Evaluation of factors predicting transition from prediabetes to diabetes among patients residing in underserved communities in the United States – A machine learning approach

IF 7 2区 医学 Q1 BIOLOGY Computers in biology and medicine Pub Date : 2025-02-11 DOI:10.1016/j.compbiomed.2025.109824
Arinze Nkemdirim Okere , Tianfeng Li , Carlos Theran , Eunice Nyasani , Askal Ayalew Ali
{"title":"Evaluation of factors predicting transition from prediabetes to diabetes among patients residing in underserved communities in the United States – A machine learning approach","authors":"Arinze Nkemdirim Okere ,&nbsp;Tianfeng Li ,&nbsp;Carlos Theran ,&nbsp;Eunice Nyasani ,&nbsp;Askal Ayalew Ali","doi":"10.1016/j.compbiomed.2025.109824","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Over one-third of the population in the United States (US) has prediabetes. Unfortunately, underserved population in the United States face a higher burden of prediabetes compared to urban areas, increasing the risk of stroke and heart disease. There is a gap in the literature in understanding early predictors of diabetes among patients with prediabetes living in underserved communities in the United States. Hence, this study's objective is to identify factors influencing the transition from prediabetes to diabetes in rural or underserved communities using a machine learning approach.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We conducted a retrospective analysis of data from prediabetic patients between 2012 and 2022. Eligible participants were at least 18 years old with baseline HbA1c levels between 5.7 % and 6.4 %. Eleven machine learning algorithms were evaluated using ten-fold cross-validation, including Logistic Regression (LR), Support Vector Classifier (SVC), K-nearest Neighbor (KNN), Gaussian Naive Bayes (GaussianNB), Bernoulli Naive Bayes (BernoulliNB), Adaptive Boosting (AdaBoost), Decision Tree (DT), Random Forest (RF), Gradient Boosting (GB), Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), and Extra Trees (ET). Subsequently, the SHAP framework was used to assess predictor influence and interactions observed with the top model.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Out of 5816 patients, 1910 met the criteria, with 426 progressing to diabetes. The Random Forest model achieved the highest accuracy (90.0 %) and AUC (0.963), followed by Extra Trees (89.5 % accuracy, AUC 0.962) and XGBoost (88.6 % accuracy, AUC 0.952). Logistic Regression demonstrated lower performance but outperformed other models such as K-Nearest Neighbors and Gaussian Naive Bayes. SHAP analysis with the RF model identified key predictors and their interactions. A significant interaction showed that lower BMI values, combined with increasing age, were associated with a reduced risk of diabetes progression, while higher BMI at younger ages increased the likelihood of progression. Additionally, several social determinants of health were identified as significant predictors.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Among the 11 models, the Random Forest model showed the strongest reliability for predicting diabetes progression. The results of this study can be used to inform public policy implications for the development of early, targeted interventions focusing on social determinants of health, dietary counseling, and BMI management to prevent diabetes in underserved communities.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10578,"journal":{"name":"Computers in biology and medicine","volume":"187 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers in biology and medicine","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S001048252500174X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Over one-third of the population in the United States (US) has prediabetes. Unfortunately, underserved population in the United States face a higher burden of prediabetes compared to urban areas, increasing the risk of stroke and heart disease. There is a gap in the literature in understanding early predictors of diabetes among patients with prediabetes living in underserved communities in the United States. Hence, this study's objective is to identify factors influencing the transition from prediabetes to diabetes in rural or underserved communities using a machine learning approach.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective analysis of data from prediabetic patients between 2012 and 2022. Eligible participants were at least 18 years old with baseline HbA1c levels between 5.7 % and 6.4 %. Eleven machine learning algorithms were evaluated using ten-fold cross-validation, including Logistic Regression (LR), Support Vector Classifier (SVC), K-nearest Neighbor (KNN), Gaussian Naive Bayes (GaussianNB), Bernoulli Naive Bayes (BernoulliNB), Adaptive Boosting (AdaBoost), Decision Tree (DT), Random Forest (RF), Gradient Boosting (GB), Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), and Extra Trees (ET). Subsequently, the SHAP framework was used to assess predictor influence and interactions observed with the top model.

Results

Out of 5816 patients, 1910 met the criteria, with 426 progressing to diabetes. The Random Forest model achieved the highest accuracy (90.0 %) and AUC (0.963), followed by Extra Trees (89.5 % accuracy, AUC 0.962) and XGBoost (88.6 % accuracy, AUC 0.952). Logistic Regression demonstrated lower performance but outperformed other models such as K-Nearest Neighbors and Gaussian Naive Bayes. SHAP analysis with the RF model identified key predictors and their interactions. A significant interaction showed that lower BMI values, combined with increasing age, were associated with a reduced risk of diabetes progression, while higher BMI at younger ages increased the likelihood of progression. Additionally, several social determinants of health were identified as significant predictors.

Conclusion

Among the 11 models, the Random Forest model showed the strongest reliability for predicting diabetes progression. The results of this study can be used to inform public policy implications for the development of early, targeted interventions focusing on social determinants of health, dietary counseling, and BMI management to prevent diabetes in underserved communities.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Computers in biology and medicine
Computers in biology and medicine 工程技术-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
11.70
自引率
10.40%
发文量
1086
审稿时长
74 days
期刊介绍: Computers in Biology and Medicine is an international forum for sharing groundbreaking advancements in the use of computers in bioscience and medicine. This journal serves as a medium for communicating essential research, instruction, ideas, and information regarding the rapidly evolving field of computer applications in these domains. By encouraging the exchange of knowledge, we aim to facilitate progress and innovation in the utilization of computers in biology and medicine.
期刊最新文献
Detection of brain tumors using a transfer learning-based optimized ResNet152 model in MR images PhageDPO: A machine-learning based computational framework for identifying phage depolymerases Active learning and margin strategies for arrhythmia classification in implantable devices Real-time adaptive proton therapy: An AI-based spatio-temporal mono-energetic dose calculation model (CC-LSTM) EAMAPG: Explainable Adversarial Model Analysis via Projected Gradient Descent
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1