Considering a Functional Conceptualisation of Avoidant/Restrictive Food Intake Disorder (ARFID): A Systematic Scoping Review of Emerging Evidence on ARFID.
{"title":"Considering a Functional Conceptualisation of Avoidant/Restrictive Food Intake Disorder (ARFID): A Systematic Scoping Review of Emerging Evidence on ARFID.","authors":"Yvette Karvay","doi":"10.1002/erv.3180","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder (ARFID) only recently emerged in the DSM-5 and ICD-11. Relatedly, emerging conceptualisations of ARFID are equivocal. A functional conceptualisation of ARFID (i.e., cohesive conceptualisation that can guide research and clinical work) is needed. The present systematic scoping review aimed to synthesise ARFID literature to develop a functional conceptualisation model with recommendations for ongoing research and clinical work.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Utilising PRISMA guidelines, 25 references were found eligible for inclusion and categorised using a bottom-up approach into 6 (not mutually exclusive) conceptualisations of ARFID: clinical presentation subtypes (n = 16), symptom presentation (n = 4), biological (n = 3), behavioural (n = 4), learning (n = 3), and biopsychosocial (n = 4) models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Conceptually, both clinical presentation subtype and biopsychosocial models posed important avenues for further exploration of the aetiology, maintenance, and treatment of ARFID. Clinical presentation subtype models were most common, echoing and extending previous research support for the DSM's subtype categorisation. Biopsychosocial models were agnostic to ARFID subtypes, but encompassed elements of the biological, behavioural, and learning models, and suggested factors related to the aetiology and maintenance of ARFID subtypes.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Together, these conceptualisations allow for streamlined, nuanced research and clinical work aimed at understanding and treating ARFID.</p>","PeriodicalId":48117,"journal":{"name":"European Eating Disorders Review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Eating Disorders Review","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/erv.3180","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder (ARFID) only recently emerged in the DSM-5 and ICD-11. Relatedly, emerging conceptualisations of ARFID are equivocal. A functional conceptualisation of ARFID (i.e., cohesive conceptualisation that can guide research and clinical work) is needed. The present systematic scoping review aimed to synthesise ARFID literature to develop a functional conceptualisation model with recommendations for ongoing research and clinical work.
Method: Utilising PRISMA guidelines, 25 references were found eligible for inclusion and categorised using a bottom-up approach into 6 (not mutually exclusive) conceptualisations of ARFID: clinical presentation subtypes (n = 16), symptom presentation (n = 4), biological (n = 3), behavioural (n = 4), learning (n = 3), and biopsychosocial (n = 4) models.
Results: Conceptually, both clinical presentation subtype and biopsychosocial models posed important avenues for further exploration of the aetiology, maintenance, and treatment of ARFID. Clinical presentation subtype models were most common, echoing and extending previous research support for the DSM's subtype categorisation. Biopsychosocial models were agnostic to ARFID subtypes, but encompassed elements of the biological, behavioural, and learning models, and suggested factors related to the aetiology and maintenance of ARFID subtypes.
Discussion: Together, these conceptualisations allow for streamlined, nuanced research and clinical work aimed at understanding and treating ARFID.
期刊介绍:
European Eating Disorders Review publishes authoritative and accessible articles, from all over the world, which review or report original research that has implications for the treatment and care of people with eating disorders, and articles which report innovations and experience in the clinical management of eating disorders. The journal focuses on implications for best practice in diagnosis and treatment. The journal also provides a forum for discussion of the causes and prevention of eating disorders, and related health policy. The aims of the journal are to offer a channel of communication between researchers, practitioners, administrators and policymakers who need to report and understand developments in the field of eating disorders.