Expert Opinions on an Optimal Infant Feeding Quantitative Data Framework: A Mixed Methods Delphi-Style Study in the UK

IF 2.9 3区医学 Q3 NUTRITION & DIETETICS Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics Pub Date : 2025-02-10 DOI:10.1111/jhn.70025

Rochelle Embling, Rachel Evans, Niamh Mchugh, Anna Kolosowska, Varsha Nagaraj, Rachel Bath

{"title":"Expert Opinions on an Optimal Infant Feeding Quantitative Data Framework: A Mixed Methods Delphi-Style Study in the UK","authors":"Rochelle Embling, Rachel Evans, Niamh Mchugh, Anna Kolosowska, Varsha Nagaraj, Rachel Bath","doi":"10.1111/jhn.70025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>This study aimed to explore how expert stakeholders involved in research, policy and practice would define an ideal dataset for collecting infant feeding data, to better align efforts to monitor and evaluate breastfeeding across the UK four nations.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methodology</h3>\n \n <p>Using the Delphi method, two phases of consultation were completed with a total of 42 stakeholders. First, qualitative (Round 1) and quantitative (Round 2) surveys were distributed to an interdisciplinary panel of experts, to identify individual-level agreement for key terms and timepoints for data collection relevant to infant age. Second, policy-led stakeholders discussed outcomes from Phase 1, before contributing to a written consultation response for their nation to indicate group-level agreement.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Across Phase 1 surveys, 13 of 15 indicators reached consensus for definitions, and 11 of 13 reached consensus for timepoints. During Phase 2, 5 of 7 indicators reached a level of final agreement. Data collection was suggested to focus on the intention to breastfeed (around birth), and the early initiation of feeding (from birth to 10 days). Monitoring of ‘exclusive’ breastfeeding from 0 to 6 months, ‘any’ breastfeeding from 0 to 24 months, and complementary feeding at 6 and 12 months, were identified as key touchpoints.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Principal Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>To support the feasibility of data reforms across UK nations, these results identify consensus for a shortlist of shared data indicators (see Supplementary Figure 1), highlighting opportunities for data collection that close the gap with international standards, and align with existing monitoring frameworks and healthcare practice.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":54803,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics","volume":"38 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jhn.70025","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

This study aimed to explore how expert stakeholders involved in research, policy and practice would define an ideal dataset for collecting infant feeding data, to better align efforts to monitor and evaluate breastfeeding across the UK four nations.

Methodology

Using the Delphi method, two phases of consultation were completed with a total of 42 stakeholders. First, qualitative (Round 1) and quantitative (Round 2) surveys were distributed to an interdisciplinary panel of experts, to identify individual-level agreement for key terms and timepoints for data collection relevant to infant age. Second, policy-led stakeholders discussed outcomes from Phase 1, before contributing to a written consultation response for their nation to indicate group-level agreement.

Results

Across Phase 1 surveys, 13 of 15 indicators reached consensus for definitions, and 11 of 13 reached consensus for timepoints. During Phase 2, 5 of 7 indicators reached a level of final agreement. Data collection was suggested to focus on the intention to breastfeed (around birth), and the early initiation of feeding (from birth to 10 days). Monitoring of ‘exclusive’ breastfeeding from 0 to 6 months, ‘any’ breastfeeding from 0 to 24 months, and complementary feeding at 6 and 12 months, were identified as key touchpoints.

Principal Conclusions

To support the feasibility of data reforms across UK nations, these results identify consensus for a shortlist of shared data indicators (see Supplementary Figure 1), highlighting opportunities for data collection that close the gap with international standards, and align with existing monitoring frameworks and healthcare practice.

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文去求助

来源期刊

Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics 医学-营养学

CiteScore

5.30

自引率

15.20%

发文量

133

审稿时长

6-12 weeks

期刊介绍： Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics is an international peer-reviewed journal publishing papers in applied nutrition and dietetics. Papers are therefore welcomed on: - Clinical nutrition and the practice of therapeutic dietetics - Clinical and professional guidelines - Public health nutrition and nutritional epidemiology - Dietary surveys and dietary assessment methodology - Health promotion and intervention studies and their effectiveness - Obesity, weight control and body composition - Research on psychological determinants of healthy and unhealthy eating behaviour. Focus can for example be on attitudes, brain correlates of food reward processing, social influences, impulsivity, cognitive control, cognitive processes, dieting, psychological treatments. - Appetite, Food intake and nutritional status - Nutrigenomics and molecular nutrition - The journal does not publish animal research The journal is published in an online-only format. No printed issue of this title will be produced but authors will still be able to order offprints of their own articles.