Drifa Frostadottir*, Charlotte Welinder, Raquel Perez and Lars B. Dahlin,
{"title":"Refinement of Protein Extraction Protocols for Human Peripheral Nerve Tissue","authors":"Drifa Frostadottir*, Charlotte Welinder, Raquel Perez and Lars B. Dahlin, ","doi":"10.1021/acsomega.4c1137310.1021/acsomega.4c11373","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >Our aim was to establish an effective method for protein extraction from freshly frozen human peripheral nerves, determine the minimum amount required for consistent protein extraction outcomes, and assess which method produced the highest number of protein identities. Five extraction methods were compared using 8 M urea and Ripa buffer using either the Bullet Blender or Bioruptor. Out of the total 2619 identified proteins, protein extraction using the Ripa buffer combined with either Bioruptor or Bullet Blender resulted in the identification of 1582 (60%) and 1615 (62%) proteins, respectively. In contrast, using 8 M urea and Bioruptor for protein extraction resulted in 1022 proteins (39%), whereas employing Bullet Blender yielded 1446 proteins (55%). Sample amounts, ranging from 0.6 to 10 mg, were prepared with consistent protein extraction outcome obtained for samples ≥1.2 mg. Combining Ripa and 8 M urea with Bullet Blender increased protein identification to 2126 (81%). Proteins were classified by their cell components, molecular functions, and biological processes. Furthermore, a subclassification of proteins involved in the extracellular matrix (ECM) was introduced. We recommend the use of Ripa buffer, in combination with 8 M urea and Bullet Blender for extracting proteins from fresh-frozen human nerves weighing ≥1.2 mg.</p>","PeriodicalId":22,"journal":{"name":"ACS Omega","volume":"10 5","pages":"5111–5118 5111–5118"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/epdf/10.1021/acsomega.4c11373","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Omega","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsomega.4c11373","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Our aim was to establish an effective method for protein extraction from freshly frozen human peripheral nerves, determine the minimum amount required for consistent protein extraction outcomes, and assess which method produced the highest number of protein identities. Five extraction methods were compared using 8 M urea and Ripa buffer using either the Bullet Blender or Bioruptor. Out of the total 2619 identified proteins, protein extraction using the Ripa buffer combined with either Bioruptor or Bullet Blender resulted in the identification of 1582 (60%) and 1615 (62%) proteins, respectively. In contrast, using 8 M urea and Bioruptor for protein extraction resulted in 1022 proteins (39%), whereas employing Bullet Blender yielded 1446 proteins (55%). Sample amounts, ranging from 0.6 to 10 mg, were prepared with consistent protein extraction outcome obtained for samples ≥1.2 mg. Combining Ripa and 8 M urea with Bullet Blender increased protein identification to 2126 (81%). Proteins were classified by their cell components, molecular functions, and biological processes. Furthermore, a subclassification of proteins involved in the extracellular matrix (ECM) was introduced. We recommend the use of Ripa buffer, in combination with 8 M urea and Bullet Blender for extracting proteins from fresh-frozen human nerves weighing ≥1.2 mg.
ACS OmegaChemical Engineering-General Chemical Engineering
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
4.90%
发文量
3945
审稿时长
2.4 months
期刊介绍:
ACS Omega is an open-access global publication for scientific articles that describe new findings in chemistry and interfacing areas of science, without any perceived evaluation of immediate impact.