Improvements in Outcomes in Older Patients With Mantle Cell Lymphoma Are Associated With Improvements Across Multiple Lines of Therapy.

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 HEMATOLOGY Clinical Lymphoma, Myeloma & Leukemia Pub Date : 2025-01-21 DOI:10.1016/j.clml.2025.01.008
Danny Luan, Neela Easwar, Zhengming Chen, Brian Link, Yucai Wang, Matthew Maurer, Brad Kahl, Laura Pinheiro, John Leonard, Peter Martin
{"title":"Improvements in Outcomes in Older Patients With Mantle Cell Lymphoma Are Associated With Improvements Across Multiple Lines of Therapy.","authors":"Danny Luan, Neela Easwar, Zhengming Chen, Brian Link, Yucai Wang, Matthew Maurer, Brad Kahl, Laura Pinheiro, John Leonard, Peter Martin","doi":"10.1016/j.clml.2025.01.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Survival in mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) has improved over time, with 1 potential reason being approval of new therapies. We hypothesized that access to multiple new agents with nonoverlapping mechanisms of action would result in significant improvements in overall survival.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Patients ages > 65 and diagnosed with MCL between 2002 and 2019 were identified using the SEER-Medicare linked database. Lines of therapy were determined using billing codes. Overall survival 1 (OS1) was defined as time of initial therapy to death, while OS2 was defined as time of second-line therapy to death. Time to next therapy (TTNT) was defined as time from first-line therapy to death or start of second-line therapy. Analyses were stratified by both year of diagnosis and year of treatment categories.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 5,441 patients were included; 4,382 patients (79.5%) had claims for first-line regimens and 1,538 (34.1%) for second-line regimens. In the first-line, use of rituximab-bendamustine (BR) increased from < 2% of patients diagnosed between 2002 and 2005 to 54% between 2014 and 2019. BTK-inhibitor (BTKi)-containing regimens, approved in 2013 for use in the second-line, accounted for 8% of first-line and 54% of second-line regimens among those diagnosed between 2014 and 2019. OS1 was significantly improved across year of diagnosis categories (P < .0001), with improvements also seen in TTNT and OS2.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We observed improvements in both OS1 and TTNT over time, which may correlate with increased BR and BTKi use as first-line agents. Unexpectedly, OS2 improvements were more modest. These data support the need for continued development of new therapies in MCL.</p>","PeriodicalId":10348,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Lymphoma, Myeloma & Leukemia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Lymphoma, Myeloma & Leukemia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clml.2025.01.008","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Survival in mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) has improved over time, with 1 potential reason being approval of new therapies. We hypothesized that access to multiple new agents with nonoverlapping mechanisms of action would result in significant improvements in overall survival.

Patients and methods: Patients ages > 65 and diagnosed with MCL between 2002 and 2019 were identified using the SEER-Medicare linked database. Lines of therapy were determined using billing codes. Overall survival 1 (OS1) was defined as time of initial therapy to death, while OS2 was defined as time of second-line therapy to death. Time to next therapy (TTNT) was defined as time from first-line therapy to death or start of second-line therapy. Analyses were stratified by both year of diagnosis and year of treatment categories.

Results: In total, 5,441 patients were included; 4,382 patients (79.5%) had claims for first-line regimens and 1,538 (34.1%) for second-line regimens. In the first-line, use of rituximab-bendamustine (BR) increased from < 2% of patients diagnosed between 2002 and 2005 to 54% between 2014 and 2019. BTK-inhibitor (BTKi)-containing regimens, approved in 2013 for use in the second-line, accounted for 8% of first-line and 54% of second-line regimens among those diagnosed between 2014 and 2019. OS1 was significantly improved across year of diagnosis categories (P < .0001), with improvements also seen in TTNT and OS2.

Conclusion: We observed improvements in both OS1 and TTNT over time, which may correlate with increased BR and BTKi use as first-line agents. Unexpectedly, OS2 improvements were more modest. These data support the need for continued development of new therapies in MCL.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
3.70%
发文量
1606
审稿时长
26 days
期刊介绍: Clinical Lymphoma, Myeloma & Leukemia is a peer-reviewed monthly journal that publishes original articles describing various aspects of clinical and translational research of lymphoma, myeloma and leukemia. Clinical Lymphoma, Myeloma & Leukemia is devoted to articles on detection, diagnosis, prevention, and treatment of lymphoma, myeloma, leukemia and related disorders including macroglobulinemia, amyloidosis, and plasma-cell dyscrasias. The main emphasis is on recent scientific developments in all areas related to lymphoma, myeloma and leukemia. Specific areas of interest include clinical research and mechanistic approaches; drug sensitivity and resistance; gene and antisense therapy; pathology, markers, and prognostic indicators; chemoprevention strategies; multimodality therapy; and integration of various approaches.
期刊最新文献
Corrigendum to "Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy of Generic Melphalan is Comparable to Innovator Formulation in Patients With Multiple Myeloma Undergoing Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation" [Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 20/2 (2020) 130-135.e1]. Editorial Board Table of Contents Table of Contents Editorial Board
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1