Modeling optimal combination of breast and cervical cancer screening strategies in China.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY BMC Women's Health Pub Date : 2025-02-08 DOI:10.1186/s12905-025-03573-x
Xuewei Liu, Yanbo Wang, Bei Gao, Xinlin Lu, Yuan Wang, Wenli Lu
{"title":"Modeling optimal combination of breast and cervical cancer screening strategies in China.","authors":"Xuewei Liu, Yanbo Wang, Bei Gao, Xinlin Lu, Yuan Wang, Wenli Lu","doi":"10.1186/s12905-025-03573-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Breast and cervical cancers are the commonest cancers among women. Secondary prevention of cancer through screening minimizes disease burden and improves survival outcomes. Optimizing screening strategies for breast and cervical cancers is a challenge in resource-limited settings with a high population density such as China. Therefore, we aimed at assessing the efficiency of different combined screening strategies for breast and cervical cancers under different budgets in China.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Markov cohort model was used to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of 36 strategy combinations for breast and cervical cancer screening with varying screening modality and intervals. The results were used as inputs in the Integer Programming (IP) model to determine the combination of the different screening options under different budgets.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The optimal combination strategy was biennial breast ultrasonography (BUS) and mammography (MAM) in parallel screening and quinquennial human papillomavirus (HPV) for breast and cervical cancer screening under the threshold of the annual per capita social cost investment (PCSCI) (18.80 USD) in China. Using this strategy, the total investment cost for 100,000 females was 1,877,984.50 USD, and the incremental life-years compared with no screening was 3,122 life-years. The optimal combination strategy included annual clinical breast examination (CBE), BUS and MAM in series screening, and biennial thin-layer liquid-based cytology (TCT) and HPV in series screening with the annual PCSCI reaching 37.60 USD. Thereafter, as the cost input continued to increase, the optimal combination strategy remained unchanged, and the sum of incremental life-years and actual input costs did not increase.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>From a social cost-benefit perspective, biennial BUS and MAM in parallel screening, and quinquennial HPV screening is the most efficient combination strategy with limited budget, while annual CBE, BUS and MAM in series screening and biennial TCT and HPV in series screening are the most efficient combination strategy with sufficient budget.</p>","PeriodicalId":9204,"journal":{"name":"BMC Women's Health","volume":"25 1","pages":"56"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11807319/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Women's Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12905-025-03573-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Breast and cervical cancers are the commonest cancers among women. Secondary prevention of cancer through screening minimizes disease burden and improves survival outcomes. Optimizing screening strategies for breast and cervical cancers is a challenge in resource-limited settings with a high population density such as China. Therefore, we aimed at assessing the efficiency of different combined screening strategies for breast and cervical cancers under different budgets in China.

Methods: Markov cohort model was used to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of 36 strategy combinations for breast and cervical cancer screening with varying screening modality and intervals. The results were used as inputs in the Integer Programming (IP) model to determine the combination of the different screening options under different budgets.

Results: The optimal combination strategy was biennial breast ultrasonography (BUS) and mammography (MAM) in parallel screening and quinquennial human papillomavirus (HPV) for breast and cervical cancer screening under the threshold of the annual per capita social cost investment (PCSCI) (18.80 USD) in China. Using this strategy, the total investment cost for 100,000 females was 1,877,984.50 USD, and the incremental life-years compared with no screening was 3,122 life-years. The optimal combination strategy included annual clinical breast examination (CBE), BUS and MAM in series screening, and biennial thin-layer liquid-based cytology (TCT) and HPV in series screening with the annual PCSCI reaching 37.60 USD. Thereafter, as the cost input continued to increase, the optimal combination strategy remained unchanged, and the sum of incremental life-years and actual input costs did not increase.

Conclusions: From a social cost-benefit perspective, biennial BUS and MAM in parallel screening, and quinquennial HPV screening is the most efficient combination strategy with limited budget, while annual CBE, BUS and MAM in series screening and biennial TCT and HPV in series screening are the most efficient combination strategy with sufficient budget.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
中国乳腺癌和宫颈癌筛查策略的最佳组合建模。
背景:乳腺癌和宫颈癌是女性中最常见的癌症。通过筛查进行癌症二级预防可将疾病负担降至最低,并改善生存结果。优化乳腺癌和宫颈癌筛查策略在资源有限、人口密度高的中国是一项挑战。因此,我们旨在评估中国不同预算下不同乳腺癌和宫颈癌联合筛查策略的效率。方法:采用马尔可夫队列模型对不同筛查方式和间隔的36种乳腺癌和宫颈癌筛查策略组合进行成本-效果评估。结果被用作整数规划(IP)模型的输入,以确定不同预算下不同筛选方案的组合。结果:在中国人均年社会成本投资(PCSCI)(18.80美元)阈值下,两年一次的乳腺超声检查(BUS)和乳房x光检查(MAM)并行筛查和五年一次的人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)筛查是最优组合策略。采用该策略,10万名女性的总投资成本为1,877,984.50美元,与未筛查相比,增加的生命年为3,122生命年。最佳组合策略为每年一次的临床乳腺检查(CBE)、BUS和MAM系列筛查,以及两年一次的薄层液基细胞学(TCT)和HPV系列筛查,年度PCSCI达到37.60美元。此后,随着成本投入的持续增加,最优组合策略不变,增量寿命年与实际投入成本之和不增加。结论:从社会成本效益的角度来看,在预算有限的情况下,两年一次的BUS和MAM并行筛查和五年一次的HPV筛查是最有效的组合策略,而每年一次的CBE、BUS和MAM系列筛查和两年一次的TCT和HPV系列筛查是最有效的组合策略,预算充足。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Women's Health
BMC Women's Health OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
4.00%
发文量
444
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Women''s Health is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the health and wellbeing of adolescent girls and women, with a particular focus on the physical, mental, and emotional health of women in developed and developing nations. The journal welcomes submissions on women''s public health issues, health behaviours, breast cancer, gynecological diseases, mental health and health promotion.
期刊最新文献
Factors associated with cervical cancer screening uptake among women aged 30-49 years of Bhanu Municipality, Tanahun, Nepal: a cross-sectional study. A latent profile analysis of health characteristics in relation to sleep among female sex workers in entertainment venues in Wuhan, China. Self-management experiences of vaginal toxicities among patients undergoing radical radiotherapy for cervical cancer: a qualitative study. Epidemiological study and clinical consequences of endometriosis and PCOS co-occurrence in a clinical population of women: a cross-sectional study. Prevalence of female sexual dysfunction and associated factors among women in Ethiopia: a systematic review and meta- analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1