{"title":"(In)Frequently traded corporate bonds and pricing implications of liquidity dry-ups","authors":"Alexey Ivashchenko","doi":"10.1016/j.frl.2025.106880","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>I study the link between corporate bond trading activity and expected bond return. I show that many individual corporate bonds experience booms and busts of trading activity. Such (in)frequently traded bonds have higher expected returns following periods of active trading, alongside greater return volatility. Of two actively traded bonds, one with a history of trading activity dry-ups carries the expected return premium of 10-20 bps per month, controlling for bond credit risk and illiquidity characteristics. Therefore, it is not just the current state of illiquidity that impacts expected return but also the bond’s recent history of illiquidity fluctuations. I connect liquidity dry-ups with changes in bond institutional ownership, implying that the expected return and risk also depend on who owns the bonds.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12167,"journal":{"name":"Finance Research Letters","volume":"75 ","pages":"Article 106880"},"PeriodicalIF":7.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Finance Research Letters","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S154461232500145X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
I study the link between corporate bond trading activity and expected bond return. I show that many individual corporate bonds experience booms and busts of trading activity. Such (in)frequently traded bonds have higher expected returns following periods of active trading, alongside greater return volatility. Of two actively traded bonds, one with a history of trading activity dry-ups carries the expected return premium of 10-20 bps per month, controlling for bond credit risk and illiquidity characteristics. Therefore, it is not just the current state of illiquidity that impacts expected return but also the bond’s recent history of illiquidity fluctuations. I connect liquidity dry-ups with changes in bond institutional ownership, implying that the expected return and risk also depend on who owns the bonds.
期刊介绍:
Finance Research Letters welcomes submissions across all areas of finance, aiming for rapid publication of significant new findings. The journal particularly encourages papers that provide insight into the replicability of established results, examine the cross-national applicability of previous findings, challenge existing methodologies, or demonstrate methodological contingencies.
Papers are invited in the following areas:
Actuarial studies
Alternative investments
Asset Pricing
Bankruptcy and liquidation
Banks and other Depository Institutions
Behavioral and experimental finance
Bibliometric and Scientometric studies of finance
Capital budgeting and corporate investment
Capital markets and accounting
Capital structure and payout policy
Commodities
Contagion, crises and interdependence
Corporate governance
Credit and fixed income markets and instruments
Derivatives
Emerging markets
Energy Finance and Energy Markets
Financial Econometrics
Financial History
Financial intermediation and money markets
Financial markets and marketplaces
Financial Mathematics and Econophysics
Financial Regulation and Law
Forecasting
Frontier market studies
International Finance
Market efficiency, event studies
Mergers, acquisitions and the market for corporate control
Micro Finance Institutions
Microstructure
Non-bank Financial Institutions
Personal Finance
Portfolio choice and investing
Real estate finance and investing
Risk
SME, Family and Entrepreneurial Finance