Improvements in Outcomes in Older Patients With Mantle Cell Lymphoma Are Associated With Improvements Across Multiple Lines of Therapy

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 HEMATOLOGY Clinical Lymphoma, Myeloma & Leukemia Pub Date : 2025-01-21 DOI:10.1016/j.clml.2025.01.008
Danny Luan , Neela Easwar , Zhengming Chen , Brian Link , Yucai Wang , Matthew Maurer , Brad Kahl , Laura Pinheiro , John Leonard , Peter Martin
{"title":"Improvements in Outcomes in Older Patients With Mantle Cell Lymphoma Are Associated With Improvements Across Multiple Lines of Therapy","authors":"Danny Luan ,&nbsp;Neela Easwar ,&nbsp;Zhengming Chen ,&nbsp;Brian Link ,&nbsp;Yucai Wang ,&nbsp;Matthew Maurer ,&nbsp;Brad Kahl ,&nbsp;Laura Pinheiro ,&nbsp;John Leonard ,&nbsp;Peter Martin","doi":"10.1016/j.clml.2025.01.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Survival in mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) has improved over time, with 1 potential reason being approval of new therapies. We hypothesized that access to multiple new agents with nonoverlapping mechanisms of action would result in significant improvements in overall survival.</div></div><div><h3>Patients and Methods</h3><div>Patients ages &gt; 65 and diagnosed with MCL between 2002 and 2019 were identified using the SEER-Medicare linked database. Lines of therapy were determined using billing codes. Overall survival 1 (OS1) was defined as time of initial therapy to death, while OS2 was defined as time of second-line therapy to death. Time to next therapy (TTNT) was defined as time from first-line therapy to death or start of second-line therapy. Analyses were stratified by both year of diagnosis and year of treatment categories.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>In total, 5,441 patients were included; 4,382 patients (79.5%) had claims for first-line regimens and 1,538 (34.1%) for second-line regimens. In the first-line, use of rituximab-bendamustine (BR) increased from &lt; 2% of patients diagnosed between 2002 and 2005 to 54% between 2014 and 2019. BTK-inhibitor (BTKi)-containing regimens, approved in 2013 for use in the second-line, accounted for 8% of first-line and 54% of second-line regimens among those diagnosed between 2014 and 2019. OS1 was significantly improved across year of diagnosis categories (<em>P</em> &lt; .0001), with improvements also seen in TTNT and OS2.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>We observed improvements in both OS1 and TTNT over time, which may correlate with increased BR and BTKi use as first-line agents. Unexpectedly, OS2 improvements were more modest. These data support the need for continued development of new therapies in MCL.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10348,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Lymphoma, Myeloma & Leukemia","volume":"25 6","pages":"Pages e383-e392.e1"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Lymphoma, Myeloma & Leukemia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2152265025000199","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Survival in mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) has improved over time, with 1 potential reason being approval of new therapies. We hypothesized that access to multiple new agents with nonoverlapping mechanisms of action would result in significant improvements in overall survival.

Patients and Methods

Patients ages > 65 and diagnosed with MCL between 2002 and 2019 were identified using the SEER-Medicare linked database. Lines of therapy were determined using billing codes. Overall survival 1 (OS1) was defined as time of initial therapy to death, while OS2 was defined as time of second-line therapy to death. Time to next therapy (TTNT) was defined as time from first-line therapy to death or start of second-line therapy. Analyses were stratified by both year of diagnosis and year of treatment categories.

Results

In total, 5,441 patients were included; 4,382 patients (79.5%) had claims for first-line regimens and 1,538 (34.1%) for second-line regimens. In the first-line, use of rituximab-bendamustine (BR) increased from < 2% of patients diagnosed between 2002 and 2005 to 54% between 2014 and 2019. BTK-inhibitor (BTKi)-containing regimens, approved in 2013 for use in the second-line, accounted for 8% of first-line and 54% of second-line regimens among those diagnosed between 2014 and 2019. OS1 was significantly improved across year of diagnosis categories (P < .0001), with improvements also seen in TTNT and OS2.

Conclusion

We observed improvements in both OS1 and TTNT over time, which may correlate with increased BR and BTKi use as first-line agents. Unexpectedly, OS2 improvements were more modest. These data support the need for continued development of new therapies in MCL.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
老年套细胞淋巴瘤患者预后的改善与多种治疗方法的改善有关。
背景:随着时间的推移,套细胞淋巴瘤(MCL)的生存率有所提高,其中一个潜在的原因是新疗法的批准。我们假设,使用多种作用机制不重叠的新药物将显著提高总生存率。患者和方法:使用SEER-Medicare关联数据库确定2002年至2019年间年龄在65岁至65岁之间诊断为MCL的患者。使用计费代码确定治疗路线。总生存期1 (OS1)定义为初始治疗至死亡时间,而OS2定义为二线治疗至死亡时间。下一次治疗时间(TTNT)定义为从一线治疗到死亡或开始二线治疗的时间。根据诊断年份和治疗年份对分析进行分层。结果:共纳入5441例患者;4382名患者(79.5%)要求一线治疗方案,1538名患者(34.1%)要求二线治疗方案。在一线,利妥昔单抗-苯达莫司汀(BR)的使用率从2002年至2005年的< 2%增加到2014年至2019年的54%。2013年批准用于二线的含btk抑制剂(BTKi)方案,在2014年至2019年诊断的患者中占一线方案的8%和二线方案的54%。OS1在各诊断类别中均有显著改善(P < 0.0001), TTNT和OS2也有改善。结论:我们观察到OS1和TTNT随着时间的推移而改善,这可能与BR和BTKi作为一线药物的使用增加有关。出乎意料的是,OS2的改进更为温和。这些数据支持继续开发MCL新疗法的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
3.70%
发文量
1606
审稿时长
26 days
期刊介绍: Clinical Lymphoma, Myeloma & Leukemia is a peer-reviewed monthly journal that publishes original articles describing various aspects of clinical and translational research of lymphoma, myeloma and leukemia. Clinical Lymphoma, Myeloma & Leukemia is devoted to articles on detection, diagnosis, prevention, and treatment of lymphoma, myeloma, leukemia and related disorders including macroglobulinemia, amyloidosis, and plasma-cell dyscrasias. The main emphasis is on recent scientific developments in all areas related to lymphoma, myeloma and leukemia. Specific areas of interest include clinical research and mechanistic approaches; drug sensitivity and resistance; gene and antisense therapy; pathology, markers, and prognostic indicators; chemoprevention strategies; multimodality therapy; and integration of various approaches.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Table of Contents Optimizing Selection of Bridging Therapies Prior to CAR-T Therapy Administration for Multiple Myeloma: Clinical Pearls From an Expert Roundtable Efficacy and Safety of Daratumumab, Pomalidomide and Dexamethasone Compared to Daratumumab, Carfilzomib and Dexamethasone in Relapsed Multiple Myeloma: Multicenter Real-World Experience Changes in Frailty Categorization Over One Year among Real-World Patients With Multiple Myeloma: A Prospective Cohort Study (MFRAIL)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1