Evaluation of resilience in pediatric well-controlled epilepsy patients

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery Pub Date : 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1016/j.clineuro.2025.108779
Mutluay Arslan , Ayşe Nur Coşkun , Canan Üstün , Özgen Hür , Bülent Ünay
{"title":"Evaluation of resilience in pediatric well-controlled epilepsy patients","authors":"Mutluay Arslan ,&nbsp;Ayşe Nur Coşkun ,&nbsp;Canan Üstün ,&nbsp;Özgen Hür ,&nbsp;Bülent Ünay","doi":"10.1016/j.clineuro.2025.108779","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>The main objective of this study was to assess the resilience scores of children with well-controlled epilepsy and their healthy counterparts using the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC). The secondary objective was to investigate the potential association between the age at onset, seizure type, and anti-seizure medication, and resilience in pediatric patients with well-controlled epilepsy.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This cross-sectional case-control study was performed on children aged 10–18 in a Training and Research Hospital Pediatric Neurology and Pediatric Outpatient Clinic. The study encompassed a total of 103 participants, comprising 57 children diagnosed with epilepsy and 46 healthy counterparts. Resilience and its individual components, namely hardiness, flexibility, coping, purpose, optimism, regulation of emotion and cognition, and self-efficacy, were assessed utilizing the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>There was no statistically significant difference observed in the total CD-RISC scores between children with epilepsy (61.0 ± 17.7) and the healthy cohort (60.8 ± 14.4) (p: 0.97). Furthermore, a comprehensive analysis revealed no significant correlations between the CD-RISC total score and its individual component scores, taking into consideration various factors such as age, gender, age at onset, last seizure date, seizure type, EEG findings, and brain MRI findings.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Regardless of age, gender, age at onset, seizure type and anti-seizure medication, in well-controlled epilepsy, resilience is similar to that of healthy children. New studies are needed to evaluate resilience in children with epilepsy who have uncontrolled seizures and receive polytherapy.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10385,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery","volume":"249 ","pages":"Article 108779"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0303846725000629","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

The main objective of this study was to assess the resilience scores of children with well-controlled epilepsy and their healthy counterparts using the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC). The secondary objective was to investigate the potential association between the age at onset, seizure type, and anti-seizure medication, and resilience in pediatric patients with well-controlled epilepsy.

Methods

This cross-sectional case-control study was performed on children aged 10–18 in a Training and Research Hospital Pediatric Neurology and Pediatric Outpatient Clinic. The study encompassed a total of 103 participants, comprising 57 children diagnosed with epilepsy and 46 healthy counterparts. Resilience and its individual components, namely hardiness, flexibility, coping, purpose, optimism, regulation of emotion and cognition, and self-efficacy, were assessed utilizing the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC).

Results

There was no statistically significant difference observed in the total CD-RISC scores between children with epilepsy (61.0 ± 17.7) and the healthy cohort (60.8 ± 14.4) (p: 0.97). Furthermore, a comprehensive analysis revealed no significant correlations between the CD-RISC total score and its individual component scores, taking into consideration various factors such as age, gender, age at onset, last seizure date, seizure type, EEG findings, and brain MRI findings.

Conclusion

Regardless of age, gender, age at onset, seizure type and anti-seizure medication, in well-controlled epilepsy, resilience is similar to that of healthy children. New studies are needed to evaluate resilience in children with epilepsy who have uncontrolled seizures and receive polytherapy.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery
Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
5.30%
发文量
358
审稿时长
46 days
期刊介绍: Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery is devoted to publishing papers and reports on the clinical aspects of neurology and neurosurgery. It is an international forum for papers of high scientific standard that are of interest to Neurologists and Neurosurgeons world-wide.
期刊最新文献
Neurological manifestations and complications of Kikuchi-Fujimoto disease: A comprehensive systematic review Augmented reality in cranial surgery: Surgical planning and maximal safety in resection of brain tumors via head-mounted fiber tractography Spinal synovial cyst: A retrospective analysis of 204 cases Bacterial DNA in patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms: Investigating the potential role of periodontal and gut microbiota Nomogram for predicting cemented vertebral refracture after percutaneous kyphoplasty in postmenopausal women with osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1