An evidence-based review of the current surgical treatments for chronic low-back pain: rationale, indications, and novel therapies.

IF 2.9 2区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Journal of neurosurgery. Spine Pub Date : 2025-02-07 DOI:10.3171/2024.9.SPINE24580
Juan P Giraldo, Gabriella P Williams, Jonathan J Lee, Eric A Potts, Juan S Uribe
{"title":"An evidence-based review of the current surgical treatments for chronic low-back pain: rationale, indications, and novel therapies.","authors":"Juan P Giraldo, Gabriella P Williams, Jonathan J Lee, Eric A Potts, Juan S Uribe","doi":"10.3171/2024.9.SPINE24580","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This review analyzes the current surgical strategies and management modalities for chronic low-back pain (CLBP). In this study, the authors provide a structured review of the current state of surgical treatments for CLBP, including the rationale for surgery, indications, and novel therapies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An extensive review of the literature on the surgical management of CLBP was performed using the MEDLINE, Cochrane, Google Scholar, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases from March 1993 to May 2024. Terms used in the search were (\"low back pain/surgery\" [MeSH] AND \"chronic\" AND \"lumbar\") and (\"chronic\" AND \"low back pain\" AND \"lumbar spine\" AND \"surgery\"). The search produced 1951 articles, of which 167 were removed as duplicates, leaving 1784 for screening. Of these, 1593 articles were excluded, and 191 were retrieved to evaluate eligibility. After this evaluation, 76 articles were included in the review. No statistical analysis was performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This structured review revealed a range of surgical interventions available for CLBP. These interventions included fusion, stabilization, posterior interspinous devices, and nonoperative management, such as intensive rehabilitation and cognitive behavioral therapy. The evidence suggests that although spinal fusions are not superior in terms of Oswestry Disability Index function or pain level, they do outperform nonoperative management without intensive rehabilitation therapy. This finding is significant because it highlights the potential of surgical strategies to complement other treatments, such as pharmacological and noninterventional procedures, in managing CLBP.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The current evidence strongly advocates for a comprehensive approach to the management of CLBP. Patients with CLBP should be evaluated for surgical approaches when anatomical causes have been identified and multidisciplinary strategies have been implemented. It is reassuring to note that emerging multimodal strategies are beginning to complement neurosurgery care, and they should be integrated into the treatment plan as more substantial evidence becomes available. This emphasis on a multidisciplinary approach underscores the importance of considering all available strategies in CLBP management.</p>","PeriodicalId":16562,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurosurgery. Spine","volume":" ","pages":"1-12"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neurosurgery. Spine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3171/2024.9.SPINE24580","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This review analyzes the current surgical strategies and management modalities for chronic low-back pain (CLBP). In this study, the authors provide a structured review of the current state of surgical treatments for CLBP, including the rationale for surgery, indications, and novel therapies.

Methods: An extensive review of the literature on the surgical management of CLBP was performed using the MEDLINE, Cochrane, Google Scholar, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases from March 1993 to May 2024. Terms used in the search were ("low back pain/surgery" [MeSH] AND "chronic" AND "lumbar") and ("chronic" AND "low back pain" AND "lumbar spine" AND "surgery"). The search produced 1951 articles, of which 167 were removed as duplicates, leaving 1784 for screening. Of these, 1593 articles were excluded, and 191 were retrieved to evaluate eligibility. After this evaluation, 76 articles were included in the review. No statistical analysis was performed.

Results: This structured review revealed a range of surgical interventions available for CLBP. These interventions included fusion, stabilization, posterior interspinous devices, and nonoperative management, such as intensive rehabilitation and cognitive behavioral therapy. The evidence suggests that although spinal fusions are not superior in terms of Oswestry Disability Index function or pain level, they do outperform nonoperative management without intensive rehabilitation therapy. This finding is significant because it highlights the potential of surgical strategies to complement other treatments, such as pharmacological and noninterventional procedures, in managing CLBP.

Conclusions: The current evidence strongly advocates for a comprehensive approach to the management of CLBP. Patients with CLBP should be evaluated for surgical approaches when anatomical causes have been identified and multidisciplinary strategies have been implemented. It is reassuring to note that emerging multimodal strategies are beginning to complement neurosurgery care, and they should be integrated into the treatment plan as more substantial evidence becomes available. This emphasis on a multidisciplinary approach underscores the importance of considering all available strategies in CLBP management.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
目的:这篇综述分析了慢性腰背痛(CLBP)目前的手术策略和管理模式。在本研究中,作者对慢性腰背痛的手术治疗现状进行了系统回顾,包括手术的原理、适应症和新型疗法:方法:作者使用 MEDLINE、Cochrane、Google Scholar、Embase 和 Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials 数据库对 1993 年 3 月至 2024 年 5 月期间有关 CLBP 手术治疗的文献进行了广泛的综述。检索词包括("腰背痛/手术"[MeSH] 和 "慢性 "和 "腰椎")以及("慢性 "和 "腰背痛 "和 "腰椎 "和 "手术")。搜索结果显示有 1951 篇文章,其中 167 篇文章因重复而被删除,剩下 1784 篇文章供筛选。其中,1593 篇文章被排除,191 篇文章被检索以评估是否符合条件。经过评估后,76 篇文章被纳入综述。未进行统计分析:此次结构性综述揭示了一系列可用于治疗慢性前列腺炎的手术干预措施。这些干预措施包括融合、稳定、后路棘突间装置以及非手术治疗,如强化康复和认知行为疗法。有证据表明,虽然脊柱融合术在 Oswestry 残疾指数功能或疼痛程度方面并不占优势,但其效果确实优于不进行强化康复治疗的非手术疗法。这一发现具有重要意义,因为它凸显了手术策略在治疗慢性阻塞性肺病方面补充其他治疗方法(如药物治疗和非介入治疗)的潜力:目前的证据强烈主张采用综合方法来治疗CLBP。在确定了解剖学原因并实施了多学科策略后,应对CLBP患者进行手术治疗评估。令人欣慰的是,新兴的多模式治疗策略已开始对神经外科治疗起到补充作用,在获得更多实质性证据后,应将其纳入治疗计划。对多学科方法的强调突出了在慢性脑卒中治疗中考虑所有可用策略的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of neurosurgery. Spine
Journal of neurosurgery. Spine 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
10.70%
发文量
396
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Primarily publish original works in neurosurgery but also include studies in clinical neurophysiology, organic neurology, ophthalmology, radiology, pathology, and molecular biology.
期刊最新文献
Association between deformity angular distance ratio and neurological risk in patients undergoing three-column osteotomy. Comparison of dosimetric variability in the cervical spine between carbon fiber and titanium instrumentation. Intravenous tranexamic acid and reduction in blood loss and perioperative transfusion requirements in adult spinal deformity: a multicenter propensity-scored observational study. Posterior vertebral column resection for recurrent tethered cord syndrome: a 10-year case series. An evidence-based review of the current surgical treatments for chronic low-back pain: rationale, indications, and novel therapies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1