Psychometric Analysis of Disrespect and Abuse Scale.

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q1 NURSING Nursing Research Pub Date : 2025-02-06 DOI:10.1097/NNR.0000000000000809
Fatima Alzyoud
{"title":"Psychometric Analysis of Disrespect and Abuse Scale.","authors":"Fatima Alzyoud","doi":"10.1097/NNR.0000000000000809","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Disrespect and abuse of laboring and child-birthing women in health care is a global problem that violates the universal human rights of childbearing women. There is a lack of reliable and valid tools for measuring these behaviors. One instrument, the Disrespect and Abuse scale, has preliminary data with no established psychometrics in diverse populations. Further analysis is required to ensure the reliability and validity of this tool in diverse populations and health care settings.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We examined the psychometric properties of the Disrespect and Abuse scale in diverse international nursing and midwifery populations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional descriptive design was used to measure disrespect and abuse toward women during childbirth. Data were collected from 231 nurses and midwives across international labor and delivery units. Exploratory factor analysis was conducted using principal component analysis with oblimin rotation as the factor extraction method.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The psychometric assessment yielded a two-factor structure. Factor 1 consisted of 13 items characterizing physical and verbal abuse. Factor 2 contained nine items reflecting disrespectful behaviors. The Cronbach's alpha coefficients reflected high internal consistency.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The scale was shown to be reliable and valid in assessing self-reported disrespectful and abusive behaviors among nurses and midwives in a diverse international sample. Use could assist in the assessment of these behaviors in maternal health care facilities. Further research is warranted to confirm the scale's robustness and applicability across various populations and settings and use the Disrespect and Abuse scale to identify the burden and predictors of mistreatment of women in different health care settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":49723,"journal":{"name":"Nursing Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/NNR.0000000000000809","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Disrespect and abuse of laboring and child-birthing women in health care is a global problem that violates the universal human rights of childbearing women. There is a lack of reliable and valid tools for measuring these behaviors. One instrument, the Disrespect and Abuse scale, has preliminary data with no established psychometrics in diverse populations. Further analysis is required to ensure the reliability and validity of this tool in diverse populations and health care settings.

Objectives: We examined the psychometric properties of the Disrespect and Abuse scale in diverse international nursing and midwifery populations.

Methods: A cross-sectional descriptive design was used to measure disrespect and abuse toward women during childbirth. Data were collected from 231 nurses and midwives across international labor and delivery units. Exploratory factor analysis was conducted using principal component analysis with oblimin rotation as the factor extraction method.

Results: The psychometric assessment yielded a two-factor structure. Factor 1 consisted of 13 items characterizing physical and verbal abuse. Factor 2 contained nine items reflecting disrespectful behaviors. The Cronbach's alpha coefficients reflected high internal consistency.

Discussion: The scale was shown to be reliable and valid in assessing self-reported disrespectful and abusive behaviors among nurses and midwives in a diverse international sample. Use could assist in the assessment of these behaviors in maternal health care facilities. Further research is warranted to confirm the scale's robustness and applicability across various populations and settings and use the Disrespect and Abuse scale to identify the burden and predictors of mistreatment of women in different health care settings.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Nursing Research
Nursing Research 医学-护理
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
4.00%
发文量
102
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Nursing Research is a peer-reviewed journal celebrating over 60 years as the most sought-after nursing resource; it offers more depth, more detail, and more of what today''s nurses demand. Nursing Research covers key issues, including health promotion, human responses to illness, acute care nursing research, symptom management, cost-effectiveness, vulnerable populations, health services, and community-based nursing studies. Each issue highlights the latest research techniques, quantitative and qualitative studies, and new state-of-the-art methodological strategies, including information not yet found in textbooks. Expert commentaries and briefs are also included. In addition to 6 issues per year, Nursing Research from time to time publishes supplemental content not found anywhere else.
期刊最新文献
Two-Part Mixed-Effects Location Scale Models for Health Diary Data. Psychometric Analysis of Disrespect and Abuse Scale. Latent Profile Analysis of Fatigue Subtypes in Adults with Type 2 Diabetes. Development and Validation of the Scale of Hypoglycemia Self-Care Behavior in Type 2 Diabetes. Lessons Learned in Virtual Launch of an Antenatal Opioid Exposure Study During the COVID-19 Pandemic.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1