Breaking barriers in STEAM education: Analyzing competence acquisition through project-based learning in a European context

Paula García-Llamas , Angela Taboada , Patricia Sanz-Chumillas , Luísa Lopes Pereira , Roberto Baelo Álvarez
{"title":"Breaking barriers in STEAM education: Analyzing competence acquisition through project-based learning in a European context","authors":"Paula García-Llamas ,&nbsp;Angela Taboada ,&nbsp;Patricia Sanz-Chumillas ,&nbsp;Luísa Lopes Pereira ,&nbsp;Roberto Baelo Álvarez","doi":"10.1016/j.ijedro.2025.100449","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Project-Based Learning (PBL) is a widely applied methodology to foster professional competencies, especially when integrated with STEAM education. This study assesses the impact of a STEAM PBL activity on higher education students and academics, regarding competence acquisition (i.e., personal, professional, academic, and social competences). Additionally, it explores how participants' profiles and learning backgrounds shape their perceptions of PBL benefits by analyzing their motivations, expectations, and attitudes toward the methodology. Participants included higher education students and academics from six universities across five European countries. Data was collected through questionnaires across four domains: expectations and motivation, self-perception, competence acquisition, and satisfaction. Responses were analyzed using GLM to evaluate the influence of gender and academic role, and program modality (national or international) on participants' perceptions. Results show that both students and academics perceived similar benefits from PBL, regardless of their background or study modality. They reported high satisfaction and significant competency acquisition across all areas, with no significant differences based on gender, academic role, or prior experience, which highlights PBL as an inclusive methodology for diverse participants’ profiles. The primary motivation for participation was to gain practical skills and engage in international collaboration, with minimal influence from external rewards. The findings stress the effectiveness of the PBL approach in STEAM education for fostering key competencies in higher education, promoting personal and professional growth, collaboration, and practical application of STEAM disciplines. The inclusiveness and effectiveness of PBL for diverse profiles supports its broader implementation in STEAM education to better prepare students for global challenges.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":73445,"journal":{"name":"International journal of educational research open","volume":"8 ","pages":"Article 100449"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of educational research open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666374025000159","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Project-Based Learning (PBL) is a widely applied methodology to foster professional competencies, especially when integrated with STEAM education. This study assesses the impact of a STEAM PBL activity on higher education students and academics, regarding competence acquisition (i.e., personal, professional, academic, and social competences). Additionally, it explores how participants' profiles and learning backgrounds shape their perceptions of PBL benefits by analyzing their motivations, expectations, and attitudes toward the methodology. Participants included higher education students and academics from six universities across five European countries. Data was collected through questionnaires across four domains: expectations and motivation, self-perception, competence acquisition, and satisfaction. Responses were analyzed using GLM to evaluate the influence of gender and academic role, and program modality (national or international) on participants' perceptions. Results show that both students and academics perceived similar benefits from PBL, regardless of their background or study modality. They reported high satisfaction and significant competency acquisition across all areas, with no significant differences based on gender, academic role, or prior experience, which highlights PBL as an inclusive methodology for diverse participants’ profiles. The primary motivation for participation was to gain practical skills and engage in international collaboration, with minimal influence from external rewards. The findings stress the effectiveness of the PBL approach in STEAM education for fostering key competencies in higher education, promoting personal and professional growth, collaboration, and practical application of STEAM disciplines. The inclusiveness and effectiveness of PBL for diverse profiles supports its broader implementation in STEAM education to better prepare students for global challenges.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
69 days
期刊最新文献
Teachers’ perceptions about online teaching: Analysis of their experiences and opportunities for knowledge sharing Exploring students’ lived experience in online learning during Covid-19 pandemic through a phenomenological hermeneutic perspective Enhancing skills for scientific writing: A mixed-methods study at the faculty of health sciences, damascus university Evaluation of policies for disability and social inclusion in Colombian higher education Shaping generative AI governance in higher education: Insights from student perception
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1