Charged up with peace in mind: Unraveling the factors of range anxiety among norwegian electric vehicle drivers

IF 4.4 2区 工程技术 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED Transportation Research Part F-Traffic Psychology and Behaviour Pub Date : 2025-02-10 DOI:10.1016/j.trf.2025.02.006
Junianna Zatsarnaja , Katharina Reiter , Milad Mehdizadeh , Alim Nayum , Trond Nordfjærn
{"title":"Charged up with peace in mind: Unraveling the factors of range anxiety among norwegian electric vehicle drivers","authors":"Junianna Zatsarnaja ,&nbsp;Katharina Reiter ,&nbsp;Milad Mehdizadeh ,&nbsp;Alim Nayum ,&nbsp;Trond Nordfjærn","doi":"10.1016/j.trf.2025.02.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Range anxiety and its associated factors are crucial for designing effective solutions to enhance the Electric Vehicle (EV) user experience. The present study is based on a survey of 1,005 EV drivers in Norway. It aims to provide insights into the perception of range anxiety in a country with well-developed electric mobility. We contribute to the state-of-the-art by exploring the concept of range anxiety based on eleven potential explanatory variables describing EV adopters’ driving experience, charging-related user experience, psychological characteristics, and socio-demographics. Our analysis showed that the longer the EV driving experience, the greater the perceived ease of charging and charging flexibility, the lower the range anxiety will be. Further, stronger control beliefs over EV’s charging state and willingness to take risks relate to lower range anxiety. Additionally, being younger and being female are associated with lower range anxiety among EV drivers. However, perceived helpfulness of charging guidance, technology openness, and settlement size of EV drivers are not significantly associated with range anxiety. Our study highlights the importance of providing situation- and user-oriented charging information, a smooth and easy-to-understand charging process, and the need to support EV drivers who are less experienced, older, and routine-based.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48355,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Research Part F-Traffic Psychology and Behaviour","volume":"110 ","pages":"Pages 15-28"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Research Part F-Traffic Psychology and Behaviour","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1369847825000531","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Range anxiety and its associated factors are crucial for designing effective solutions to enhance the Electric Vehicle (EV) user experience. The present study is based on a survey of 1,005 EV drivers in Norway. It aims to provide insights into the perception of range anxiety in a country with well-developed electric mobility. We contribute to the state-of-the-art by exploring the concept of range anxiety based on eleven potential explanatory variables describing EV adopters’ driving experience, charging-related user experience, psychological characteristics, and socio-demographics. Our analysis showed that the longer the EV driving experience, the greater the perceived ease of charging and charging flexibility, the lower the range anxiety will be. Further, stronger control beliefs over EV’s charging state and willingness to take risks relate to lower range anxiety. Additionally, being younger and being female are associated with lower range anxiety among EV drivers. However, perceived helpfulness of charging guidance, technology openness, and settlement size of EV drivers are not significantly associated with range anxiety. Our study highlights the importance of providing situation- and user-oriented charging information, a smooth and easy-to-understand charging process, and the need to support EV drivers who are less experienced, older, and routine-based.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
充电时心安理得:揭示挪威电动汽车司机里程焦虑的因素
里程焦虑及其相关因素对于设计有效的解决方案以提高电动汽车(EV)用户体验至关重要。目前的研究是基于对挪威1005名电动汽车司机的调查。它旨在深入了解一个电动交通发达的国家对里程焦虑的看法。我们基于11个潜在的解释变量来探索里程焦虑的概念,这些变量描述了电动汽车使用者的驾驶体验、充电相关的用户体验、心理特征和社会人口统计学。我们的分析表明,电动汽车行驶时间越长,充电的易用性和充电的灵活性越高,里程焦虑越低。此外,对电动汽车充电状态更强的控制信念和承担风险的意愿与较低的里程焦虑有关。此外,在电动汽车司机中,年轻和女性与较低的里程焦虑有关。然而,充电指导的感知帮助性、技术开放性和电动汽车司机的结算规模与里程焦虑不显著相关。我们的研究强调了提供以情况和用户为导向的充电信息的重要性,一个平稳且易于理解的充电过程,以及为经验不足、年龄较大、习惯驾驶的电动汽车司机提供支持的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
14.60%
发文量
239
审稿时长
71 days
期刊介绍: Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour focuses on the behavioural and psychological aspects of traffic and transport. The aim of the journal is to enhance theory development, improve the quality of empirical studies and to stimulate the application of research findings in practice. TRF provides a focus and a means of communication for the considerable amount of research activities that are now being carried out in this field. The journal provides a forum for transportation researchers, psychologists, ergonomists, engineers and policy-makers with an interest in traffic and transport psychology.
期刊最新文献
Investigating risky riding behaviors among young motorcyclists in Bangladesh using a modified motorcycle rider behavior questionnaire Whose safety should come first in case of an unavoidable crash involving a driverless passenger vehicle? a nationwide snapshot of public perceptions and expectations Understanding driver visual distraction and its relationship with speeding: Insights from naturalistic driving data Impact analysis of commuting on multidimensional well-being: The mediation effects of social network and travel satisfaction Scales and inventories in traffic psychology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1