Assessment of On-Farm Saved Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) Seed Quality in Central Ethiopia

Q1 Agricultural and Biological Sciences Legume Science Pub Date : 2025-02-10 DOI:10.1002/leg3.70020
Abebe Sori, Zewdie Bishaw, Asnake Fikre, Mashilla Dejene, Karta Kaske
{"title":"Assessment of On-Farm Saved Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) Seed Quality in Central Ethiopia","authors":"Abebe Sori,&nbsp;Zewdie Bishaw,&nbsp;Asnake Fikre,&nbsp;Mashilla Dejene,&nbsp;Karta Kaske","doi":"10.1002/leg3.70020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Limited information exists on the impact of current seed storage methods on seed quality in Central Ethiopia. The study aimed to assess the extent of the decline in seed quality of on-farm stored chickpeas. Two hundred two farmers were identified using a multistage and purposive technique, and seed samples were collected from five districts. Two rounds of on-farm seed samples were collected at early storage in March and at planting time in September 2022. Seed quality tests, including physical purity, physiological quality, and seed health were conducted using standard laboratory techniques for the seed samples. In Round 1, the results showed that mean physical purity, seed moisture (SM, %), and seed germination (SG, %) were 94.9%, 10.7%, and 83.8%, respectively. Moreover, about 95.5% and 81.8% of the seed samples satisfied the certified seed class D standards for SM and SG, respectively. However, for Round 2, the samples met the certified seed class D standard for SM and standard SG dropped to 36.9% and 63.1%, respectively. In Round 1, seed infection varied between 12% and 80%, whereas in Round 2, seed infection varied between 25% and 100%. During both rounds of seed sampling, no seed sample fulfilled the standard for certified seed class D specified for chickpea seed infection (%). Overall, seed quality was considerably lower during planting time compared to early storage. The study showed challenges in maintaining seed quality using current seed production, seed storage, and management practices indicating a need to improve seed production, processing, and handling practices to enhance farm-level chickpea seed quality and productivity.</p>","PeriodicalId":17929,"journal":{"name":"Legume Science","volume":"7 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/leg3.70020","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Legume Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/leg3.70020","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Limited information exists on the impact of current seed storage methods on seed quality in Central Ethiopia. The study aimed to assess the extent of the decline in seed quality of on-farm stored chickpeas. Two hundred two farmers were identified using a multistage and purposive technique, and seed samples were collected from five districts. Two rounds of on-farm seed samples were collected at early storage in March and at planting time in September 2022. Seed quality tests, including physical purity, physiological quality, and seed health were conducted using standard laboratory techniques for the seed samples. In Round 1, the results showed that mean physical purity, seed moisture (SM, %), and seed germination (SG, %) were 94.9%, 10.7%, and 83.8%, respectively. Moreover, about 95.5% and 81.8% of the seed samples satisfied the certified seed class D standards for SM and SG, respectively. However, for Round 2, the samples met the certified seed class D standard for SM and standard SG dropped to 36.9% and 63.1%, respectively. In Round 1, seed infection varied between 12% and 80%, whereas in Round 2, seed infection varied between 25% and 100%. During both rounds of seed sampling, no seed sample fulfilled the standard for certified seed class D specified for chickpea seed infection (%). Overall, seed quality was considerably lower during planting time compared to early storage. The study showed challenges in maintaining seed quality using current seed production, seed storage, and management practices indicating a need to improve seed production, processing, and handling practices to enhance farm-level chickpea seed quality and productivity.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Legume Science
Legume Science Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Plant Science
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
32
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊最新文献
Impact of Radiofrequency and Microwave Heating on the Nutritional and Antinutritional Properties of Pulses: A Review Detection and Partial Characterization of Polerovirus and Luteovirus Isolates Associated With Lentil and Chickpea in Ethiopia Impact of Drying Methods and pH-Shift + US Modification of Mung Bean Protein on the Stability of Pickering Emulsion Assessment of On-Farm Saved Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) Seed Quality in Central Ethiopia Evaluation of Mean Performance and Stability of Lentil Genotypes According to Combination of Additive Main Effects and Multiplicative Interaction, and Best Linear Unbiased Prediction Methods
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1