Considering a Functional Conceptualisation of Avoidant/Restrictive Food Intake Disorder (ARFID): A Systematic Scoping Review of Emerging Evidence on ARFID.

IF 3.9 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY European Eating Disorders Review Pub Date : 2025-02-08 DOI:10.1002/erv.3180
Yvette Karvay
{"title":"Considering a Functional Conceptualisation of Avoidant/Restrictive Food Intake Disorder (ARFID): A Systematic Scoping Review of Emerging Evidence on ARFID.","authors":"Yvette Karvay","doi":"10.1002/erv.3180","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder (ARFID) only recently emerged in the DSM-5 and ICD-11. Relatedly, emerging conceptualisations of ARFID are equivocal. A functional conceptualisation of ARFID (i.e., cohesive conceptualisation that can guide research and clinical work) is needed. The present systematic scoping review aimed to synthesise ARFID literature to develop a functional conceptualisation model with recommendations for ongoing research and clinical work.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Utilising PRISMA guidelines, 25 references were found eligible for inclusion and categorised using a bottom-up approach into 6 (not mutually exclusive) conceptualisations of ARFID: clinical presentation subtypes (n = 16), symptom presentation (n = 4), biological (n = 3), behavioural (n = 4), learning (n = 3), and biopsychosocial (n = 4) models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Conceptually, both clinical presentation subtype and biopsychosocial models posed important avenues for further exploration of the aetiology, maintenance, and treatment of ARFID. Clinical presentation subtype models were most common, echoing and extending previous research support for the DSM's subtype categorisation. Biopsychosocial models were agnostic to ARFID subtypes, but encompassed elements of the biological, behavioural, and learning models, and suggested factors related to the aetiology and maintenance of ARFID subtypes.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Together, these conceptualisations allow for streamlined, nuanced research and clinical work aimed at understanding and treating ARFID.</p>","PeriodicalId":48117,"journal":{"name":"European Eating Disorders Review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Eating Disorders Review","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/erv.3180","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder (ARFID) only recently emerged in the DSM-5 and ICD-11. Relatedly, emerging conceptualisations of ARFID are equivocal. A functional conceptualisation of ARFID (i.e., cohesive conceptualisation that can guide research and clinical work) is needed. The present systematic scoping review aimed to synthesise ARFID literature to develop a functional conceptualisation model with recommendations for ongoing research and clinical work.

Method: Utilising PRISMA guidelines, 25 references were found eligible for inclusion and categorised using a bottom-up approach into 6 (not mutually exclusive) conceptualisations of ARFID: clinical presentation subtypes (n = 16), symptom presentation (n = 4), biological (n = 3), behavioural (n = 4), learning (n = 3), and biopsychosocial (n = 4) models.

Results: Conceptually, both clinical presentation subtype and biopsychosocial models posed important avenues for further exploration of the aetiology, maintenance, and treatment of ARFID. Clinical presentation subtype models were most common, echoing and extending previous research support for the DSM's subtype categorisation. Biopsychosocial models were agnostic to ARFID subtypes, but encompassed elements of the biological, behavioural, and learning models, and suggested factors related to the aetiology and maintenance of ARFID subtypes.

Discussion: Together, these conceptualisations allow for streamlined, nuanced research and clinical work aimed at understanding and treating ARFID.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
European Eating Disorders Review
European Eating Disorders Review PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
7.50%
发文量
81
期刊介绍: European Eating Disorders Review publishes authoritative and accessible articles, from all over the world, which review or report original research that has implications for the treatment and care of people with eating disorders, and articles which report innovations and experience in the clinical management of eating disorders. The journal focuses on implications for best practice in diagnosis and treatment. The journal also provides a forum for discussion of the causes and prevention of eating disorders, and related health policy. The aims of the journal are to offer a channel of communication between researchers, practitioners, administrators and policymakers who need to report and understand developments in the field of eating disorders.
期刊最新文献
User Experience and Therapeutic Alliance of Treatment Completers of Clinician-Supported Versus Self-Help Online Intervention for Eating Disorders: A Mixed Methods Approach. Considering a Functional Conceptualisation of Avoidant/Restrictive Food Intake Disorder (ARFID): A Systematic Scoping Review of Emerging Evidence on ARFID. Issue Information A Meaning-Centered Intervention for Undergraduate Women With High Weight and Shape Concerns-Replication of a Randomized Controlled Trial. Oxytocin Amplifies Negative Response to Ambiguity in Adolescent Females With and Without Eating Disorders.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1