Insights into adverse events and safety profile of upadacitinib in the management of inflammatory bowel diseases - A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

IF 2.1 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Indian Journal of Gastroenterology Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-08 DOI:10.1007/s12664-024-01720-0
Bruna Thaytala Quintino Falcon, Tamires de Mello Guimaraes, Gabriele Alves Halpern, Cintia Gomes, Taisa de Mello Guimaraes
{"title":"Insights into adverse events and safety profile of upadacitinib in the management of inflammatory bowel diseases - A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.","authors":"Bruna Thaytala Quintino Falcon, Tamires de Mello Guimaraes, Gabriele Alves Halpern, Cintia Gomes, Taisa de Mello Guimaraes","doi":"10.1007/s12664-024-01720-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the incidence of serious adverse events (SAEs) in patients with Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC) treated with upadacitinib and examined secondary adverse events.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comprehensive search of PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library was conducted to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing upadacitinib with placebo in adults with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). The primary outcome was the incidence of SAEs, while secondary outcomes included specific adverse events. Risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Six RCTs, including 2611 patients, were analyzed. The incidence of SAEs did not significantly differ between upadacitinib (6.1%) and placebo (7%) (RR = 0.77; 95% CI: 0.50-1.20; p = 0.25). Secondary outcomes showed no significant differences in serious infections, hepatic disorders, nasopharyngitis or herpes zoster. However, neutropenia (RR = 5.63; 95% CI: 1.90-16.65; p = 0.0002) and creatine kinase elevation (RR = 2.34; 95% CI: 1.22-4.47; p = 0.01) were higher with upadacitinib, while anemia (RR = 0.36; 95% CI: 0.27-0.48; p < 0.00001) and arthralgia (RR = 0.47; 95% CI: 0.30-0.75; p = 0.001) were reduced.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Upadacitinib did not increase the overall risk of SAEs in IBD patients, with a notable reduction in anemia and arthralgia. However, the higher risks of neutropenia and CK elevation underscore the importance of monitoring. Further research is necessary to assess long-term safety, particularly regarding rare but serious events such as thromboembolism.</p>","PeriodicalId":13404,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Gastroenterology","volume":" ","pages":"154-162"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12664-024-01720-0","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the incidence of serious adverse events (SAEs) in patients with Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC) treated with upadacitinib and examined secondary adverse events.

Methods: A comprehensive search of PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library was conducted to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing upadacitinib with placebo in adults with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). The primary outcome was the incidence of SAEs, while secondary outcomes included specific adverse events. Risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated.

Results: Six RCTs, including 2611 patients, were analyzed. The incidence of SAEs did not significantly differ between upadacitinib (6.1%) and placebo (7%) (RR = 0.77; 95% CI: 0.50-1.20; p = 0.25). Secondary outcomes showed no significant differences in serious infections, hepatic disorders, nasopharyngitis or herpes zoster. However, neutropenia (RR = 5.63; 95% CI: 1.90-16.65; p = 0.0002) and creatine kinase elevation (RR = 2.34; 95% CI: 1.22-4.47; p = 0.01) were higher with upadacitinib, while anemia (RR = 0.36; 95% CI: 0.27-0.48; p < 0.00001) and arthralgia (RR = 0.47; 95% CI: 0.30-0.75; p = 0.001) were reduced.

Conclusion: Upadacitinib did not increase the overall risk of SAEs in IBD patients, with a notable reduction in anemia and arthralgia. However, the higher risks of neutropenia and CK elevation underscore the importance of monitoring. Further research is necessary to assess long-term safety, particularly regarding rare but serious events such as thromboembolism.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
upadacitinib治疗炎症性肠病的不良事件和安全性分析——随机对照试验的荟萃分析
背景:本系统综述和荟萃分析评估了upadacitinib治疗克罗恩病(CD)和溃疡性结肠炎(UC)患者严重不良事件(SAEs)的发生率,并检查了继发不良事件。方法:全面检索PubMed、Embase和Cochrane图书馆,以确定比较upadacitinib与安慰剂治疗成人炎症性肠病(IBD)的随机对照试验(RCTs)。主要结局是急性呼吸窘迫事件的发生率,次要结局包括特定的不良事件。计算风险比(RR)和95%置信区间(CI)。结果:共分析6项随机对照试验,共2611例患者。upadacitinib(6.1%)和安慰剂(7%)的SAEs发生率无显著差异(RR = 0.77;95% ci: 0.50-1.20;p = 0.25)。次要结局在严重感染、肝脏疾病、鼻咽炎或带状疱疹方面无显著差异。然而,中性粒细胞减少症(RR = 5.63;95% ci: 1.90-16.65;p = 0.0002)和肌酸激酶升高(RR = 2.34;95% ci: 1.22-4.47;p = 0.01),而贫血(RR = 0.36;95% ci: 0.27-0.48;结论:Upadacitinib不会增加IBD患者发生SAEs的总体风险,显著降低贫血和关节痛。然而,中性粒细胞减少和CK升高的高风险强调了监测的重要性。需要进一步的研究来评估长期安全性,特别是对于罕见但严重的事件,如血栓栓塞。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Indian Journal of Gastroenterology
Indian Journal of Gastroenterology GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
10.00%
发文量
73
期刊介绍: The Indian Journal of Gastroenterology aims to help doctors everywhere practise better medicine and to influence the debate on gastroenterology. To achieve these aims, we publish original scientific studies, state-of -the-art special articles, reports and papers commenting on the clinical, scientific and public health factors affecting aspects of gastroenterology. We shall be delighted to receive articles for publication in all of these categories and letters commenting on the contents of the Journal or on issues of interest to our readers.
期刊最新文献
Revisiting "The 'Obesity First' approach: Redefining the future of healthcare". The changing landscape of gastrointestinal cancers in India: An analysis involving published data from Cancer Incidence in Five Continents of 2013-2017 compared to 1988-1992. Supragastric belching: Evaluating the efficacy of short-term Ryle's tube placement and diaphragmatic breathing technique. Concentration-dependent effect of hydrogen peroxide on pancreatic necrosis: An ex vivo study. Letter to the Editor: Effect of endoscopic pre-aponeurotic repair of diastasis recti on gastroesophageal reflux symptoms.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1