Development and validation of the albumin-bilirubin gamma-glutamyl transferase score for enhanced prognostic accuracy after hepatocellular carcinoma resection

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery Pub Date : 2025-02-06 DOI:10.1016/j.gassur.2025.101984
Miho Akabane , Jun Kawashima , Abdullah Altaf , Selamawit Woldesenbet , François Cauchy , Federico Aucejo , Irinel Popescu , Minoru Kitago , Guillaume Martel , Francesca Ratti , Luca Aldrighetti , George A. Poultsides , Yuki Imaoka , Andrea Ruzzenente , Itaru Endo , Ana Gleisner , Hugo P. Marques , Vincent Lam , Tom Hugh , Nazim Bhimani , Timothy M. Pawlik
{"title":"Development and validation of the albumin-bilirubin gamma-glutamyl transferase score for enhanced prognostic accuracy after hepatocellular carcinoma resection","authors":"Miho Akabane ,&nbsp;Jun Kawashima ,&nbsp;Abdullah Altaf ,&nbsp;Selamawit Woldesenbet ,&nbsp;François Cauchy ,&nbsp;Federico Aucejo ,&nbsp;Irinel Popescu ,&nbsp;Minoru Kitago ,&nbsp;Guillaume Martel ,&nbsp;Francesca Ratti ,&nbsp;Luca Aldrighetti ,&nbsp;George A. Poultsides ,&nbsp;Yuki Imaoka ,&nbsp;Andrea Ruzzenente ,&nbsp;Itaru Endo ,&nbsp;Ana Gleisner ,&nbsp;Hugo P. Marques ,&nbsp;Vincent Lam ,&nbsp;Tom Hugh ,&nbsp;Nazim Bhimani ,&nbsp;Timothy M. Pawlik","doi":"10.1016/j.gassur.2025.101984","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The albumin-bilirubin (ALBI) score, used for predicting outcomes after hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) resection, does not directly capture liver cell damage or biliary obstruction. Gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT), which reflects hepatic oxidative stress and inflammation, may complement the ALBI score. We sought to develop the ALBI-GGT score, a composite prognostic tool, and evaluate its performance to predict long-term outcomes among patients undergoing HCC resection.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Patients undergoing curative-intent HCC resection (2000–2023) were identified from an international, multi-institutional database. The cohort was divided into training (65%) and testing cohorts (35%). Multivariable Cox analysis examined the association of ALBI-GGT score with overall survival (OS).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Among 759 patients, the median ALBI score was −2.78 (−3.02 to −2.48), and the median GGT was 55.0 U/L (31.0–93.0). On multivariable analysis, ALBI score (hazard ratio [HR], 1.473 [1.112–1.950]; <em>P</em> =.007) and GGT (HR, 1.007 [1.004–1.010]; <em>P</em> &lt;.001) were predictors of overall mortality, alongside tumor burden score (HR, 1.051 [1.015–1.090]; <em>P</em> =.006) and American Society of Anesthesiologists class &gt;2 (HR, 1.473 [1.005–2.161]; <em>P</em> =.047). There was a near-linear correlation between increasing ALBI scores and GGT and higher hazards of death. The ALBI-GGT score demonstrated the highest predictive accuracy in the testing set (concordance index, 0.68 [0.58–0.72]), outperforming the ALBI score (0.62 [0.56–0.69]) and GGT (0.65 [0.58–0.72]). The ALBI-GGT achieved the lowest Akaike and Bayesian information criteria. Time-dependent area under the curve (AUC) analysis demonstrated consistent superiority over 0 to 60 months. At 1-, 3-, and 5-years, the ALBI-GGT score had AUCs of 0.782, 0.725, and 0.688, respectively, outperforming ALBI score and GGT. The ALBI-GGT score was able to stratify patients into distinct prognostic groups (5-year OS, low ALBI-GGT [85.0%] vs intermediate ALBI-GGT [65.8%] vs high ALBI-GGT [56.8%]; <em>P</em> &lt;.001).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>ALBI score alone may be insufficient to prognostically stratify patients with HCC. Combining ALBI score with GGT was a superior tool to stratify patients relative to long-term survival.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15893,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery","volume":"29 4","pages":"Article 101984"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1091255X25000435","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

The albumin-bilirubin (ALBI) score, used for predicting outcomes after hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) resection, does not directly capture liver cell damage or biliary obstruction. Gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT), which reflects hepatic oxidative stress and inflammation, may complement the ALBI score. We sought to develop the ALBI-GGT score, a composite prognostic tool, and evaluate its performance to predict long-term outcomes among patients undergoing HCC resection.

Methods

Patients undergoing curative-intent HCC resection (2000–2023) were identified from an international, multi-institutional database. The cohort was divided into training (65%) and testing cohorts (35%). Multivariable Cox analysis examined the association of ALBI-GGT score with overall survival (OS).

Results

Among 759 patients, the median ALBI score was −2.78 (−3.02 to −2.48), and the median GGT was 55.0 U/L (31.0–93.0). On multivariable analysis, ALBI score (hazard ratio [HR], 1.473 [1.112–1.950]; P =.007) and GGT (HR, 1.007 [1.004–1.010]; P <.001) were predictors of overall mortality, alongside tumor burden score (HR, 1.051 [1.015–1.090]; P =.006) and American Society of Anesthesiologists class >2 (HR, 1.473 [1.005–2.161]; P =.047). There was a near-linear correlation between increasing ALBI scores and GGT and higher hazards of death. The ALBI-GGT score demonstrated the highest predictive accuracy in the testing set (concordance index, 0.68 [0.58–0.72]), outperforming the ALBI score (0.62 [0.56–0.69]) and GGT (0.65 [0.58–0.72]). The ALBI-GGT achieved the lowest Akaike and Bayesian information criteria. Time-dependent area under the curve (AUC) analysis demonstrated consistent superiority over 0 to 60 months. At 1-, 3-, and 5-years, the ALBI-GGT score had AUCs of 0.782, 0.725, and 0.688, respectively, outperforming ALBI score and GGT. The ALBI-GGT score was able to stratify patients into distinct prognostic groups (5-year OS, low ALBI-GGT [85.0%] vs intermediate ALBI-GGT [65.8%] vs high ALBI-GGT [56.8%]; P <.001).

Conclusion

ALBI score alone may be insufficient to prognostically stratify patients with HCC. Combining ALBI score with GGT was a superior tool to stratify patients relative to long-term survival.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
albi - γ -谷氨酰转移酶评分提高肝细胞癌切除术后预后准确性的发展和验证。
背景:白蛋白-胆红素(ALBI)评分,用于预测肝细胞癌(HCC)切除术后的预后,不能直接捕获肝细胞损伤或胆道阻塞。γ -谷氨酰转移酶(GGT),反映肝脏氧化应激和炎症,可以补充ALBI评分。我们试图开发ALBI-GGT评分,这是一种综合预后工具,并评估其在预测HCC切除术患者长期预后方面的表现。方法:从一个国际多机构数据库中确定接受治疗意图HCC切除术的患者(2000-2023年)。该队列分为培训(65%)和测试(35%)队列。多变量Cox分析检验了ALBI-GGT评分与总生存期(OS)的关系。结果:759例患者中,ALBI评分中位数为-2.78[-3.02,-2.48],GGT中位数为55.0[31.0,93.0]U/L。在多变量分析中,ALBI评分(HR:1.473[1.112-1.950];p=0.007)和GGT(HR:1.007[1.004-1.010];p2(HR:1.473[1.005-2.161];p=0.047)。ALBI评分升高、GGT升高与死亡风险升高之间存在近线性相关。ALBI-GGT评分在测试集中表现出最高的预测准确性(C-index:0.68[0.58-0.72]),优于ALBI评分(0.62[0.56-0.69])和GGT评分(0.65[0.58-0.72])。它达到了最低的赤池和贝叶斯信息准则。随时间变化的AUC分析显示0-60个月内具有一致的优势。在1、3和5年时,ALBI-GGT评分的auc分别为0.782、0.725和0.688,优于ALBI评分和GGT。ALBI- ggt评分能够将患者分为不同的预后组(5年OS:低ALBI- ggt,85.0% vs.中等ALBI- ggt,65.8% vs.高ALBI- ggt,56.8%)。结论:单独的ALBI评分可能不足以对HCC患者进行预后分层。将ALBI评分与GGT相结合为患者的长期生存提供了更好的分层工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
3.10%
发文量
319
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery is a scholarly, peer-reviewed journal that updates the surgeon on the latest developments in gastrointestinal surgery. The journal includes original articles on surgery of the digestive tract; gastrointestinal images; "How I Do It" articles, subject reviews, book reports, editorial columns, the SSAT Presidential Address, articles by a guest orator, symposia, letters, results of conferences and more. This is the official publication of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract. The journal functions as an outstanding forum for continuing education in surgery and diseases of the gastrointestinal tract.
期刊最新文献
Geographic Variation in Multimodal Treatment for Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma across U.S. Health Service Areas. Letter to Editor regarding: Real-world outcomes in patients with cirrhosis undergoing cholecystectomy: a population-based study. Hepatic solitary fibrous tumor. Radiomics for Detection of Pancreatic Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Robotic-Assisted Resection of a Retroperitoneal Arteriovenous Malformation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1