Barriers and Facilitators of Implementing Arabic-Validated Standardised Outcome Measures for Chronic Stroke Rehabilitation Among Physical Therapists

IF 2.1 4区医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Journal of evaluation in clinical practice Pub Date : 2025-02-10 DOI:10.1111/jep.70018

Maha Almarwani, Reham Alhamyani

{"title":"Barriers and Facilitators of Implementing Arabic-Validated Standardised Outcome Measures for Chronic Stroke Rehabilitation Among Physical Therapists","authors":"Maha Almarwani, Reham Alhamyani","doi":"10.1111/jep.70018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Implementing standardised outcome measures (SOMs) in stroke rehabilitation practices enhances patient care, communication, and overall clinical effectiveness. However, the implementation of Arabic-validated SOMs in stroke rehabilitation practices among Arabic-speaking patients has not been fully explored.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aims</h3>\n \n <p>To examine the use, facilitators, and barriers of implementing Arabic-validated SOMs for chronic stroke rehabilitation among physical therapists.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A cross-sectional survey was conducted among 262 physical therapists managing patients with chronic stroke. The survey evaluated the use, facilitators, and barriers to implementing Arabic-validated SOMs. Descriptive statistics summarised demographic and professional characteristics, while multivariate logistic regression identified independent predictors of SOM use, with adjusted odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals calculated.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The use of Arabic-validated SOMs in chronic stroke rehabilitation was reported by 54% of therapists within the first week of physical therapy services and 64% at discharge. The Berg Balance Scale and the Timed Up and Go test were the two most commonly employed scales. Facilitators for implementing SOMs included facilitating adherence to clinical practice guidelines, providing valuable patient insights, and supporting balanced assessments. Barriers included time constraints, financial limitations, and time demands on both patients and therapists. Familiarity with clinical practice guidelines was significantly associated with increased use of Arabic-validated SOMs.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Implementing Arabic-validated SOMs is essential to ensure culturally appropriate and linguistically accurate evaluations that support evidence-based decision-making and enhance patient management in stroke rehabilitation among Arabic-speaking patients. Enhancing familiarity with clinical practice guidelines and addressing barriers such as time constraints and financial challenges can further promote the implementation of Arabic-validated SOMs into routine practice, ultimately improving patient outcomes.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":15997,"journal":{"name":"Journal of evaluation in clinical practice","volume":"31 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of evaluation in clinical practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jep.70018","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Implementing standardised outcome measures (SOMs) in stroke rehabilitation practices enhances patient care, communication, and overall clinical effectiveness. However, the implementation of Arabic-validated SOMs in stroke rehabilitation practices among Arabic-speaking patients has not been fully explored.

Aims

To examine the use, facilitators, and barriers of implementing Arabic-validated SOMs for chronic stroke rehabilitation among physical therapists.

Methods

A cross-sectional survey was conducted among 262 physical therapists managing patients with chronic stroke. The survey evaluated the use, facilitators, and barriers to implementing Arabic-validated SOMs. Descriptive statistics summarised demographic and professional characteristics, while multivariate logistic regression identified independent predictors of SOM use, with adjusted odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals calculated.

Results

The use of Arabic-validated SOMs in chronic stroke rehabilitation was reported by 54% of therapists within the first week of physical therapy services and 64% at discharge. The Berg Balance Scale and the Timed Up and Go test were the two most commonly employed scales. Facilitators for implementing SOMs included facilitating adherence to clinical practice guidelines, providing valuable patient insights, and supporting balanced assessments. Barriers included time constraints, financial limitations, and time demands on both patients and therapists. Familiarity with clinical practice guidelines was significantly associated with increased use of Arabic-validated SOMs.

Conclusions

Implementing Arabic-validated SOMs is essential to ensure culturally appropriate and linguistically accurate evaluations that support evidence-based decision-making and enhance patient management in stroke rehabilitation among Arabic-speaking patients. Enhancing familiarity with clinical practice guidelines and addressing barriers such as time constraints and financial challenges can further promote the implementation of Arabic-validated SOMs into routine practice, ultimately improving patient outcomes.

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文去求助

来源期刊

Journal of evaluation in clinical practice 医学-卫生保健

CiteScore

4.80

自引率

4.20%

发文量

143

审稿时长

3-8 weeks

期刊介绍： The Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice aims to promote the evaluation and development of clinical practice across medicine, nursing and the allied health professions. All aspects of health services research and public health policy analysis and debate are of interest to the Journal whether studied from a population-based or individual patient-centred perspective. Of particular interest to the Journal are submissions on all aspects of clinical effectiveness and efficiency including evidence-based medicine, clinical practice guidelines, clinical decision making, clinical services organisation, implementation and delivery, health economic evaluation, health process and outcome measurement and new or improved methods (conceptual and statistical) for systematic inquiry into clinical practice. Papers may take a classical quantitative or qualitative approach to investigation (or may utilise both techniques) or may take the form of learned essays, structured/systematic reviews and critiques.