Clinical utility of non-gated 4-minute delayed dual-energy computed tomography for myocardial extracellular volume quantification.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING British Journal of Radiology Pub Date : 2025-02-07 DOI:10.1093/bjr/tqaf022
Tsukasa Kojima, Yuzo Yamasaki, Daisuke Nishigake, Takashi Shirasaka, Masatoshi Kondo, Kazuhito Hioki, Takeshi Kamitani, Toyoyuki Kato, Kousei Ishigami
{"title":"Clinical utility of non-gated 4-minute delayed dual-energy computed tomography for myocardial extracellular volume quantification.","authors":"Tsukasa Kojima, Yuzo Yamasaki, Daisuke Nishigake, Takashi Shirasaka, Masatoshi Kondo, Kazuhito Hioki, Takeshi Kamitani, Toyoyuki Kato, Kousei Ishigami","doi":"10.1093/bjr/tqaf022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To develop and validate the myocardial extracellular volume (ECV) obtained from non-electrocardiography (ECG)-gated delayed CT images acquired 4 minutes post-contrast infusion (4-min-nonECG-ECV) compared with the ECV obtained from ECG-gated delayed CT images acquired 10 min post-contrast infusion (Conv-ECV).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively analysed 29 patients (males: 21) after a comprehensive CT protocol of both 4-min-nonECG-ECV and Conv-ECV on a dual-layer CT scanner. The mean volume of contrast medium administered: 90 ± 11.8 mL, the average heart rate during the CT examinations: 74.2 ± 18.2 bpm. Two independent observers calculated the respective 4-min-nonECG-ECV and Conv-ECV. We determined the correlation between the ECV obtained by the two methods and conducted a Bland-Altman analysis to identify systematic errors and determine the limits of agreement (LOA) between the 4-min-nonECG-ECV and Conv-ECV values.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The respective median ECV values for observer 1 were 27.3 for 4-min-nonECG-ECV and 26.5 for Conv-ECV; for observer 2, they were 27.8 and 27.1. The correlation between the methods was 0.97 for both observers (p < 0.01). The Bland-Altman plots for observers 1 and 2 demonstrated a minor bias (-0.2% and -0.5%, respectively), with the 95% LOA ranges at - 4.4%-4.0% and -5.0%-4.0%, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The 4-min-nonECG-ECV provided ECV values comparable to those obtained by Conv-ECV.</p><p><strong>Advances in knowledge: </strong>Myocardial ECV quantification is feasible using a non-gated, 4-minute delayed dual-energy CT scan with an already established CT acquisition method. This approach achieves ECV accuracy comparable to that of the conventional CT-ECV calculation method (gated 10-minute delayed imaging) while enhancing clinical efficacy and diagnostic throughput.</p>","PeriodicalId":9306,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/bjr/tqaf022","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To develop and validate the myocardial extracellular volume (ECV) obtained from non-electrocardiography (ECG)-gated delayed CT images acquired 4 minutes post-contrast infusion (4-min-nonECG-ECV) compared with the ECV obtained from ECG-gated delayed CT images acquired 10 min post-contrast infusion (Conv-ECV).

Methods: We retrospectively analysed 29 patients (males: 21) after a comprehensive CT protocol of both 4-min-nonECG-ECV and Conv-ECV on a dual-layer CT scanner. The mean volume of contrast medium administered: 90 ± 11.8 mL, the average heart rate during the CT examinations: 74.2 ± 18.2 bpm. Two independent observers calculated the respective 4-min-nonECG-ECV and Conv-ECV. We determined the correlation between the ECV obtained by the two methods and conducted a Bland-Altman analysis to identify systematic errors and determine the limits of agreement (LOA) between the 4-min-nonECG-ECV and Conv-ECV values.

Results: The respective median ECV values for observer 1 were 27.3 for 4-min-nonECG-ECV and 26.5 for Conv-ECV; for observer 2, they were 27.8 and 27.1. The correlation between the methods was 0.97 for both observers (p < 0.01). The Bland-Altman plots for observers 1 and 2 demonstrated a minor bias (-0.2% and -0.5%, respectively), with the 95% LOA ranges at - 4.4%-4.0% and -5.0%-4.0%, respectively.

Conclusion: The 4-min-nonECG-ECV provided ECV values comparable to those obtained by Conv-ECV.

Advances in knowledge: Myocardial ECV quantification is feasible using a non-gated, 4-minute delayed dual-energy CT scan with an already established CT acquisition method. This approach achieves ECV accuracy comparable to that of the conventional CT-ECV calculation method (gated 10-minute delayed imaging) while enhancing clinical efficacy and diagnostic throughput.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
研究目的开发并验证对比剂输注后 4 分钟采集的非心电图(ECG)门控延迟 CT 图像(4-min-nonECG-ECV)与对比剂输注后 10 分钟采集的心电图门控延迟 CT 图像(Conv-ECV)获得的心肌细胞外容积(ECV):我们回顾性分析了在双层 CT 扫描仪上进行 4 分钟非 ECG-ECV 和 Conv-ECV 综合 CT 方案治疗后的 29 例患者(男性:21 例)。造影剂的平均用量为 90 ± 11.8 mL,CT 检查期间的平均心率为 74.2 ± 18.2 bpm:74.2 ± 18.2 bpm。两名独立的观察者分别计算了 4 分钟非 ECG-ECV 和 Conv-ECV。我们确定了两种方法得出的 ECV 之间的相关性,并进行了 Bland-Altman 分析,以识别系统误差并确定 4 分钟非 ECG-ECV 值和 Conv-ECV 值之间的一致性极限(LOA):观察者 1 的 4 分钟非心电图心动图中位值为 27.3,Conv-心电图中位值为 26.5;观察者 2 的中位值分别为 27.8 和 27.1。两位观察者所用方法之间的相关性均为 0.97(p 结论):4分钟非ECG-ECV提供的ECV值与Conv-ECV获得的值相当:使用非门控、延迟 4 分钟的双能 CT 扫描和已确立的 CT 采集方法进行心肌 ECV 定量是可行的。这种方法可获得与传统 CT-ECV 计算方法(门控 10 分钟延迟成像)相当的 ECV 精确度,同时还能提高临床疗效和诊断效率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
British Journal of Radiology
British Journal of Radiology 医学-核医学
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
3.80%
发文量
330
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: BJR is the international research journal of the British Institute of Radiology and is the oldest scientific journal in the field of radiology and related sciences. Dating back to 1896, BJR’s history is radiology’s history, and the journal has featured some landmark papers such as the first description of Computed Tomography "Computerized transverse axial tomography" by Godfrey Hounsfield in 1973. A valuable historical resource, the complete BJR archive has been digitized from 1896. Quick Facts: - 2015 Impact Factor – 1.840 - Receipt to first decision – average of 6 weeks - Acceptance to online publication – average of 3 weeks - ISSN: 0007-1285 - eISSN: 1748-880X Open Access option
期刊最新文献
Co-occurrence of CT based radiological sarcopenia and frailty are related to impaired survival in surgical oncology. Toxicity of anti-cancer drugs: the imaging findings to watch out for in common cancers. Clinical utility of non-gated 4-minute delayed dual-energy computed tomography for myocardial extracellular volume quantification. Clinical and Research Applications of FAPI Tracers: A Review. Cost-effectiveness of trans-abdominal ultrasound for gallbladder cancer surveillance in patients with gallbladder polyps less than 10 mm in the United Kingdom.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1