Validation of the individual and collective self-efficacy scale for teaching writing in post-secondary faculty

IF 5.5 1区 文学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Assessing Writing Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-10 DOI:10.1016/j.asw.2025.100923
Kim M. Mitchell , Johnson Li , Rasheda Rabbani
{"title":"Validation of the individual and collective self-efficacy scale for teaching writing in post-secondary faculty","authors":"Kim M. Mitchell ,&nbsp;Johnson Li ,&nbsp;Rasheda Rabbani","doi":"10.1016/j.asw.2025.100923","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Faculty actions in the classroom are known to impact student writing self-efficacy and academic achievement. The purpose of this paper was to validate Locke and Johnston’s Individual and Collective Self-Efficacy for Teaching Writing Scales, a tool originally validated in high school teachers, in a new population of post-secondary faculty. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis methods were used in two studies with independent samples of multidisciplinary faculty (N = 281) for the exploratory factor analysis (Study 1) and nursing discipline specific faculty (N = 187) for the confirmatory factor analysis (Study 2). Three factors were identified in the questionnaire which maintained the essence of the theoretical structure proposed by Locke and Johnston. Factor 1 was named Context and Process Competencies, Factor 2 Textural Competencies, and Factor 3 Motivational Competencies. This factor structure was confirmed with acceptable goodness of fit in the confirmatory factor analysis Study 2. Learning to be a teacher of writing is a developmental process and this measurement tool has important validation information that speaks to its usefulness in understanding that process.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":46865,"journal":{"name":"Assessing Writing","volume":"64 ","pages":"Article 100923"},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Assessing Writing","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1075293525000108","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Faculty actions in the classroom are known to impact student writing self-efficacy and academic achievement. The purpose of this paper was to validate Locke and Johnston’s Individual and Collective Self-Efficacy for Teaching Writing Scales, a tool originally validated in high school teachers, in a new population of post-secondary faculty. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis methods were used in two studies with independent samples of multidisciplinary faculty (N = 281) for the exploratory factor analysis (Study 1) and nursing discipline specific faculty (N = 187) for the confirmatory factor analysis (Study 2). Three factors were identified in the questionnaire which maintained the essence of the theoretical structure proposed by Locke and Johnston. Factor 1 was named Context and Process Competencies, Factor 2 Textural Competencies, and Factor 3 Motivational Competencies. This factor structure was confirmed with acceptable goodness of fit in the confirmatory factor analysis Study 2. Learning to be a teacher of writing is a developmental process and this measurement tool has important validation information that speaks to its usefulness in understanding that process.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
大专教师写作教学中个人与集体自我效能感量表的验证
教师在课堂上的行为会影响学生的写作自我效能感和学业成绩。本文的目的是验证洛克和约翰斯顿的教学写作量表的个人和集体自我效能,这是一个最初在高中教师中验证的工具,在新的高等教育教师群体中。研究1采用多学科院系(N = 281)独立样本进行探索性因素分析(研究1),研究2采用护理学科院系(N = 187)独立样本进行验证性因素分析(研究2)。问卷中确定了三个因素,保持了Locke和Johnston提出的理论结构的本质。因子1被命名为语境和过程能力,因子2被命名为结构能力,因子3被命名为动机能力。验证性因子分析研究2证实了该因子结构具有可接受的拟合优度。学习成为一名写作老师是一个发展的过程,这个测量工具有重要的验证信息,说明它在理解这个过程中的有用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Assessing Writing
Assessing Writing Multiple-
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
17.90%
发文量
67
期刊介绍: Assessing Writing is a refereed international journal providing a forum for ideas, research and practice on the assessment of written language. Assessing Writing publishes articles, book reviews, conference reports, and academic exchanges concerning writing assessments of all kinds, including traditional (direct and standardised forms of) testing of writing, alternative performance assessments (such as portfolios), workplace sampling and classroom assessment. The journal focuses on all stages of the writing assessment process, including needs evaluation, assessment creation, implementation, and validation, and test development.
期刊最新文献
Accuracy and fairness of generative AI in automated essay scoring: Comparing GPT-4o, feature-based models, and human raters A multidimensional approach to the impact of achievement emotions on high school students' L2 writing performance Educator perspectives on automated writing scoring and feedback for young language learners: Applying a fairness and justice lens Measuring vocabulary use in L2 English and L2 French writing: How methodological decisions shape the results Aligning ACTFL writing proficiency guidelines with CEFR descriptors: Insights from Chinese writing assessment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1