Hemithyroidectomy Versus Total Thyroidectomy for Sporadic Medullary Thyroid Cancer: A Chinese Nationwide Large-Scale Cohort Study.

IF 16.4 2区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network Pub Date : 2025-02-07 DOI:10.6004/jnccn.2024.7088
Xiao Shi, Cenkai Shen, Chuqiao Liu, Likun Zhang, Yuxin Du, Hao Zhang, Hongwei Liu, Jianbiao Wang, Chuang Chen, Yijun Wu, Chunyan Zhang, Zimeng Li, Haitao Tang, Min Yin, Xiaoqi Mao, Shuyi Liu, Yaoting Sun, Yan Zhou, Wenjun Wei, Naisi Huang, Zhihong Wang, Zhiqiang Gui, Hanqing Liu, Jiaxi Wang, Jian Li, Cuiwei Li, Shiyu Xiang, Liang Guo, Yan Zhang, Yi He, Tiannan Guo, Qinghai Ji, Zhiyan Liu, Yu Wang
{"title":"Hemithyroidectomy Versus Total Thyroidectomy for Sporadic Medullary Thyroid Cancer: A Chinese Nationwide Large-Scale Cohort Study.","authors":"Xiao Shi, Cenkai Shen, Chuqiao Liu, Likun Zhang, Yuxin Du, Hao Zhang, Hongwei Liu, Jianbiao Wang, Chuang Chen, Yijun Wu, Chunyan Zhang, Zimeng Li, Haitao Tang, Min Yin, Xiaoqi Mao, Shuyi Liu, Yaoting Sun, Yan Zhou, Wenjun Wei, Naisi Huang, Zhihong Wang, Zhiqiang Gui, Hanqing Liu, Jiaxi Wang, Jian Li, Cuiwei Li, Shiyu Xiang, Liang Guo, Yan Zhang, Yi He, Tiannan Guo, Qinghai Ji, Zhiyan Liu, Yu Wang","doi":"10.6004/jnccn.2024.7088","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Medullary thyroid cancer (MTC) is a rare thyroid malignancy, with 70% to 80% of cases being sporadic (sMTC). Current guidelines recommend total thyroidectomy (TT) for all preoperatively suspicious sMTC, though there has been increasing support for reducing the surgical extent in recent years. However, relevant data are limited. This study aimed to comprehensively evaluate the safety of hemithyroidectomy (HT) in sMTC.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>This study included 797 patients with MTC who received curative-intent initial surgery at 19 participating referral centers. Genetic testing was performed to identify disease heredity. We evaluated the safety of HT in sMTC across 5 aspects: (1) prevalence of occult bilateral foci, (2) prevalence of contralateral lobe recurrence, (3) biochemical response, (4) structural recurrence-free survival (SRFS), and (5) overall survival (OS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 797 patients, 648 were genetically confirmed as having sMTC. HT and TT were performed as the index surgery in 232 (35.8%) and 416 (64.2%) patients, respectively. In the TT group, bilateral foci were found in 34 (8.2%) patients, of whom only 10 (2.4%) had sonographically occult foci, and of these, only 3 (0.72%) had a maximal tumor size ≤2 cm. In the HT group, only 1.7% (4/232) had recurrence in the preserved lobe, with only 1 (0.43%) having a maximal tumor size ≤2 cm. After propensity score matching, 230 pairs of patients were included in further analysis. No significant differences were found in OS (log-rank: P=.484; Cox regression: P=.380), SRFS (log-rank: P=.914; Cox regression: P=.309), or biochemical response (chi-square: P=.744; logistic regression: P=.818) between the 2 groups. Subgroup analyses showed that HT conferred comparable structural and biochemical outcomes with TT in small (≤2 cm) sMTCs, even for patients with high-risk factors such as high preoperative calcitonin, multifocal disease, lymph node metastases, RETM918T mutation, and desmoplasia.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>For small unilateral sMTCs, HT may be considered an alternative treatment that does not compromise prognosis while avoiding additional complications associated with TT.</p>","PeriodicalId":17483,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network","volume":" ","pages":"105-112"},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.6004/jnccn.2024.7088","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Medullary thyroid cancer (MTC) is a rare thyroid malignancy, with 70% to 80% of cases being sporadic (sMTC). Current guidelines recommend total thyroidectomy (TT) for all preoperatively suspicious sMTC, though there has been increasing support for reducing the surgical extent in recent years. However, relevant data are limited. This study aimed to comprehensively evaluate the safety of hemithyroidectomy (HT) in sMTC.

Patients and methods: This study included 797 patients with MTC who received curative-intent initial surgery at 19 participating referral centers. Genetic testing was performed to identify disease heredity. We evaluated the safety of HT in sMTC across 5 aspects: (1) prevalence of occult bilateral foci, (2) prevalence of contralateral lobe recurrence, (3) biochemical response, (4) structural recurrence-free survival (SRFS), and (5) overall survival (OS).

Results: Of the 797 patients, 648 were genetically confirmed as having sMTC. HT and TT were performed as the index surgery in 232 (35.8%) and 416 (64.2%) patients, respectively. In the TT group, bilateral foci were found in 34 (8.2%) patients, of whom only 10 (2.4%) had sonographically occult foci, and of these, only 3 (0.72%) had a maximal tumor size ≤2 cm. In the HT group, only 1.7% (4/232) had recurrence in the preserved lobe, with only 1 (0.43%) having a maximal tumor size ≤2 cm. After propensity score matching, 230 pairs of patients were included in further analysis. No significant differences were found in OS (log-rank: P=.484; Cox regression: P=.380), SRFS (log-rank: P=.914; Cox regression: P=.309), or biochemical response (chi-square: P=.744; logistic regression: P=.818) between the 2 groups. Subgroup analyses showed that HT conferred comparable structural and biochemical outcomes with TT in small (≤2 cm) sMTCs, even for patients with high-risk factors such as high preoperative calcitonin, multifocal disease, lymph node metastases, RETM918T mutation, and desmoplasia.

Conclusions: For small unilateral sMTCs, HT may be considered an alternative treatment that does not compromise prognosis while avoiding additional complications associated with TT.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
甲状腺切除术与全甲状腺切除术治疗散发性甲状腺髓样癌:一项中国全国范围的大规模队列研究。
背景:甲状腺髓样癌(MTC)是一种罕见的甲状腺恶性肿瘤,70% ~ 80%的病例为散发性(sMTC)。尽管近年来越来越多的人支持减少手术范围,但目前的指南建议对所有术前可疑的sMTC进行全甲状腺切除术(TT)。然而,相关数据有限。本研究旨在综合评价半甲状腺切除术(HT)治疗sMTC的安全性。患者和方法:本研究包括797例MTC患者,他们在19个参与的转诊中心接受了以治愈为目的的初始手术。进行基因检测以确定疾病的遗传。我们从5个方面评估了HT治疗sMTC的安全性:(1)隐匿性双侧病灶的发生率,(2)对侧肺叶复发率,(3)生化反应,(4)结构性无复发生存期(SRFS),(5)总生存期(OS)。结果:在797例患者中,648例被遗传学证实为sMTC。HT和TT分别作为指标手术232例(35.8%)和416例(64.2%)。TT组34例(8.2%)患者发现双侧病灶,其中超声隐匿病灶10例(2.4%),其中最大肿瘤大小≤2cm的仅有3例(0.72%)。在HT组中,只有1.7%(4/232)的保留叶复发,只有1(0.43%)的最大肿瘤大小≤2 cm。倾向评分匹配后,纳入230对患者进行进一步分析。OS无显著差异(log-rank: P=.484;Cox回归:P=.380), SRFS (log-rank: P=.914;Cox回归:P=.309)或生化反应(卡方:P=.744;logistic回归:P=.818)。亚组分析显示,HT在小(≤2 cm) smtc中具有与TT相当的结构和生化结果,即使对于具有术前高降钙素、多灶性疾病、淋巴结转移、RETM918T突变和结缔组织增生等高危因素的患者也是如此。结论:对于小的单侧smtc, HT可以被认为是一种不影响预后的替代治疗,同时避免了与TT相关的其他并发症。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
20.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
388
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: JNCCN—Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network is a peer-reviewed medical journal read by over 25,000 oncologists and cancer care professionals nationwide. This indexed publication delivers the latest insights into best clinical practices, oncology health services research, and translational medicine. Notably, JNCCN provides updates on the NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology® (NCCN Guidelines®), review articles elaborating on guideline recommendations, health services research, and case reports that spotlight molecular insights in patient care. Guided by its vision, JNCCN seeks to advance the mission of NCCN by serving as the primary resource for information on NCCN Guidelines®, innovation in translational medicine, and scientific studies related to oncology health services research. This encompasses quality care and value, bioethics, comparative and cost effectiveness, public policy, and interventional research on supportive care and survivorship. JNCCN boasts indexing by prominent databases such as MEDLINE/PubMed, Chemical Abstracts, Embase, EmCare, and Scopus, reinforcing its standing as a reputable source for comprehensive information in the field of oncology.
期刊最新文献
How Healthy Are the Diets of Cancer Survivors? Characteristics of Those Most at Risk and Opportunities for Improvement. Assessing the Performance of the PREDICT Breast Version 3.0 Prognostic Tool in Patients With Breast Cancer in the United States. A Case of Cryptic CBFB::MYH11 Acute Myeloid Leukemia With Noncanonical Breakpoints Detected by Optical Genome Mapping. Authors' Reply to the Letter to the Editor by Kim et al: Are We Asking the Right Question for New Biomarkers - "Ready for Prime Time" Versus Demonstrated Clinical Utility? Letter to the Editor: Are We Asking the Right Question for New Biomarkers - "Ready for Prime Time" Versus Demonstrated Clinical Utility?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1