Development and validation of the albumin-bilirubin gamma-glutamyl transferase score for enhanced prognostic accuracy after hepatocellular carcinoma resection

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery Pub Date : 2025-02-06 DOI:10.1016/j.gassur.2025.101984
Miho Akabane , Jun Kawashima , Abdullah Altaf , Selamawit Woldesenbet , François Cauchy , Federico Aucejo , Irinel Popescu , Minoru Kitago , Guillaume Martel , Francesca Ratti , Luca Aldrighetti , George A. Poultsides , Yuki Imaoka , Andrea Ruzzenente , Itaru Endo , Ana Gleisner , Hugo P. Marques , Vincent Lam , Tom Hugh , Nazim Bhimani , Timothy M. Pawlik
{"title":"Development and validation of the albumin-bilirubin gamma-glutamyl transferase score for enhanced prognostic accuracy after hepatocellular carcinoma resection","authors":"Miho Akabane ,&nbsp;Jun Kawashima ,&nbsp;Abdullah Altaf ,&nbsp;Selamawit Woldesenbet ,&nbsp;François Cauchy ,&nbsp;Federico Aucejo ,&nbsp;Irinel Popescu ,&nbsp;Minoru Kitago ,&nbsp;Guillaume Martel ,&nbsp;Francesca Ratti ,&nbsp;Luca Aldrighetti ,&nbsp;George A. Poultsides ,&nbsp;Yuki Imaoka ,&nbsp;Andrea Ruzzenente ,&nbsp;Itaru Endo ,&nbsp;Ana Gleisner ,&nbsp;Hugo P. Marques ,&nbsp;Vincent Lam ,&nbsp;Tom Hugh ,&nbsp;Nazim Bhimani ,&nbsp;Timothy M. Pawlik","doi":"10.1016/j.gassur.2025.101984","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The albumin-bilirubin (ALBI) score, used for predicting outcomes after hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) resection, does not directly capture liver cell damage or biliary obstruction. Gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT), which reflects hepatic oxidative stress and inflammation, may complement the ALBI score. We sought to develop the ALBI-GGT score, a composite prognostic tool, and evaluate its performance to predict long-term outcomes among patients undergoing HCC resection.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Patients undergoing curative-intent HCC resection (2000–2023) were identified from an international, multi-institutional database. The cohort was divided into training (65%) and testing cohorts (35%). Multivariable Cox analysis examined the association of ALBI-GGT score with overall survival (OS).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Among 759 patients, the median ALBI score was −2.78 (−3.02 to −2.48), and the median GGT was 55.0 U/L (31.0–93.0). On multivariable analysis, ALBI score (hazard ratio [HR], 1.473 [1.112–1.950]; <em>P</em> =.007) and GGT (HR, 1.007 [1.004–1.010]; <em>P</em> &lt;.001) were predictors of overall mortality, alongside tumor burden score (HR, 1.051 [1.015–1.090]; <em>P</em> =.006) and American Society of Anesthesiologists class &gt;2 (HR, 1.473 [1.005–2.161]; <em>P</em> =.047). There was a near-linear correlation between increasing ALBI scores and GGT and higher hazards of death. The ALBI-GGT score demonstrated the highest predictive accuracy in the testing set (concordance index, 0.68 [0.58–0.72]), outperforming the ALBI score (0.62 [0.56–0.69]) and GGT (0.65 [0.58–0.72]). The ALBI-GGT achieved the lowest Akaike and Bayesian information criteria. Time-dependent area under the curve (AUC) analysis demonstrated consistent superiority over 0 to 60 months. At 1-, 3-, and 5-years, the ALBI-GGT score had AUCs of 0.782, 0.725, and 0.688, respectively, outperforming ALBI score and GGT. The ALBI-GGT score was able to stratify patients into distinct prognostic groups (5-year OS, low ALBI-GGT [85.0%] vs intermediate ALBI-GGT [65.8%] vs high ALBI-GGT [56.8%]; <em>P</em> &lt;.001).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>ALBI score alone may be insufficient to prognostically stratify patients with HCC. Combining ALBI score with GGT was a superior tool to stratify patients relative to long-term survival.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15893,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery","volume":"29 4","pages":"Article 101984"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1091255X25000435","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

The albumin-bilirubin (ALBI) score, used for predicting outcomes after hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) resection, does not directly capture liver cell damage or biliary obstruction. Gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT), which reflects hepatic oxidative stress and inflammation, may complement the ALBI score. We sought to develop the ALBI-GGT score, a composite prognostic tool, and evaluate its performance to predict long-term outcomes among patients undergoing HCC resection.

Methods

Patients undergoing curative-intent HCC resection (2000–2023) were identified from an international, multi-institutional database. The cohort was divided into training (65%) and testing cohorts (35%). Multivariable Cox analysis examined the association of ALBI-GGT score with overall survival (OS).

Results

Among 759 patients, the median ALBI score was −2.78 (−3.02 to −2.48), and the median GGT was 55.0 U/L (31.0–93.0). On multivariable analysis, ALBI score (hazard ratio [HR], 1.473 [1.112–1.950]; P =.007) and GGT (HR, 1.007 [1.004–1.010]; P <.001) were predictors of overall mortality, alongside tumor burden score (HR, 1.051 [1.015–1.090]; P =.006) and American Society of Anesthesiologists class >2 (HR, 1.473 [1.005–2.161]; P =.047). There was a near-linear correlation between increasing ALBI scores and GGT and higher hazards of death. The ALBI-GGT score demonstrated the highest predictive accuracy in the testing set (concordance index, 0.68 [0.58–0.72]), outperforming the ALBI score (0.62 [0.56–0.69]) and GGT (0.65 [0.58–0.72]). The ALBI-GGT achieved the lowest Akaike and Bayesian information criteria. Time-dependent area under the curve (AUC) analysis demonstrated consistent superiority over 0 to 60 months. At 1-, 3-, and 5-years, the ALBI-GGT score had AUCs of 0.782, 0.725, and 0.688, respectively, outperforming ALBI score and GGT. The ALBI-GGT score was able to stratify patients into distinct prognostic groups (5-year OS, low ALBI-GGT [85.0%] vs intermediate ALBI-GGT [65.8%] vs high ALBI-GGT [56.8%]; P <.001).

Conclusion

ALBI score alone may be insufficient to prognostically stratify patients with HCC. Combining ALBI score with GGT was a superior tool to stratify patients relative to long-term survival.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
3.10%
发文量
319
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery is a scholarly, peer-reviewed journal that updates the surgeon on the latest developments in gastrointestinal surgery. The journal includes original articles on surgery of the digestive tract; gastrointestinal images; "How I Do It" articles, subject reviews, book reports, editorial columns, the SSAT Presidential Address, articles by a guest orator, symposia, letters, results of conferences and more. This is the official publication of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract. The journal functions as an outstanding forum for continuing education in surgery and diseases of the gastrointestinal tract.
期刊最新文献
Colonic metastasis of primary lung adenocarcinoma. The First International Experience with Histotripsy: A Safety Analysis of 230 Cases. Recurrence Patterns and Prediction of Survival After Recurrence for Gallbladder Cancer. Perforated peptic ulcer: close or patch a century-old controversy. Calcified Pancreatic Cyst in a Woman Without History of Pancreatitis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1