Danny Luan, Neela Easwar, Zhengming Chen, Brian Link, Yucai Wang, Matthew Maurer, Brad Kahl, Laura Pinheiro, John Leonard, Peter Martin
{"title":"Improvements in Outcomes in Older Patients With Mantle Cell Lymphoma Are Associated With Improvements Across Multiple Lines of Therapy.","authors":"Danny Luan, Neela Easwar, Zhengming Chen, Brian Link, Yucai Wang, Matthew Maurer, Brad Kahl, Laura Pinheiro, John Leonard, Peter Martin","doi":"10.1016/j.clml.2025.01.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Survival in mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) has improved over time, with 1 potential reason being approval of new therapies. We hypothesized that access to multiple new agents with nonoverlapping mechanisms of action would result in significant improvements in overall survival.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Patients ages > 65 and diagnosed with MCL between 2002 and 2019 were identified using the SEER-Medicare linked database. Lines of therapy were determined using billing codes. Overall survival 1 (OS1) was defined as time of initial therapy to death, while OS2 was defined as time of second-line therapy to death. Time to next therapy (TTNT) was defined as time from first-line therapy to death or start of second-line therapy. Analyses were stratified by both year of diagnosis and year of treatment categories.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 5,441 patients were included; 4,382 patients (79.5%) had claims for first-line regimens and 1,538 (34.1%) for second-line regimens. In the first-line, use of rituximab-bendamustine (BR) increased from < 2% of patients diagnosed between 2002 and 2005 to 54% between 2014 and 2019. BTK-inhibitor (BTKi)-containing regimens, approved in 2013 for use in the second-line, accounted for 8% of first-line and 54% of second-line regimens among those diagnosed between 2014 and 2019. OS1 was significantly improved across year of diagnosis categories (P < .0001), with improvements also seen in TTNT and OS2.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We observed improvements in both OS1 and TTNT over time, which may correlate with increased BR and BTKi use as first-line agents. Unexpectedly, OS2 improvements were more modest. These data support the need for continued development of new therapies in MCL.</p>","PeriodicalId":10348,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Lymphoma, Myeloma & Leukemia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Lymphoma, Myeloma & Leukemia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clml.2025.01.008","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Survival in mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) has improved over time, with 1 potential reason being approval of new therapies. We hypothesized that access to multiple new agents with nonoverlapping mechanisms of action would result in significant improvements in overall survival.
Patients and methods: Patients ages > 65 and diagnosed with MCL between 2002 and 2019 were identified using the SEER-Medicare linked database. Lines of therapy were determined using billing codes. Overall survival 1 (OS1) was defined as time of initial therapy to death, while OS2 was defined as time of second-line therapy to death. Time to next therapy (TTNT) was defined as time from first-line therapy to death or start of second-line therapy. Analyses were stratified by both year of diagnosis and year of treatment categories.
Results: In total, 5,441 patients were included; 4,382 patients (79.5%) had claims for first-line regimens and 1,538 (34.1%) for second-line regimens. In the first-line, use of rituximab-bendamustine (BR) increased from < 2% of patients diagnosed between 2002 and 2005 to 54% between 2014 and 2019. BTK-inhibitor (BTKi)-containing regimens, approved in 2013 for use in the second-line, accounted for 8% of first-line and 54% of second-line regimens among those diagnosed between 2014 and 2019. OS1 was significantly improved across year of diagnosis categories (P < .0001), with improvements also seen in TTNT and OS2.
Conclusion: We observed improvements in both OS1 and TTNT over time, which may correlate with increased BR and BTKi use as first-line agents. Unexpectedly, OS2 improvements were more modest. These data support the need for continued development of new therapies in MCL.
期刊介绍:
Clinical Lymphoma, Myeloma & Leukemia is a peer-reviewed monthly journal that publishes original articles describing various aspects of clinical and translational research of lymphoma, myeloma and leukemia. Clinical Lymphoma, Myeloma & Leukemia is devoted to articles on detection, diagnosis, prevention, and treatment of lymphoma, myeloma, leukemia and related disorders including macroglobulinemia, amyloidosis, and plasma-cell dyscrasias. The main emphasis is on recent scientific developments in all areas related to lymphoma, myeloma and leukemia. Specific areas of interest include clinical research and mechanistic approaches; drug sensitivity and resistance; gene and antisense therapy; pathology, markers, and prognostic indicators; chemoprevention strategies; multimodality therapy; and integration of various approaches.