Development and validation of an Age-related Language Decline Scale (ALDS) for older adults

IF 2.7 4区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL Acta Psychologica Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-11 DOI:10.1016/j.actpsy.2025.104792
Xinan Zhou, Yanping Dong
{"title":"Development and validation of an Age-related Language Decline Scale (ALDS) for older adults","authors":"Xinan Zhou,&nbsp;Yanping Dong","doi":"10.1016/j.actpsy.2025.104792","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>Language decline in older adults poses a great threat to their independence. A self-report scale designed to measure age-related language decline could be very efficient, but it is still lacking. Thus, the study aimed to develop an Age-related Language Decline Scale (ALDS) for older adults.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Altogether, 287 older adults aged between 65 and 80 years were recruited. They completed a scale consisting of production and comprehension subscales generated from prior research, focus group discussions and expert review. The two subscales were submitted to item analysis, exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis (EFA &amp; CFA), internal consistency and test-retest reliability test. Criterion-related validity was assessed by correlating scale scores with participants' performance in language tasks.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>EFA and CFA results are consistent with the literature which identified memory and inhibition as essential mechanisms of age-related language decline. The internal consistency (for both production and comprehension subscales, Cronbach's α = 0.80) and test-retest reliability (for the full scale, <em>r</em> = 0.80) were well above acceptable levels. The scale also demonstrated satisfactory criterion-related validity, as evidenced by significant correlations between the scale scores and participants' language performance.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The 16-item ALDS is an effective psychometric scale for assessing age-related language decline in older adults.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7141,"journal":{"name":"Acta Psychologica","volume":"254 ","pages":"Article 104792"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Psychologica","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0001691825001052","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

Language decline in older adults poses a great threat to their independence. A self-report scale designed to measure age-related language decline could be very efficient, but it is still lacking. Thus, the study aimed to develop an Age-related Language Decline Scale (ALDS) for older adults.

Methods

Altogether, 287 older adults aged between 65 and 80 years were recruited. They completed a scale consisting of production and comprehension subscales generated from prior research, focus group discussions and expert review. The two subscales were submitted to item analysis, exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis (EFA & CFA), internal consistency and test-retest reliability test. Criterion-related validity was assessed by correlating scale scores with participants' performance in language tasks.

Results

EFA and CFA results are consistent with the literature which identified memory and inhibition as essential mechanisms of age-related language decline. The internal consistency (for both production and comprehension subscales, Cronbach's α = 0.80) and test-retest reliability (for the full scale, r = 0.80) were well above acceptable levels. The scale also demonstrated satisfactory criterion-related validity, as evidenced by significant correlations between the scale scores and participants' language performance.

Conclusions

The 16-item ALDS is an effective psychometric scale for assessing age-related language decline in older adults.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
老年人年龄相关语言衰退量表的开发与验证
目的老年人语言能力的下降对他们的独立性构成了很大的威胁。一种旨在衡量与年龄相关的语言能力下降的自我报告量表可能非常有效,但仍然缺乏。因此,本研究旨在为老年人开发一种与年龄相关的语言衰退量表(ALDS)。方法共招募了287名年龄在65 - 80岁之间的老年人。他们完成了一个由生产和理解子量表组成的量表,该量表由先前的研究、焦点小组讨论和专家评审产生。两个分量表经项目分析、探索性因子分析和验证性因子分析(EFA &;CFA)、内部一致性和重测信度检验。标准相关效度是通过量表得分与参与者在语言任务中的表现相关联来评估的。结果fa和CFA结果与文献一致,认为记忆和抑制是与年龄相关的语言衰退的基本机制。内部一致性(生产和理解分量表,Cronbach's α = 0.80)和重测信度(完整分量表,r = 0.80)均高于可接受水平。量表的效度也令人满意,量表得分与参与者的语言表现之间存在显著的相关性。结论16项aids量表是评估老年人年龄相关性语言能力下降的有效心理测量量表。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Acta Psychologica
Acta Psychologica PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
5.60%
发文量
274
审稿时长
36 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Psychologica publishes original articles and extended reviews on selected books in any area of experimental psychology. The focus of the Journal is on empirical studies and evaluative review articles that increase the theoretical understanding of human capabilities.
期刊最新文献
Qualitative insights into the experiences of French parents of children with developmental coordination disorder (DCD): Child-related challenges and family implications Effects of emotional culture of joy on employee happiness: A moderated-mediation model in hospitality Exploring gender differences in the relations between passion, grit, growth mindset, compassion and success: an explorative study Effects of 8-weeks acupuncture on eyes-closed resting state natural EEG frequency components in endometriosis: AcuENDO trial sub-study Exploring the evolving relationship between children and youth obesity and depression: A bibliometric analysis (1976–2025)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1