Chatbots in education: Hype or help? A meta-analysis

IF 3.8 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL Learning and Individual Differences Pub Date : 2025-02-11 DOI:10.1016/j.lindif.2025.102646
Martin Laun, Fabian Wolff
{"title":"Chatbots in education: Hype or help? A meta-analysis","authors":"Martin Laun,&nbsp;Fabian Wolff","doi":"10.1016/j.lindif.2025.102646","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Artificial intelligence integration in education, primarily through chatbots, has emerged as a potential solution to address the challenges of catering to students' diverse learning backgrounds. This meta-analysis examined chatbot effectiveness in education, driven by amplified interest since ChatGPT's introduction in 2022. Adhering to PRISMA guidelines, we analyzed 135 effect sizes from 62 studies across diverse educational contexts. Initial results revealed a large positive effect of chatbots on learning performance. However, after controlling for publication bias, we found a significant small to moderate effect. Interaction mode, field of study, intervention duration, and educational level emerged as significant moderators. Text-based interactions, STEM disciplines, longer interventions, and lower educational levels showed the most substantial chatbot effectiveness in enhancing learning performance. Neither chatbot type nor cultural differences significantly influenced learning performance. While our findings support chatbots' potential to enhance performance, they underscore the necessity for targeted implementation when integrating these technologies into learning environments.</div></div><div><h3>Educational relevance statement</h3><div>Our meta-analysis reveals that chatbots have a small to moderate statistically significant positive effect on student learning performance. While chatbots show promise in enhancing education, particularly in STEM fields, text-based interactions, and for longer-term interventions, their impact may be overestimated due to publication bias. These findings underscore the need for targeted chatbot integration in education. Further research is essential as AI continues to evolve to maximize chatbots' educational benefits.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48336,"journal":{"name":"Learning and Individual Differences","volume":"119 ","pages":"Article 102646"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Learning and Individual Differences","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1041608025000226","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Artificial intelligence integration in education, primarily through chatbots, has emerged as a potential solution to address the challenges of catering to students' diverse learning backgrounds. This meta-analysis examined chatbot effectiveness in education, driven by amplified interest since ChatGPT's introduction in 2022. Adhering to PRISMA guidelines, we analyzed 135 effect sizes from 62 studies across diverse educational contexts. Initial results revealed a large positive effect of chatbots on learning performance. However, after controlling for publication bias, we found a significant small to moderate effect. Interaction mode, field of study, intervention duration, and educational level emerged as significant moderators. Text-based interactions, STEM disciplines, longer interventions, and lower educational levels showed the most substantial chatbot effectiveness in enhancing learning performance. Neither chatbot type nor cultural differences significantly influenced learning performance. While our findings support chatbots' potential to enhance performance, they underscore the necessity for targeted implementation when integrating these technologies into learning environments.

Educational relevance statement

Our meta-analysis reveals that chatbots have a small to moderate statistically significant positive effect on student learning performance. While chatbots show promise in enhancing education, particularly in STEM fields, text-based interactions, and for longer-term interventions, their impact may be overestimated due to publication bias. These findings underscore the need for targeted chatbot integration in education. Further research is essential as AI continues to evolve to maximize chatbots' educational benefits.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Learning and Individual Differences
Learning and Individual Differences PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL-
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
2.80%
发文量
86
期刊介绍: Learning and Individual Differences is a research journal devoted to publishing articles of individual differences as they relate to learning within an educational context. The Journal focuses on original empirical studies of high theoretical and methodological rigor that that make a substantial scientific contribution. Learning and Individual Differences publishes original research. Manuscripts should be no longer than 7500 words of primary text (not including tables, figures, references).
期刊最新文献
Learning as retention; an examination of retention of self-derived knowledge through memory integration in a diverse sample of elementary students Exploring the emotion-motivation nexus in English-medium higher education: A longitudinal mixed-methods study Chatbots in education: Hype or help? A meta-analysis The influence of competitive and cooperative classroom climate on middle school students' academic help seeking A piece of the puzzle to understand the association between instructional support and student engagement
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1