Hybrid Technique for Question Mark Ear Treatment.

IF 1 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Journal of Craniofacial Surgery Pub Date : 2025-02-07 DOI:10.1097/SCS.0000000000011111
Yongjun Chen, Siming Wei, Dongyue Hao, Yaotao Guo, Xianjie Ma, Liwei Dong
{"title":"Hybrid Technique for Question Mark Ear Treatment.","authors":"Yongjun Chen, Siming Wei, Dongyue Hao, Yaotao Guo, Xianjie Ma, Liwei Dong","doi":"10.1097/SCS.0000000000011111","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The question mark ear is a rare external auricular deformity characterized by the cleft between the helix and earlobe. There is also limited guidance on the management of these deformities. A noteworthy aspect of the question mark ear is the broadening of the upper auricle, yet this feature can be easily overlooked. The hybrid technique, consisting of antihelix reformation, scapha reduction, and helical rim flap advancement, was proposed to correct the deformity and restore the natural appearance of the auricle. Auricular measurements, including the length and width of the auricle, the lateral circumference of the helix rim from the superior apex to the inferior apex, and the height of the cleft, were performed preoperatively and postoperatively. Fourteen patients with question mark ear deformities were treated, 11 unilaterally and 3 bilaterally. The patient's ages ranged from 5 to 23 years old and 14.3 years on average. Follow-up ranged from 4 to 24 months and 10 months on average. Preoperative measurements indicated that the auricular width of the question mark ear was greater than that of the contralateral side, while postoperative measurements showed no significant difference in auricular width compared to the contralateral side. In addition, auricular measurements demonstrated a notable enhancement in the overall auricular configuration and cleft repair. The hybrid technique was applicable to correct question mark deformities with good results. The vertical mattress suture technique could reform the natural appearance of the antihelix. Scapha reduction and helical rim flap advancement were effective in correcting the cleft between the helix and earlobe.</p>","PeriodicalId":15462,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Craniofacial Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Craniofacial Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000011111","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The question mark ear is a rare external auricular deformity characterized by the cleft between the helix and earlobe. There is also limited guidance on the management of these deformities. A noteworthy aspect of the question mark ear is the broadening of the upper auricle, yet this feature can be easily overlooked. The hybrid technique, consisting of antihelix reformation, scapha reduction, and helical rim flap advancement, was proposed to correct the deformity and restore the natural appearance of the auricle. Auricular measurements, including the length and width of the auricle, the lateral circumference of the helix rim from the superior apex to the inferior apex, and the height of the cleft, were performed preoperatively and postoperatively. Fourteen patients with question mark ear deformities were treated, 11 unilaterally and 3 bilaterally. The patient's ages ranged from 5 to 23 years old and 14.3 years on average. Follow-up ranged from 4 to 24 months and 10 months on average. Preoperative measurements indicated that the auricular width of the question mark ear was greater than that of the contralateral side, while postoperative measurements showed no significant difference in auricular width compared to the contralateral side. In addition, auricular measurements demonstrated a notable enhancement in the overall auricular configuration and cleft repair. The hybrid technique was applicable to correct question mark deformities with good results. The vertical mattress suture technique could reform the natural appearance of the antihelix. Scapha reduction and helical rim flap advancement were effective in correcting the cleft between the helix and earlobe.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
混合技术治疗问号耳。
问号耳是一种罕见的外耳畸形,其特征是螺旋和耳垂之间的裂缝。对于这些畸形的处理也有有限的指导。问号耳的一个值得注意的方面是上耳廓的拓宽,但这个特征很容易被忽视。提出采用反螺旋重组、耳膜复位和螺旋缘瓣推进的复合技术来矫正耳廓畸形,恢复耳廓的自然外观。术前和术后测量耳廓,包括耳廓的长度和宽度,从上耳尖到下耳尖的螺旋缘外侧围度,以及裂的高度。对14例问号耳畸形进行治疗,其中单侧11例,双侧3例。患者年龄5 ~ 23岁,平均年龄14.3岁。随访时间4 ~ 24个月,平均10个月。术前测量结果显示问号耳的耳廓宽度大于对侧,术后测量结果显示问号耳的耳廓宽度与对侧无明显差异。此外,耳廓测量显示在整体耳廓结构和腭裂修复方面有显著的增强。混合技术适用于问号畸形的矫正,效果良好。垂直床垫缝合技术可以改变对螺旋的自然外观。镫骨复位和螺旋边缘瓣推进对矫正螺旋与耳垂间裂是有效的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
11.10%
发文量
968
审稿时长
1.5 months
期刊介绍: ​The Journal of Craniofacial Surgery serves as a forum of communication for all those involved in craniofacial surgery, maxillofacial surgery and pediatric plastic surgery. Coverage ranges from practical aspects of craniofacial surgery to the basic science that underlies surgical practice. The journal publishes original articles, scientific reviews, editorials and invited commentary, abstracts and selected articles from international journals, and occasional international bibliographies in craniofacial surgery.
期刊最新文献
To Stave or Not to Stave: Outcomes of Barrel Stave Osteotomies in Strip Craniectomy for Sagittal Craniosynostosis. Endoscopic "Nasal Deformity Correction + Nasal Septum Correction + Bilateral Nasal Cavity Expansion" for the Treatment of Deviated Nasal Deformity Significantly Improves Nasal Morphology and Function. "Send the Marines": Reconstructive Surgery at the Edge of Manageability. Prospective Bicentric Study on Characteristics and Management of Elderly Patients Presenting to the Emergency Department WithCranio-Maxillofacial Trauma. Long-Term Assessment of Condyle Fracture: Outcomes and Complications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1