), with the 95% LOA ranges at - 4.4%-4.0% and -5.0%-4.0%, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The 4-min-nonECG-ECV provided ECV values comparable to those obtained by Conv-ECV.</p><p><strong>Advances in knowledge: </strong>Myocardial ECV quantification is feasible using a non-gated, 4-minute delayed dual-energy CT scan with an already established CT acquisition method. This approach achieves ECV accuracy comparable to that of the conventional CT-ECV calculation method (gated 10-minute delayed imaging) while enhancing clinical efficacy and diagnostic throughput.</p>","PeriodicalId":9306,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/bjr/tqaf022","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: To develop and validate the myocardial extracellular volume (ECV) obtained from non-electrocardiography (ECG)-gated delayed CT images acquired 4 minutes post-contrast infusion (4-min-nonECG-ECV) compared with the ECV obtained from ECG-gated delayed CT images acquired 10 min post-contrast infusion (Conv-ECV).
Methods: We retrospectively analysed 29 patients (males: 21) after a comprehensive CT protocol of both 4-min-nonECG-ECV and Conv-ECV on a dual-layer CT scanner. The mean volume of contrast medium administered: 90 ± 11.8 mL, the average heart rate during the CT examinations: 74.2 ± 18.2 bpm. Two independent observers calculated the respective 4-min-nonECG-ECV and Conv-ECV. We determined the correlation between the ECV obtained by the two methods and conducted a Bland-Altman analysis to identify systematic errors and determine the limits of agreement (LOA) between the 4-min-nonECG-ECV and Conv-ECV values.
Results: The respective median ECV values for observer 1 were 27.3 for 4-min-nonECG-ECV and 26.5 for Conv-ECV; for observer 2, they were 27.8 and 27.1. The correlation between the methods was 0.97 for both observers (p < 0.01). The Bland-Altman plots for observers 1 and 2 demonstrated a minor bias (-0.2% and -0.5%, respectively), with the 95% LOA ranges at - 4.4%-4.0% and -5.0%-4.0%, respectively.
Conclusion: The 4-min-nonECG-ECV provided ECV values comparable to those obtained by Conv-ECV.
Advances in knowledge: Myocardial ECV quantification is feasible using a non-gated, 4-minute delayed dual-energy CT scan with an already established CT acquisition method. This approach achieves ECV accuracy comparable to that of the conventional CT-ECV calculation method (gated 10-minute delayed imaging) while enhancing clinical efficacy and diagnostic throughput.
期刊介绍:
BJR is the international research journal of the British Institute of Radiology and is the oldest scientific journal in the field of radiology and related sciences.
Dating back to 1896, BJR’s history is radiology’s history, and the journal has featured some landmark papers such as the first description of Computed Tomography "Computerized transverse axial tomography" by Godfrey Hounsfield in 1973. A valuable historical resource, the complete BJR archive has been digitized from 1896.
Quick Facts:
- 2015 Impact Factor – 1.840
- Receipt to first decision – average of 6 weeks
- Acceptance to online publication – average of 3 weeks
- ISSN: 0007-1285
- eISSN: 1748-880X
Open Access option