Ronald M. Rapee PhD , Rebecca-Lee Kuhnert PhD , Ian Bowsher BEd , John R. Burns PhD , Jennifer Coen MEd , Julie Dixon MPH , Pauline Kotselas MA(Psych) , Catherine Lourey MA(Hons) , Lauren F. McLellan PhD , Cathrine Mihalopoulos PhD , Lorna Peters PhD , Traci Prendergast MCounsPsy , Tiffany Roos MBA , Danielle Thomas PGDip , Viviana M. Wuthrich MPsych(Clin), PhD
{"title":"A Cluster Randomized Trial of the Impact of School-Based, Universal, Mental Health Screening and Feedback on Students’ Mental Health and Help-Seeking","authors":"Ronald M. Rapee PhD , Rebecca-Lee Kuhnert PhD , Ian Bowsher BEd , John R. Burns PhD , Jennifer Coen MEd , Julie Dixon MPH , Pauline Kotselas MA(Psych) , Catherine Lourey MA(Hons) , Lauren F. McLellan PhD , Cathrine Mihalopoulos PhD , Lorna Peters PhD , Traci Prendergast MCounsPsy , Tiffany Roos MBA , Danielle Thomas PGDip , Viviana M. Wuthrich MPsych(Clin), PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.jaac.2025.01.032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div><span>Most children and adolescents with mental disorders do not access appropriate help, facilitating a lifetime of entrenched difficulties. School-based, universal, </span>mental health<span> screening has been used as one method to increase pediatric service use and subsequently reduce mental health problems. Despite its popularity, there are no randomized trials that demonstrate the efficacy of this method to improve pediatric mental health.</span></div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>The current trial randomly allocated 84 schools, of which 53 provided data (10,660 students; aged 7.4-19.0 years) across the state of New South Wales, Australia, to receive either immediate screening with caregiver feedback or no screening. Approximately 12 months later, students in all schools were assessed for mental health, service use, and school attendance.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>At 12 months, students enrolled in schools that received screening with feedback 12 months earlier self-reported lower total mental health difficulties (primary outcome) than students enrolled in schools that did not engage in screening (mean difference= 0.09, SE = 0.02, t(6,713) = 3.78, <em>p</em> < .001, 95% CI difference = 0.04 to 0.13). Interestingly, the groups did not differ significantly on use of mental health services over the previous year (primary outcome) (mean difference = 0.00, SE = 0.02, t(6,707) = 0.19, <em>p</em><span> = .851, 95% CI difference = −0.04 to 0.03). Schools that engaged in screening reported fewer days’ absence for students than did control schools.</span></div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This is the first randomized trial indicating that school-based screening with feedback to caregivers may reduce mental health difficulties, although the mechanism through which this occurs remains unclear.</div></div><div><h3>Plain language summary</h3><div>This study randomly allocated 84 Australian schools, of whom 53 provided data (n = 10,660 students aged 7-19 years), to receive either immediate mental health screening with caregiver feedback or no screening. One year later students in schools that received the intervention reported better mental health, though the students who received screening did not use more mental health resources in the past year. Students who received screening also had better school attendance than students from control schools. The effect sizes for these relative improvements at one year were small.</div></div><div><h3>Study preregistration information</h3><div>Development and validation of a universal mental health screening tool and follow-up referral system to identify at-risk students in Australian schools; <span><span>https://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=380905</span><svg><path></path></svg></span></div></div>","PeriodicalId":17186,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry","volume":"64 11","pages":"Pages 1295-1304"},"PeriodicalIF":9.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0890856725000681","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective
Most children and adolescents with mental disorders do not access appropriate help, facilitating a lifetime of entrenched difficulties. School-based, universal, mental health screening has been used as one method to increase pediatric service use and subsequently reduce mental health problems. Despite its popularity, there are no randomized trials that demonstrate the efficacy of this method to improve pediatric mental health.
Method
The current trial randomly allocated 84 schools, of which 53 provided data (10,660 students; aged 7.4-19.0 years) across the state of New South Wales, Australia, to receive either immediate screening with caregiver feedback or no screening. Approximately 12 months later, students in all schools were assessed for mental health, service use, and school attendance.
Results
At 12 months, students enrolled in schools that received screening with feedback 12 months earlier self-reported lower total mental health difficulties (primary outcome) than students enrolled in schools that did not engage in screening (mean difference= 0.09, SE = 0.02, t(6,713) = 3.78, p < .001, 95% CI difference = 0.04 to 0.13). Interestingly, the groups did not differ significantly on use of mental health services over the previous year (primary outcome) (mean difference = 0.00, SE = 0.02, t(6,707) = 0.19, p = .851, 95% CI difference = −0.04 to 0.03). Schools that engaged in screening reported fewer days’ absence for students than did control schools.
Conclusion
This is the first randomized trial indicating that school-based screening with feedback to caregivers may reduce mental health difficulties, although the mechanism through which this occurs remains unclear.
Plain language summary
This study randomly allocated 84 Australian schools, of whom 53 provided data (n = 10,660 students aged 7-19 years), to receive either immediate mental health screening with caregiver feedback or no screening. One year later students in schools that received the intervention reported better mental health, though the students who received screening did not use more mental health resources in the past year. Students who received screening also had better school attendance than students from control schools. The effect sizes for these relative improvements at one year were small.
Study preregistration information
Development and validation of a universal mental health screening tool and follow-up referral system to identify at-risk students in Australian schools; https://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=380905
期刊介绍:
The Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry (JAACAP) is dedicated to advancing the field of child and adolescent psychiatry through the publication of original research and papers of theoretical, scientific, and clinical significance. Our primary focus is on the mental health of children, adolescents, and families.
We welcome unpublished manuscripts that explore various perspectives, ranging from genetic, epidemiological, neurobiological, and psychopathological research, to cognitive, behavioral, psychodynamic, and other psychotherapeutic investigations. We also encourage submissions that delve into parent-child, interpersonal, and family research, as well as clinical and empirical studies conducted in inpatient, outpatient, consultation-liaison, and school-based settings.
In addition to publishing research, we aim to promote the well-being of children and families by featuring scholarly papers on topics such as health policy, legislation, advocacy, culture, society, and service provision in relation to mental health.
At JAACAP, we strive to foster collaboration and dialogue among researchers, clinicians, and policy-makers in order to enhance our understanding and approach to child and adolescent mental health.