Immunotherapy in metastatic renal cell carcinoma: Insights from a Dutch nationwide cohort

IF 4.5 3区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY European Urology Open Science Pub Date : 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1016/j.euros.2025.01.008
Hilin Yildirim , Anke Richters , Adriaan D. Bins , Arnoud W. Postema , Maureen J.B. Aarts , Martijn G.H. van Oijen , Patricia J. Zondervan , Katja K.H. Aben
{"title":"Immunotherapy in metastatic renal cell carcinoma: Insights from a Dutch nationwide cohort","authors":"Hilin Yildirim ,&nbsp;Anke Richters ,&nbsp;Adriaan D. Bins ,&nbsp;Arnoud W. Postema ,&nbsp;Maureen J.B. Aarts ,&nbsp;Martijn G.H. van Oijen ,&nbsp;Patricia J. Zondervan ,&nbsp;Katja K.H. Aben","doi":"10.1016/j.euros.2025.01.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Targeted therapy with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) was the standard of care for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) until recently, when new first-line combinations with immuno-oncology (IO) agents were approved. We evaluated IO uptake in both first-line and later-line treatment in routine clinical practice in the Netherlands. Patients diagnosed with synchronous mRCC between 2018 and 2022 were identified from the population-based Netherlands Cancer Registry (<em>n</em> = 2621). The median age was 70 yr and 58% of patients had clear-cell RCC. Overall, 55% received at least one line of systemic therapy, 7% underwent cytoreductive nephrectomy without systemic therapy, and the remaining 37% received best supportive care. In the systemic treatment cohort, first-line TKI use decreased from 94% in 2018 to 21% in 2022, while IO use increased from 6% to 79%. Data from 2019–2020 show that 32% and 10% of patients received any second-line and third-line therapy, respectively. The 3-yr overall survival rate for patients with synchronous mRCC increased from 20% (95% confidence interval [CI] 16–23%) in 2018 to 28% in 2021 (95% CI 24–33%). Our analysis shows that IO approvals for mRCC since 2019 have led to an immediate and large increase in IO use to approximately 80% of patients who receive systemic treatment.</div></div><div><h3>Patient summary</h3><div>Since 2019, systemic treatments for metastatic kidney cancer have shifted from drugs targeting selected proteins to immunotherapy. Our results show trends over time for more favorable characteristics among patients receiving systemic treatment and improvements in survival.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12254,"journal":{"name":"European Urology Open Science","volume":"72 ","pages":"Pages 42-45"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Urology Open Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666168325000503","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Targeted therapy with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) was the standard of care for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) until recently, when new first-line combinations with immuno-oncology (IO) agents were approved. We evaluated IO uptake in both first-line and later-line treatment in routine clinical practice in the Netherlands. Patients diagnosed with synchronous mRCC between 2018 and 2022 were identified from the population-based Netherlands Cancer Registry (n = 2621). The median age was 70 yr and 58% of patients had clear-cell RCC. Overall, 55% received at least one line of systemic therapy, 7% underwent cytoreductive nephrectomy without systemic therapy, and the remaining 37% received best supportive care. In the systemic treatment cohort, first-line TKI use decreased from 94% in 2018 to 21% in 2022, while IO use increased from 6% to 79%. Data from 2019–2020 show that 32% and 10% of patients received any second-line and third-line therapy, respectively. The 3-yr overall survival rate for patients with synchronous mRCC increased from 20% (95% confidence interval [CI] 16–23%) in 2018 to 28% in 2021 (95% CI 24–33%). Our analysis shows that IO approvals for mRCC since 2019 have led to an immediate and large increase in IO use to approximately 80% of patients who receive systemic treatment.

Patient summary

Since 2019, systemic treatments for metastatic kidney cancer have shifted from drugs targeting selected proteins to immunotherapy. Our results show trends over time for more favorable characteristics among patients receiving systemic treatment and improvements in survival.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
转移性肾细胞癌的免疫治疗:来自荷兰全国队列的见解
酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(TKIs)靶向治疗是转移性肾细胞癌(mRCC)的标准治疗方法,直到最近,新的一线联合免疫肿瘤学(IO)药物被批准。我们在荷兰的常规临床实践中评估了一线和后期治疗中的IO摄取。2018年至2022年间诊断为同步mRCC的患者来自基于人群的荷兰癌症登记处(n = 2621)。中位年龄为70岁,58%的患者为透明细胞肾细胞癌。总体而言,55%的患者接受了至少一条全身性治疗,7%的患者接受了细胞减少性肾切除术而不接受全身性治疗,其余37%的患者接受了最佳支持治疗。在系统性治疗队列中,一线TKI使用率从2018年的94%下降到2022年的21%,而IO使用率从6%上升到79%。2019-2020年的数据显示,分别有32%和10%的患者接受了二线和三线治疗。同步mRCC患者的3年总生存率从2018年的20%(95%置信区间[CI] 16-23%)增加到2021年的28% (95% CI 24-33%)。我们的分析显示,自2019年以来,mRCC的IO批准已导致接受全身治疗的患者中约80%的IO使用量立即大幅增加。自2019年以来,转移性肾癌的全身治疗已经从针对特定蛋白质的药物转向免疫治疗。我们的研究结果显示,随着时间的推移,接受全身治疗的患者有更有利的特征,生存率也有所提高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
European Urology Open Science
European Urology Open Science UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
4.00%
发文量
1183
审稿时长
49 days
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of the Transition from Holmium:YAG to Pulsed Thulium:YAG for Laser Endoscopic Enucleation of the Prostate and the Effect on Procedural Performance Perineural Invasion in Radical Prostatectomy Specimens and Its Association with Biochemical Recurrence and Survival in Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Perioperative Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors Combined with Radical Cystectomy: A Rapid Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Re: Rui M. Bernardino, Leyi B. Yin, Katherine Lajkosz, et al. Intraductal Carcinoma Predicts Poor Response to Neoadjuvant Therapy in High-risk Prostate Cancer: A Retrospective Analysis of a Prospective Trial. Eur Urol Open Sci 2025;82:52–8 Anatomical Variation of the Pudendal Nerve and Related Structures
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1