Results of Anatomic Total Shoulder Arthroplasty with the Arthrex Eclipse Stemless Humeral Implant in Patients Over 70.

IF 2.9 2区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Pub Date : 2025-02-05 DOI:10.1016/j.jse.2024.12.037
Mark T Dillon, Patrick J Denard, Brian C Werner
{"title":"Results of Anatomic Total Shoulder Arthroplasty with the Arthrex Eclipse Stemless Humeral Implant in Patients Over 70.","authors":"Mark T Dillon, Patrick J Denard, Brian C Werner","doi":"10.1016/j.jse.2024.12.037","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (aTSA) is a well described technique for addressing glenohumeral osteoarthritis. Little has been written on outcomes for newer stemless humeral implants in older patients, with none looking specifically at an implant relying on screw fixation. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the clinical and radiographic outcomes for patients over 70 years of age undergoing aTSA with the Eclipse (Arthrex Inc., Naples, FL, USA) stemless humeral component.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective review utilizing a multicenter shoulder arthroplasty registry was performed evaluating all patients over 70 who underwent aTSA with a stemless humeral implant for a diagnosis of glenohumeral osteoarthritis and had a minimum follow-up of 2 years. Thirty-seven patients met the study criteria and were matched for comparative analysis to 37 patients 65 years of age and younger. Outcome scores were obtained preoperatively and at 2 years postoperatively using the VAS (Visual Analog Scale), Constant-Murley, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) and Western Ontario Osteoarthritis Index (WOOS) scores. The percentage of patients in each group who exceeded the MCID for the ASES and WOOS was reported. When available, postoperative radiographs were evaluated for the presence of radiolucent lines and calcar resorption.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was a statistically significantly higher preoperative WOOS score in the older patient group, otherwise there was not statistical difference between the two groups in regards to baseline scores or range of motion. At two-year follow-up, older patients were noted to have significantly better VAS, ASES, WOOS, and Constant-Murley scores when compared to younger patients (p < .05). All patients over the age of 70 achieved MCID for the ASES compared to 84% of those 65 and younger (p=0.011), while for the WOOS 100% of older patients achieved MCID compared to 86% of those in the control group (p=0.022). Postoperative range of motion was not significantly different between the two groups, although older patients had better active internal rotation at 90 degrees of abduction (p=.002). Partial calcar resorption was noted in one patient in each age group. Radiolucent lines were noted in two patients over the age of 70 and one patient in under 65.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Patients over the age of 70 with glenohumeral osteoarthritis undergoing aTSA with a stemless humeral component have equivalent, if not better, outcomes when compared to younger patients. Age alone does not appear a limitation for stemless aTSA.</p>","PeriodicalId":50051,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2024.12.037","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (aTSA) is a well described technique for addressing glenohumeral osteoarthritis. Little has been written on outcomes for newer stemless humeral implants in older patients, with none looking specifically at an implant relying on screw fixation. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the clinical and radiographic outcomes for patients over 70 years of age undergoing aTSA with the Eclipse (Arthrex Inc., Naples, FL, USA) stemless humeral component.

Methods: A retrospective review utilizing a multicenter shoulder arthroplasty registry was performed evaluating all patients over 70 who underwent aTSA with a stemless humeral implant for a diagnosis of glenohumeral osteoarthritis and had a minimum follow-up of 2 years. Thirty-seven patients met the study criteria and were matched for comparative analysis to 37 patients 65 years of age and younger. Outcome scores were obtained preoperatively and at 2 years postoperatively using the VAS (Visual Analog Scale), Constant-Murley, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) and Western Ontario Osteoarthritis Index (WOOS) scores. The percentage of patients in each group who exceeded the MCID for the ASES and WOOS was reported. When available, postoperative radiographs were evaluated for the presence of radiolucent lines and calcar resorption.

Results: There was a statistically significantly higher preoperative WOOS score in the older patient group, otherwise there was not statistical difference between the two groups in regards to baseline scores or range of motion. At two-year follow-up, older patients were noted to have significantly better VAS, ASES, WOOS, and Constant-Murley scores when compared to younger patients (p < .05). All patients over the age of 70 achieved MCID for the ASES compared to 84% of those 65 and younger (p=0.011), while for the WOOS 100% of older patients achieved MCID compared to 86% of those in the control group (p=0.022). Postoperative range of motion was not significantly different between the two groups, although older patients had better active internal rotation at 90 degrees of abduction (p=.002). Partial calcar resorption was noted in one patient in each age group. Radiolucent lines were noted in two patients over the age of 70 and one patient in under 65.

Discussion: Patients over the age of 70 with glenohumeral osteoarthritis undergoing aTSA with a stemless humeral component have equivalent, if not better, outcomes when compared to younger patients. Age alone does not appear a limitation for stemless aTSA.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
23.30%
发文量
604
审稿时长
11.2 weeks
期刊介绍: The official publication for eight leading specialty organizations, this authoritative journal is the only publication to focus exclusively on medical, surgical, and physical techniques for treating injury/disease of the upper extremity, including the shoulder girdle, arm, and elbow. Clinically oriented and peer-reviewed, the Journal provides an international forum for the exchange of information on new techniques, instruments, and materials. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery features vivid photos, professional illustrations, and explicit diagrams that demonstrate surgical approaches and depict implant devices. Topics covered include fractures, dislocations, diseases and injuries of the rotator cuff, imaging techniques, arthritis, arthroscopy, arthroplasty, and rehabilitation.
期刊最新文献
Acute Open Reduction and Internal Fixation versus Non-Operative Treatment of Scapular Spine Fractures after Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty: A Propensity Score-Matched Study. Developing a three-dimensional convolutional neural network for full volume auto-segmentation of shoulder Dixon MRI with comparison to Goutallier classification and two-dimensional muscle quality assessment. Predicting good clinical outcomes after revision rotator cuff repair: the revision cuff repair prediction score. Proximal Humeral Fractures in Patients Over 60 Years Old: A Randomized Study of Non-Operative versus Operative Treatment with Locking Plate. Results of Anatomic Total Shoulder Arthroplasty with the Arthrex Eclipse Stemless Humeral Implant in Patients Over 70.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1