Capturing the Additional Cardiovascular Benefits of SGLT2 Inhibitors and GLP-1 Receptor Agonists Beyond the Control of Traditional Risk Factors in People with Diabetes.

IF 4.9 2区 医学 Q1 ECONOMICS Value in Health Pub Date : 2025-02-06 DOI:10.1016/j.jval.2025.01.015
Shu Niu, Dawei Guan, Lizheng Shi, Vivian Fonseca, Mikael Svensson, Mohammed K Ali, Yan V Sun, Xin Hu, Chang Su, Carl Yang, Hui Shao
{"title":"Capturing the Additional Cardiovascular Benefits of SGLT2 Inhibitors and GLP-1 Receptor Agonists Beyond the Control of Traditional Risk Factors in People with Diabetes.","authors":"Shu Niu, Dawei Guan, Lizheng Shi, Vivian Fonseca, Mikael Svensson, Mohammed K Ali, Yan V Sun, Xin Hu, Chang Su, Carl Yang, Hui Shao","doi":"10.1016/j.jval.2025.01.015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to quantify the additional cardioprotective effects of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2is) and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) beyond the traditional risk factors control in individuals with type 2 diabetes (T2D). This helps calibrate the BRAVO diabetes simulation model to capture the total cardiovascular benefits of new diabetes medications accurately.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We extracted patient characteristics and treatment efficacy data from four cardiovascular outcomes trials (CVOTs) of SGLT2is and four CVOTs of GLP-1RAs completed before May 2023. Using the BRAVO diabetes simulation model, we translated reductions in traditional risk factors (i.e., glycated hemoglobin; systolic blood pressure; low-density lipids; body mass index) from the newer drugs into risk reductions in cardiovascular outcomes (i.e., myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, congestive heart failure (CHF), and mortality) assuming the drug-associated risk reductions are only driven by traditional risk factors. Then we compared the simulated risk-factor-driven risk reductions of cardiovascular outcomes with observed risk reductions from the trials and calculated drug-specific incremental benefits (DIB).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After accounting for the cardiovascular effects from traditional risk factors control, SGLT2is was associated with an additional 19% risk reduction in CHF (DIB: 0.81, 95% CI: 0.72-0.90). Furthermore, the uncalibrated model predicted a risk reduction in stroke with SGLT2is, which was not observed in CVOTs. This discrepancy highlights the need for an SGLT2i-specific calibrator to align the simulation results with the observed outcomes. In contrast, no additional cardiovascular benefit was associated with GLP-1RAs after controlling for traditional risk factors.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study revealed that SGLT2is could further reduce CHF risks beyond the control of traditional risk factors but may offer additional pathways to offset overall benefits from traditional risk factor control in stroke risks. No additional cardiovascular benefits were observed for GLP-1RAs beyond traditional risk factor control. The BRAVO model calibration enhances cardiovascular outcome prediction with these newer antidiabetic therapies.</p>","PeriodicalId":23508,"journal":{"name":"Value in Health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Value in Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2025.01.015","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to quantify the additional cardioprotective effects of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2is) and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) beyond the traditional risk factors control in individuals with type 2 diabetes (T2D). This helps calibrate the BRAVO diabetes simulation model to capture the total cardiovascular benefits of new diabetes medications accurately.

Methods: We extracted patient characteristics and treatment efficacy data from four cardiovascular outcomes trials (CVOTs) of SGLT2is and four CVOTs of GLP-1RAs completed before May 2023. Using the BRAVO diabetes simulation model, we translated reductions in traditional risk factors (i.e., glycated hemoglobin; systolic blood pressure; low-density lipids; body mass index) from the newer drugs into risk reductions in cardiovascular outcomes (i.e., myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, congestive heart failure (CHF), and mortality) assuming the drug-associated risk reductions are only driven by traditional risk factors. Then we compared the simulated risk-factor-driven risk reductions of cardiovascular outcomes with observed risk reductions from the trials and calculated drug-specific incremental benefits (DIB).

Results: After accounting for the cardiovascular effects from traditional risk factors control, SGLT2is was associated with an additional 19% risk reduction in CHF (DIB: 0.81, 95% CI: 0.72-0.90). Furthermore, the uncalibrated model predicted a risk reduction in stroke with SGLT2is, which was not observed in CVOTs. This discrepancy highlights the need for an SGLT2i-specific calibrator to align the simulation results with the observed outcomes. In contrast, no additional cardiovascular benefit was associated with GLP-1RAs after controlling for traditional risk factors.

Conclusion: Our study revealed that SGLT2is could further reduce CHF risks beyond the control of traditional risk factors but may offer additional pathways to offset overall benefits from traditional risk factor control in stroke risks. No additional cardiovascular benefits were observed for GLP-1RAs beyond traditional risk factor control. The BRAVO model calibration enhances cardiovascular outcome prediction with these newer antidiabetic therapies.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Value in Health
Value in Health 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
6.70%
发文量
3064
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Value in Health contains original research articles for pharmacoeconomics, health economics, and outcomes research (clinical, economic, and patient-reported outcomes/preference-based research), as well as conceptual and health policy articles that provide valuable information for health care decision-makers as well as the research community. As the official journal of ISPOR, Value in Health provides a forum for researchers, as well as health care decision-makers to translate outcomes research into health care decisions.
期刊最新文献
Role of Health Equity in Health Technology Assessment Process in Asia: A Landscape Analysis of 13 Health Systems in Asia. Understanding the economic value of interventions that address perinatal mental health problems: Literature review and methodological considerations. Are Updated COVID-19 Vaccines Still Relevant for all Adult Age Groups? An Economic Evaluation of the Monovalent XBB.1.5 Vaccine in Australia. Capturing the Additional Cardiovascular Benefits of SGLT2 Inhibitors and GLP-1 Receptor Agonists Beyond the Control of Traditional Risk Factors in People with Diabetes. Cost-effectiveness of a digitally supported care management program for caregivers of people with dementia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1