Advancing Alzheimer's disease risk prediction: development and validation of a machine learning-based preclinical screening model in a cross-sectional study.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL BMJ Open Pub Date : 2025-02-08 DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2024-092293
Bingsheng Wang, Ruihan Xie, Wenhao Qi, Jiani Yao, Yankai Shi, Xiajing Lou, Chaoqun Dong, Xiaohong Zhu, Bing Wang, Danni He, Yanfei Chen, Shihua Cao
{"title":"Advancing Alzheimer's disease risk prediction: development and validation of a machine learning-based preclinical screening model in a cross-sectional study.","authors":"Bingsheng Wang, Ruihan Xie, Wenhao Qi, Jiani Yao, Yankai Shi, Xiajing Lou, Chaoqun Dong, Xiaohong Zhu, Bing Wang, Danni He, Yanfei Chen, Shihua Cao","doi":"10.1136/bmjopen-2024-092293","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Alzheimer's disease (AD) poses a significant challenge for individuals aged 65 and older, being the most prevalent form of dementia. Although existing AD risk prediction tools demonstrate high accuracy, their complexity and limited accessibility restrict practical application. This study aimed to develop a convenience, efficient prediction model for AD risk using machine learning techniques.</p><p><strong>Design and setting: </strong>We conducted a cross-sectional study with participants aged 60 and older from the National Alzheimer's Coordinating Center. We selected personal characteristics, clinical data and psychosocial factors as baseline predictors for AD (March 2015 to December 2021). The study utilised Random Forest and Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) algorithms alongside traditional logistic regression for modelling. An oversampling method was applied to balance the data set.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>This study has no interventions.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>The study included 2379 participants, of whom 507 were diagnosed with AD.</p><p><strong>Primary and secondary outcome measures: </strong>Including accuracy, precision, recall, F1 score, etc. RESULTS: 11 variables were critical in the training phase, including educational level, depression, insomnia, age, Body Mass Index (BMI), medication count, gender, stenting, systolic blood pressure (sbp), neurosis and rapid eye movement. The XGBoost model exhibited superior performance compared with other models, achieving area under the curve of 0.915, sensitivity of 76.2% and specificity of 92.9%. The most influential predictors were educational level, total medication count, age, sbp and BMI.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The proposed classifier can help guide preclinical screening of AD in the elderly population.</p>","PeriodicalId":9158,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open","volume":"15 2","pages":"e092293"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12107635/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2024-092293","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Alzheimer's disease (AD) poses a significant challenge for individuals aged 65 and older, being the most prevalent form of dementia. Although existing AD risk prediction tools demonstrate high accuracy, their complexity and limited accessibility restrict practical application. This study aimed to develop a convenience, efficient prediction model for AD risk using machine learning techniques.

Design and setting: We conducted a cross-sectional study with participants aged 60 and older from the National Alzheimer's Coordinating Center. We selected personal characteristics, clinical data and psychosocial factors as baseline predictors for AD (March 2015 to December 2021). The study utilised Random Forest and Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) algorithms alongside traditional logistic regression for modelling. An oversampling method was applied to balance the data set.

Interventions: This study has no interventions.

Participants: The study included 2379 participants, of whom 507 were diagnosed with AD.

Primary and secondary outcome measures: Including accuracy, precision, recall, F1 score, etc. RESULTS: 11 variables were critical in the training phase, including educational level, depression, insomnia, age, Body Mass Index (BMI), medication count, gender, stenting, systolic blood pressure (sbp), neurosis and rapid eye movement. The XGBoost model exhibited superior performance compared with other models, achieving area under the curve of 0.915, sensitivity of 76.2% and specificity of 92.9%. The most influential predictors were educational level, total medication count, age, sbp and BMI.

Conclusions: The proposed classifier can help guide preclinical screening of AD in the elderly population.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
推进阿尔茨海默病风险预测:在横断面研究中基于机器学习的临床前筛选模型的开发和验证。
阿尔茨海默病(AD)对65岁及以上的个体构成了重大挑战,是最普遍的痴呆症形式。虽然现有的AD风险预测工具具有较高的准确性,但其复杂性和可及性限制了实际应用。本研究旨在利用机器学习技术开发一种方便、高效的AD风险预测模型。设计和环境:我们对来自国家阿尔茨海默病协调中心的60岁及以上的参与者进行了一项横断面研究。我们选择了个人特征、临床数据和社会心理因素作为AD的基线预测因素(2015年3月至2021年12月)。该研究利用随机森林和极端梯度增强(XGBoost)算法以及传统的逻辑回归进行建模。采用过采样方法平衡数据集。干预措施:本研究没有干预措施。参与者:该研究包括2379名参与者,其中507人被诊断为AD。主要和次要结局指标:包括准确率、精密度、召回率、F1评分等。结果:训练阶段有11个关键变量,包括教育程度、抑郁、失眠、年龄、体重指数(BMI)、用药数量、性别、支架置入术、收缩压(sbp)、神经症和快速眼动。与其他模型相比,XGBoost模型表现出更好的性能,曲线下面积为0.915,灵敏度为76.2%,特异度为92.9%。影响最大的预测因子为受教育程度、总用药次数、年龄、收缩压和BMI。结论:该分类器可以指导老年人群AD的临床前筛查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMJ Open
BMJ Open MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
3.40%
发文量
4510
审稿时长
2-3 weeks
期刊介绍: BMJ Open is an online, open access journal, dedicated to publishing medical research from all disciplines and therapeutic areas. The journal publishes all research study types, from study protocols to phase I trials to meta-analyses, including small or specialist studies. Publishing procedures are built around fully open peer review and continuous publication, publishing research online as soon as the article is ready.
期刊最新文献
Comparison of the revised Shock Index multiplied by the Glasgow Coma Scale and the Trauma and Injury Severity Score for predicting survival in paediatric patients with trauma: a nationwide retrospective cohort study in Japan. Developing recommendations for promoting wellbeing in individuals with alopecia areata: a modified Delphi study. Longitudinal study of childbirth readiness and its related factors and consequences among low-risk pregnant women attending health centres in Tabriz, Iran. Feasibility of the MAINTAIN intervention to support independence after a fall for people with dementia: a pilot cluster randomised controlled trial in participants' own homes. Feasibility of a mobile health intervention to motivate adolescent fitness and high-intensity exercise adherence (Motivating Adolescent Fitness (MOTAFIT)): protocol for a randomised controlled trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1