Advancing Alzheimer's disease risk prediction: development and validation of a machine learning-based preclinical screening model in a cross-sectional study.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL BMJ Open Pub Date : 2025-02-08 DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2024-092293
Bingsheng Wang, Ruihan Xie, Wenhao Qi, Jiani Yao, Yankai Shi, Xiajing Lou, Chaoqun Dong, Xiaohong Zhu, Bing Wang, Danni He, Yanfei Chen, Shihua Cao
{"title":"Advancing Alzheimer's disease risk prediction: development and validation of a machine learning-based preclinical screening model in a cross-sectional study.","authors":"Bingsheng Wang, Ruihan Xie, Wenhao Qi, Jiani Yao, Yankai Shi, Xiajing Lou, Chaoqun Dong, Xiaohong Zhu, Bing Wang, Danni He, Yanfei Chen, Shihua Cao","doi":"10.1136/bmjopen-2024-092293","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Alzheimer's disease (AD) poses a significant challenge for individuals aged 65 and older, being the most prevalent form of dementia. Although existing AD risk prediction tools demonstrate high accuracy, their complexity and limited accessibility restrict practical application. This study aimed to develop a convenience, efficient prediction model for AD risk using machine learning techniques.</p><p><strong>Design and setting: </strong>We conducted a cross-sectional study with participants aged 60 and older from the National Alzheimer's Coordinating Center. We selected personal characteristics, clinical data and psychosocial factors as baseline predictors for AD (March 2015 to December 2021). The study utilised Random Forest and Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) algorithms alongside traditional logistic regression for modelling. An oversampling method was applied to balance the data set.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>This study has no interventions.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>The study included 2379 participants, of whom 507 were diagnosed with AD.</p><p><strong>Primary and secondary outcome measures: </strong>Including accuracy, precision, recall, F1 score, etc. RESULTS: 11 variables were critical in the training phase, including educational level, depression, insomnia, age, Body Mass Index (BMI), medication count, gender, stenting, systolic blood pressure (sbp), neurosis and rapid eye movement. The XGBoost model exhibited superior performance compared with other models, achieving area under the curve of 0.915, sensitivity of 76.2% and specificity of 92.9%. The most influential predictors were educational level, total medication count, age, sbp and BMI.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The proposed classifier can help guide preclinical screening of AD in the elderly population.</p>","PeriodicalId":9158,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open","volume":"15 2","pages":"e092293"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2024-092293","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Alzheimer's disease (AD) poses a significant challenge for individuals aged 65 and older, being the most prevalent form of dementia. Although existing AD risk prediction tools demonstrate high accuracy, their complexity and limited accessibility restrict practical application. This study aimed to develop a convenience, efficient prediction model for AD risk using machine learning techniques.

Design and setting: We conducted a cross-sectional study with participants aged 60 and older from the National Alzheimer's Coordinating Center. We selected personal characteristics, clinical data and psychosocial factors as baseline predictors for AD (March 2015 to December 2021). The study utilised Random Forest and Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) algorithms alongside traditional logistic regression for modelling. An oversampling method was applied to balance the data set.

Interventions: This study has no interventions.

Participants: The study included 2379 participants, of whom 507 were diagnosed with AD.

Primary and secondary outcome measures: Including accuracy, precision, recall, F1 score, etc. RESULTS: 11 variables were critical in the training phase, including educational level, depression, insomnia, age, Body Mass Index (BMI), medication count, gender, stenting, systolic blood pressure (sbp), neurosis and rapid eye movement. The XGBoost model exhibited superior performance compared with other models, achieving area under the curve of 0.915, sensitivity of 76.2% and specificity of 92.9%. The most influential predictors were educational level, total medication count, age, sbp and BMI.

Conclusions: The proposed classifier can help guide preclinical screening of AD in the elderly population.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMJ Open
BMJ Open MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
3.40%
发文量
4510
审稿时长
2-3 weeks
期刊介绍: BMJ Open is an online, open access journal, dedicated to publishing medical research from all disciplines and therapeutic areas. The journal publishes all research study types, from study protocols to phase I trials to meta-analyses, including small or specialist studies. Publishing procedures are built around fully open peer review and continuous publication, publishing research online as soon as the article is ready.
期刊最新文献
Hospitalisation from seasonal influenza among persons with type 1 diabetes: a cohort study from the Swedish National Diabetes Register. Impact of moral distress on burn-out: a cross-sectional survey of front-line family physicians during the initial wave of the COVID-19 pandemic. Inequality in maternal delays related to maternal death at home and en route to a health facility in Ethiopia: insights from national mortality surveillance data. Key components in the professional ethics of sign language interpreters in healthcare contexts: a qualitative study in Colombia. Nurture-U student mental health longitudinal survey: a study protocol.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1