{"title":"Oral versus subcutaneous semaglutide weight loss outcomes after two years among patients with type 2 diabetes in a real-world database.","authors":"Jimmy Kwon, Diana Thiara, Jonathan H Watanabe","doi":"10.1080/17446651.2025.2462100","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Interest has grown in glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor-agonist (GLP-1 RA) semaglutide long-term outcomes. This retrospective cohort study compared effectiveness of oral and subcutaneous semaglutide for weight loss outcomes in adults with type 2 diabetes (T2D) over a 2-year treatment period.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>Weight loss was evaluated through mean percentage change from baseline, proportion achieving at least 5% weight loss and at least 10% weight loss comparing subcutaneous (<i>n</i> = 310) versus oral users (<i>n</i> = 57) and by age group.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Subcutaneous users experienced a mean percentage weight loss of 7.5% (16.7 pounds) with 58.7% and 32.9% achieving ≥5% and ≥10% loss, respectively. Oral users lost 4.4% (8.7 pounds) with 50.9% and 17.5% achieving ≥5% and ≥10% loss, respectively. Significant differences existed between formulations in mean percentage weight change (p-value <0.01) and proportion achieving ≥10% loss (p-value = 0.03), but not in proportion achieving ≥5% loss (p-value = 0.34). Outcomes differed by age within oral semaglutide (p-value = 0.02). Regression analyses adjusted for confounders yielded similar findings.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Subcutaneous users achieved superior weight loss compared to oral users. Older oral users experienced better weight loss compared to younger users. However, no differences were observed between subcutaneous users.</p>","PeriodicalId":12107,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Endocrinology & Metabolism","volume":" ","pages":"1-6"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Review of Endocrinology & Metabolism","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17446651.2025.2462100","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Interest has grown in glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor-agonist (GLP-1 RA) semaglutide long-term outcomes. This retrospective cohort study compared effectiveness of oral and subcutaneous semaglutide for weight loss outcomes in adults with type 2 diabetes (T2D) over a 2-year treatment period.
Research design and methods: Weight loss was evaluated through mean percentage change from baseline, proportion achieving at least 5% weight loss and at least 10% weight loss comparing subcutaneous (n = 310) versus oral users (n = 57) and by age group.
Results: Subcutaneous users experienced a mean percentage weight loss of 7.5% (16.7 pounds) with 58.7% and 32.9% achieving ≥5% and ≥10% loss, respectively. Oral users lost 4.4% (8.7 pounds) with 50.9% and 17.5% achieving ≥5% and ≥10% loss, respectively. Significant differences existed between formulations in mean percentage weight change (p-value <0.01) and proportion achieving ≥10% loss (p-value = 0.03), but not in proportion achieving ≥5% loss (p-value = 0.34). Outcomes differed by age within oral semaglutide (p-value = 0.02). Regression analyses adjusted for confounders yielded similar findings.
Conclusion: Subcutaneous users achieved superior weight loss compared to oral users. Older oral users experienced better weight loss compared to younger users. However, no differences were observed between subcutaneous users.
期刊介绍:
Implicated in a plethora of regulatory dysfunctions involving growth and development, metabolism, electrolyte balances and reproduction, endocrine disruption is one of the highest priority research topics in the world. As a result, we are now in a position to better detect, characterize and overcome the damage mediated by adverse interaction with the endocrine system. Expert Review of Endocrinology and Metabolism (ISSN 1744-6651), provides extensive coverage of state-of-the-art research and clinical advancements in the field of endocrine control and metabolism, with a focus on screening, prevention, diagnostics, existing and novel therapeutics, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology and epidemiology.