Mark Goodhew, Sonia Matiuk, Carmen Axisa, Chris Gough, Jo River
{"title":"Transforming Alcohol and Other Drug Education Through Co-Design","authors":"Mark Goodhew, Sonia Matiuk, Carmen Axisa, Chris Gough, Jo River","doi":"10.1111/inm.70009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Over the past decade, as a broader push to address community needs and improve health outcomes, socially marginalised people have become increasingly involved in co-design research and education. More recently, people with lived experience of substance dependence have co-designed and co-delivered Alcohol and Other Drugs (AOD) education with nurse educators. Evaluations of co-designed AOD education have largely focused on educational and clinical outcomes but not on the process of co-design. Because of this gap, there is a need for research that explores the process of undertaking co-design with people who use substances and clinicians, including facilitators and barriers to the process that are specific to these groups. This research reports on a qualitative study exploring the barriers, facilitators, and perceived value of a co-design process for an AOD clinical education program involving people with lived experience of substance use, nurse clinicians, and academics (nursing and public health). The participants reported that building trusting relationships and skilled facilitation enhanced the co-design process, enabling positive conditions for working in partnership to achieve the project outcomes. However, challenging interpersonal dynamics, lack of adequate resources, and overly directive facilitation could impact team dynamics and undermine the co-design process. Authentic co-design has the potential to transform AOD education, ensuring that it centres the needs of people with lived experience. However, co-design initiatives require adequate resourcing and time to develop equal and respectful relationships for this vision to be realised.</p>","PeriodicalId":14007,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Mental Health Nursing","volume":"34 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/inm.70009","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Mental Health Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/inm.70009","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Over the past decade, as a broader push to address community needs and improve health outcomes, socially marginalised people have become increasingly involved in co-design research and education. More recently, people with lived experience of substance dependence have co-designed and co-delivered Alcohol and Other Drugs (AOD) education with nurse educators. Evaluations of co-designed AOD education have largely focused on educational and clinical outcomes but not on the process of co-design. Because of this gap, there is a need for research that explores the process of undertaking co-design with people who use substances and clinicians, including facilitators and barriers to the process that are specific to these groups. This research reports on a qualitative study exploring the barriers, facilitators, and perceived value of a co-design process for an AOD clinical education program involving people with lived experience of substance use, nurse clinicians, and academics (nursing and public health). The participants reported that building trusting relationships and skilled facilitation enhanced the co-design process, enabling positive conditions for working in partnership to achieve the project outcomes. However, challenging interpersonal dynamics, lack of adequate resources, and overly directive facilitation could impact team dynamics and undermine the co-design process. Authentic co-design has the potential to transform AOD education, ensuring that it centres the needs of people with lived experience. However, co-design initiatives require adequate resourcing and time to develop equal and respectful relationships for this vision to be realised.
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of Mental Health Nursing is the official journal of the Australian College of Mental Health Nurses Inc. It is a fully refereed journal that examines current trends and developments in mental health practice and research.
The International Journal of Mental Health Nursing provides a forum for the exchange of ideas on all issues of relevance to mental health nursing. The Journal informs you of developments in mental health nursing practice and research, directions in education and training, professional issues, management approaches, policy development, ethical questions, theoretical inquiry, and clinical issues.
The Journal publishes feature articles, review articles, clinical notes, research notes and book reviews. Contributions on any aspect of mental health nursing are welcomed.
Statements and opinions expressed in the journal reflect the views of the authors and are not necessarily endorsed by the Australian College of Mental Health Nurses Inc.