Marina Vasilyeva, Catalina Rey-Guerra, Linxi Lu, Eric Dearing
{"title":"Parental input as a mediating pathway for gender differences in early academic skills","authors":"Marina Vasilyeva, Catalina Rey-Guerra, Linxi Lu, Eric Dearing","doi":"10.1016/j.ecresq.2025.02.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The persistent gendered pattern in academic achievement, whereby girls outperform boys in language while boys excel in mathematics, is evident as early as primary school. The literature highlights parental input as a key predictor of child development, yet less is known about its role in the context of gender differences in early academic skills. The present study investigated variability in parental input as a function of child gender. Using longitudinal academic scores from a large sample of Russian first-graders (N = 1240, 49.5 % female), as well as their parents' reports on math and language home activities, this study examined parental input as a potential mediator of gender differences in children's language and math skills. Results confirmed the gendered pattern in children's academic skills and revealed that parents were more frequently involved in literacy activities with girls, while the opposite trend was observed for math activities with boys. Additionally, changes in gender differences in children's language and math skills over the period of the study were mediated by language and math parental input, respectively. The discussion explores the implications of these findings for understanding the nature of gender differences and considers potential approaches to addressing these disparities.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48348,"journal":{"name":"Early Childhood Research Quarterly","volume":"72 ","pages":"Pages 35-43"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Early Childhood Research Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0885200625000158","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The persistent gendered pattern in academic achievement, whereby girls outperform boys in language while boys excel in mathematics, is evident as early as primary school. The literature highlights parental input as a key predictor of child development, yet less is known about its role in the context of gender differences in early academic skills. The present study investigated variability in parental input as a function of child gender. Using longitudinal academic scores from a large sample of Russian first-graders (N = 1240, 49.5 % female), as well as their parents' reports on math and language home activities, this study examined parental input as a potential mediator of gender differences in children's language and math skills. Results confirmed the gendered pattern in children's academic skills and revealed that parents were more frequently involved in literacy activities with girls, while the opposite trend was observed for math activities with boys. Additionally, changes in gender differences in children's language and math skills over the period of the study were mediated by language and math parental input, respectively. The discussion explores the implications of these findings for understanding the nature of gender differences and considers potential approaches to addressing these disparities.
期刊介绍:
For over twenty years, Early Childhood Research Quarterly (ECRQ) has influenced the field of early childhood education and development through the publication of empirical research that meets the highest standards of scholarly and practical significance. ECRQ publishes predominantly empirical research (quantitative or qualitative methods) on issues of interest to early childhood development, theory, and educational practice (Birth through 8 years of age). The journal also occasionally publishes practitioner and/or policy perspectives, book reviews, and significant reviews of research. As an applied journal, we are interested in work that has social, policy, and educational relevance and implications and work that strengthens links between research and practice.