The Impact of an Enhanced Data Visualization Tool for Hypertension in the Electronic Health Record on Physician Judgments About Hypertension Control.

IF 4.3 2区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Journal of General Internal Medicine Pub Date : 2025-02-07 DOI:10.1007/s11606-025-09381-1
Victoria A Shaffer, Pete Wegier, K D Valentine, Sean Duan, Shannon M Canfield, Jeffery L Belden, Linsey M Steege, Mihail Popescu, Richelle J Koopman
{"title":"The Impact of an Enhanced Data Visualization Tool for Hypertension in the Electronic Health Record on Physician Judgments About Hypertension Control.","authors":"Victoria A Shaffer, Pete Wegier, K D Valentine, Sean Duan, Shannon M Canfield, Jeffery L Belden, Linsey M Steege, Mihail Popescu, Richelle J Koopman","doi":"10.1007/s11606-025-09381-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Uncontrolled hypertension is a significant US health problem, despite existing effective treatments. This study assessed the impact of variations in patterns of blood pressure data on physician perceptions of hypertension control using different forms of data visualization.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Physicians (N = 57) reviewed eight brief vignettes describing a fictitious patient; each vignette included a graph of the patient's blood pressure data. We examined how variations in mean systolic blood pressure (SBP), blood pressure standard deviation (SD), and form of visualization (e.g., line graph with raw values or smoothed values only) affected judgments about hypertension control and need for medication change.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Smoothing successfully reduced visual noise for the physicians. For controlled hypertension, physician judgments were more consistent with clinical guidelines when using the smoothed graph compared with the raw data graph. Judgments about hypertension control with the smoothed graph were similar to judgments made using the raw data graph for cases of uncontrolled hypertension.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Data visualization can direct physicians to attend to more clinically meaningful information, thereby improving their judgments of hypertension control.</p>","PeriodicalId":15860,"journal":{"name":"Journal of General Internal Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of General Internal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-025-09381-1","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Uncontrolled hypertension is a significant US health problem, despite existing effective treatments. This study assessed the impact of variations in patterns of blood pressure data on physician perceptions of hypertension control using different forms of data visualization.

Method: Physicians (N = 57) reviewed eight brief vignettes describing a fictitious patient; each vignette included a graph of the patient's blood pressure data. We examined how variations in mean systolic blood pressure (SBP), blood pressure standard deviation (SD), and form of visualization (e.g., line graph with raw values or smoothed values only) affected judgments about hypertension control and need for medication change.

Results: Smoothing successfully reduced visual noise for the physicians. For controlled hypertension, physician judgments were more consistent with clinical guidelines when using the smoothed graph compared with the raw data graph. Judgments about hypertension control with the smoothed graph were similar to judgments made using the raw data graph for cases of uncontrolled hypertension.

Conclusion: Data visualization can direct physicians to attend to more clinically meaningful information, thereby improving their judgments of hypertension control.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
目的:尽管已有有效的治疗方法,但未得到控制的高血压仍是美国的一个重大健康问题。本研究采用不同形式的数据可视化方法,评估了血压数据模式的变化对医生高血压控制感知的影响:方法:医生(57 人)审阅了 8 个描述虚构病人的简短小故事;每个小故事都包括病人血压数据的图表。我们研究了平均收缩压 (SBP)、血压标准差 (SD) 和可视化形式(如带原始值的折线图或仅平滑值)的变化如何影响对高血压控制和换药需求的判断:结果:平滑化成功地减少了医生的视觉噪音。对于已控制的高血压,使用平滑图表与原始数据图表相比,医生的判断更符合临床指南。使用平滑图表对高血压控制情况的判断与使用原始数据图表对未控制高血压病例的判断相似:数据可视化可以引导医生关注更多有临床意义的信息,从而改善他们对高血压控制情况的判断。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of General Internal Medicine
Journal of General Internal Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
5.30%
发文量
749
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of General Internal Medicine is the official journal of the Society of General Internal Medicine. It promotes improved patient care, research, and education in primary care, general internal medicine, and hospital medicine. Its articles focus on topics such as clinical medicine, epidemiology, prevention, health care delivery, curriculum development, and numerous other non-traditional themes, in addition to classic clinical research on problems in internal medicine.
期刊最新文献
Lead aVR, Forget Me Not. Not All "Negatives" Are Created Equal - Understanding the Impact of Body Mass Index on B-Type Natriuretic Peptide Interpretation in Heart Failure. An Internal Medicine Resident Continuity Clinic at a Federally Qualified Health Center: Structure, Feasibility, and Early Outcomes. Interventions for Long COVID: A Narrative Review. Characterizing Physician Recommendations within Code Status Documentation: A Multicentre Cohort Study and Qualitative Discourse Analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1