Are paraspinal muscle morphology and composition associated with lumbar spinal stenosis? A systematic review

IF 4.7 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Spine Journal Pub Date : 2025-02-07 DOI:10.1016/j.spinee.2025.01.027
Aliyu Lawan PhD, Zakari Crites Videman BA, Anna Belay MPT, Shaima Behery MPT, Suzan Ibrahim MPT, Tiana Ulrich MPT, Kishanthiny Varatharaja MPT, Michele C. Battié PhD
{"title":"Are paraspinal muscle morphology and composition associated with lumbar spinal stenosis? A systematic review","authors":"Aliyu Lawan PhD,&nbsp;Zakari Crites Videman BA,&nbsp;Anna Belay MPT,&nbsp;Shaima Behery MPT,&nbsp;Suzan Ibrahim MPT,&nbsp;Tiana Ulrich MPT,&nbsp;Kishanthiny Varatharaja MPT,&nbsp;Michele C. Battié PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.spinee.2025.01.027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>BACKGROUND</h3><div>There has been increasing interest in associations between paraspinal muscle phenotypes and common spinal disorders, including lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS). However, the relation of paraspinal muscle morphology and composition with LSS is unclear.</div></div><div><h3>OBJECTIVES</h3><div>To provide a systematic overview and synthesis of current evidence on the association of paraspinal muscle morphology and composition with LSS presence, pain and disability or function.</div></div><div><h3>DESIGN</h3><div>Systematic review.</div></div><div><h3>METHODS</h3><div>Relevant studies were identified from a search of EMBASE, PubMed, SPORTDiscuss, Cinahl, Web of Science and PEDro. Relevant studies were selected, data were extracted, and risk of bias was assessed by 2 independent reviewers prior to conducting a narrative synthesis to summarize evidence using GRADE considerations. The study protocol was prospectively registered (Prospero: CRD42021246492).</div></div><div><h3>RESULTS</h3><div>Of 33 studies included in the review, multifidus (n=22) was most frequently studied, followed by psoas (n=10). Fatty infiltration (20 studies), CSA (n=11) and relative CSA (n=10) were the most studied paraspinal phenotypes. Most studies (n=31) had low risk of bias, with selection and confounding bias (n=13) most common. High variability in approaches used to measure muscle morphology and composition and LSS disability and pain, and variable control of confounding factors, created challenges in synthesizing findings. The only association identified for which there was moderate certainty of evidence was between increased multifidus fatty infiltration and the presence of LSS (4 of 6 studies). All other associations studied with high or moderate strength of evidence demonstrated no association, including no association between multifidus fatty infiltration and pain severity (8 studies), multifidus CSA and LSS disability (7 studies), psoas morphology and LSS anatomical severity (4 studies), or psoas composition and LSS pain severity (4 studies) for which there was high certainty. There was moderate certainty of no association between multifidus morphology and LSS pain severity (5 of 7 studies), and erector spinae morphology and pain severity (3 studies), and erector spinae composition and LSS pain severity (3 studies) and function (3 studies). Other associations remain more unclear.</div></div><div><h3>CONCLUSION</h3><div>Largely consistent results suggest multifidus fatty infiltration is associated with the presence of LSS. However, other specific associations examined with high or moderate certainty of evidence demonstrated no association, and others remain largely undetermined. Although interest has grown in paraspinal muscle morphology and composition for improved phenotyping, prognosis and treatment of common spinal disorders, the clinical utility of paraspinal muscle imaging in LSS remains unclear.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49484,"journal":{"name":"Spine Journal","volume":"25 8","pages":"Pages 1794-1820"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1529943025000701","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND

There has been increasing interest in associations between paraspinal muscle phenotypes and common spinal disorders, including lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS). However, the relation of paraspinal muscle morphology and composition with LSS is unclear.

OBJECTIVES

To provide a systematic overview and synthesis of current evidence on the association of paraspinal muscle morphology and composition with LSS presence, pain and disability or function.

DESIGN

Systematic review.

METHODS

Relevant studies were identified from a search of EMBASE, PubMed, SPORTDiscuss, Cinahl, Web of Science and PEDro. Relevant studies were selected, data were extracted, and risk of bias was assessed by 2 independent reviewers prior to conducting a narrative synthesis to summarize evidence using GRADE considerations. The study protocol was prospectively registered (Prospero: CRD42021246492).

RESULTS

Of 33 studies included in the review, multifidus (n=22) was most frequently studied, followed by psoas (n=10). Fatty infiltration (20 studies), CSA (n=11) and relative CSA (n=10) were the most studied paraspinal phenotypes. Most studies (n=31) had low risk of bias, with selection and confounding bias (n=13) most common. High variability in approaches used to measure muscle morphology and composition and LSS disability and pain, and variable control of confounding factors, created challenges in synthesizing findings. The only association identified for which there was moderate certainty of evidence was between increased multifidus fatty infiltration and the presence of LSS (4 of 6 studies). All other associations studied with high or moderate strength of evidence demonstrated no association, including no association between multifidus fatty infiltration and pain severity (8 studies), multifidus CSA and LSS disability (7 studies), psoas morphology and LSS anatomical severity (4 studies), or psoas composition and LSS pain severity (4 studies) for which there was high certainty. There was moderate certainty of no association between multifidus morphology and LSS pain severity (5 of 7 studies), and erector spinae morphology and pain severity (3 studies), and erector spinae composition and LSS pain severity (3 studies) and function (3 studies). Other associations remain more unclear.

CONCLUSION

Largely consistent results suggest multifidus fatty infiltration is associated with the presence of LSS. However, other specific associations examined with high or moderate certainty of evidence demonstrated no association, and others remain largely undetermined. Although interest has grown in paraspinal muscle morphology and composition for improved phenotyping, prognosis and treatment of common spinal disorders, the clinical utility of paraspinal muscle imaging in LSS remains unclear.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
棘旁肌的形态和组成与腰椎管狭窄有关吗?系统回顾。
背景:人们对棘旁肌表型与常见脊柱疾病(包括腰椎管狭窄症(LSS))之间的关系越来越感兴趣。然而,棘旁肌的形态和组成与LSS的关系尚不清楚。目的:对棘旁肌形态和组成与LSS存在、疼痛和残疾或功能之间的关系提供系统的概述和综合的现有证据。方法:相关研究从EMBASE、PubMed、SPORTDiscuss、Cinahl、Web of Science和PEDro中检索。选择相关研究,提取数据,并在进行叙述性综合以使用GRADE考虑因素总结证据之前,由两名独立审稿人评估偏倚风险。该研究方案已前瞻性注册(Prospero: CRD42021246492)。结果:在纳入的33项研究中,多裂肌(n=22)是最常见的研究,其次是腰肌(n=10)。脂肪浸润(20项研究)、CSA (n=11)和相对CSA (n=10)是研究最多的棘旁表型。大多数研究(n=31)偏倚风险较低,选择偏倚和混杂偏倚(n=13)最为常见。测量肌肉形态和组成、LSS残疾和疼痛的方法的高度可变性,以及混杂因素的可变控制,给综合研究结果带来了挑战。唯一确定的有中度确定性证据的关联是多裂肌脂肪浸润增加与LSS存在之间的关联(6项研究中的4项)。所有其他具有高强度或中等强度证据的关联研究均显示无关联,包括多裂肌脂肪浸润与疼痛严重程度(8项研究)、多裂肌CSA与LSS残疾(7项研究)、腰肌形态与LSS解剖严重程度(4项研究)、腰肌组成与LSS疼痛严重程度(4项研究)之间无关联,这些研究都有很高的确定性。多裂肌形态与LSS疼痛严重程度(7项研究中的5项)、竖脊肌形态与疼痛严重程度(3项研究)、竖脊肌组成与LSS疼痛严重程度(3项研究)和功能(3项研究)之间没有中度相关性。其他关联仍不清楚。结论:基本一致的结果表明多裂肌脂肪浸润与LSS的存在有关。然而,其他具有高或中等确定性证据的特定关联表明没有关联,而其他关联在很大程度上仍未确定。尽管人们对棘旁肌形态和组成的研究越来越感兴趣,以改善常见脊柱疾病的表型、预后和治疗,但棘旁肌成像在LSS中的临床应用仍不清楚。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Spine Journal
Spine Journal 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
6.70%
发文量
680
审稿时长
13.1 weeks
期刊介绍: The Spine Journal, the official journal of the North American Spine Society, is an international and multidisciplinary journal that publishes original, peer-reviewed articles on research and treatment related to the spine and spine care, including basic science and clinical investigations. It is a condition of publication that manuscripts submitted to The Spine Journal have not been published, and will not be simultaneously submitted or published elsewhere. The Spine Journal also publishes major reviews of specific topics by acknowledged authorities, technical notes, teaching editorials, and other special features, Letters to the Editor-in-Chief are encouraged.
期刊最新文献
Performance of EQ-5D-3L to EQ-5D-5L Crosswalk and Reverse Crosswalk in Lumbar Spine Surgery Patients. Infections in non-instrumented spine surgery: is the discontinuation of antibiotic prophylaxis to blame? Chronic low back pain is associated with remotely collected gait quality and quantity parameters from a wrist-worn accelerometer. Cost Comparisons and Perioperative Outcomes in the Surgical Treatment of Tandem Spinal Stenosis. Spontaneous atlantoaxial facet joint autofusion after posterior C1-2 fusion.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1