Greenspace equity across variation in residential densities: Insights for urban sustainability

IF 6.5 1区 经济学 Q1 DEVELOPMENT STUDIES Habitat International Pub Date : 2025-02-10 DOI:10.1016/j.habitatint.2025.103310
Junjie Wu , Lingzhi Wang , Bryan Pijanowski , Hichem Omrani , Anqi Liang
{"title":"Greenspace equity across variation in residential densities: Insights for urban sustainability","authors":"Junjie Wu ,&nbsp;Lingzhi Wang ,&nbsp;Bryan Pijanowski ,&nbsp;Hichem Omrani ,&nbsp;Anqi Liang","doi":"10.1016/j.habitatint.2025.103310","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The enhancement of eco-social services provided by greenspace enhances human well-being and supports sustainable urban development. The United Nations has explicitly emphasized the need to \"ensure the availability of greenspaces for urban residents\" in SDG11. Nonetheless, with the current trends of urban sprawl and residential densification, greenspace shrinkage and degradation are accelerating, thereby diminishing its multifaceted benefits. These trends have also exacerbated inequalities and environmental justice issues. The disparity in greenspace exposure and its inequality across residential areas with varying densities has also been further exacerbated during this process. However, the specific magnitude and trend of change in this disparity were still poorly understood. To address this gap, we incorporated a random forest algorithm-based 30-m time-series greenspace mapping and an RSEI-based population-weighted exposure framework to quantify spatiotemporal variations in human exposure to greenspace across residential areas of varying densities in 154 cities at the patch scale. Finally, the Gini coefficient and MGWR were combined to assess the spatiotemporal heterogeneity of inequality in greenspace exposure and its influencing factors. Results indicated that greenspace exposure was greater in low-density residential areas than in high-density areas (0.72 vs 0.16), while equality was weaker (Gini coefficient:0.83 vs 0.61), both gaps have shown a tendency to narrow over time. Greenspace exposure equality was primarily driven by greenspace quality rather than its coverage ratio (Beta: −0.434 vs 0.40, P &lt; 0.05). These findings contribute to our understanding of greenspace inequality in residential areas of different densities, suggesting directions for optimizing greenspace layout and offering new insights for sustainable urban development.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48376,"journal":{"name":"Habitat International","volume":"157 ","pages":"Article 103310"},"PeriodicalIF":6.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Habitat International","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0197397525000268","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The enhancement of eco-social services provided by greenspace enhances human well-being and supports sustainable urban development. The United Nations has explicitly emphasized the need to "ensure the availability of greenspaces for urban residents" in SDG11. Nonetheless, with the current trends of urban sprawl and residential densification, greenspace shrinkage and degradation are accelerating, thereby diminishing its multifaceted benefits. These trends have also exacerbated inequalities and environmental justice issues. The disparity in greenspace exposure and its inequality across residential areas with varying densities has also been further exacerbated during this process. However, the specific magnitude and trend of change in this disparity were still poorly understood. To address this gap, we incorporated a random forest algorithm-based 30-m time-series greenspace mapping and an RSEI-based population-weighted exposure framework to quantify spatiotemporal variations in human exposure to greenspace across residential areas of varying densities in 154 cities at the patch scale. Finally, the Gini coefficient and MGWR were combined to assess the spatiotemporal heterogeneity of inequality in greenspace exposure and its influencing factors. Results indicated that greenspace exposure was greater in low-density residential areas than in high-density areas (0.72 vs 0.16), while equality was weaker (Gini coefficient:0.83 vs 0.61), both gaps have shown a tendency to narrow over time. Greenspace exposure equality was primarily driven by greenspace quality rather than its coverage ratio (Beta: −0.434 vs 0.40, P < 0.05). These findings contribute to our understanding of greenspace inequality in residential areas of different densities, suggesting directions for optimizing greenspace layout and offering new insights for sustainable urban development.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.50
自引率
10.30%
发文量
151
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: Habitat International is dedicated to the study of urban and rural human settlements: their planning, design, production and management. Its main focus is on urbanisation in its broadest sense in the developing world. However, increasingly the interrelationships and linkages between cities and towns in the developing and developed worlds are becoming apparent and solutions to the problems that result are urgently required. The economic, social, technological and political systems of the world are intertwined and changes in one region almost always affect other regions.
期刊最新文献
Overregulated and Underserved: Regulatory overlap in infrastructure/service provision in Delhi's ‘informal’ settlements Greenspace equity across variation in residential densities: Insights for urban sustainability How to lead the optimization of parks spatial patterns more comprehensively with the philosophy of green equity: A case of Chengdu Patterns and drivers of population in the borderlands of Mainland Southeast Asia Changing spatial inclusion of migrants in Chinese cities: How housing matters
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1