A Clustering-Based Loading History Selection Method for the Calibration of Buckling-Restrained Braces in Seismic Analysis

IF 4.3 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, CIVIL Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics Pub Date : 2024-12-12 DOI:10.1002/eqe.4291
Hongzhou Zhang, Oh-Sung Kwon, Constantin Christopoulos
{"title":"A Clustering-Based Loading History Selection Method for the Calibration of Buckling-Restrained Braces in Seismic Analysis","authors":"Hongzhou Zhang,&nbsp;Oh-Sung Kwon,&nbsp;Constantin Christopoulos","doi":"10.1002/eqe.4291","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The accuracy of engineering demand parameters obtained from nonlinear time-history analysis (NTHA) is crucial in a performance-based earthquake engineering framework. Hysteretic models are commonly used for predicting the nonlinear response of critical structural components and are essential for ensuring the accuracy of NTHA results. Hysteretic models are typically calibrated based on the experimental data from a quasi-static test utilizing a standardized reversed-cyclic loading protocol. Recent studies, however, have shown that this conventional model calibration method may lead to inaccurate dynamic response of a structural system because the standardized reversed-cyclic loading history (LH) is unrealistic compared to what the component would experience in a structural system subjected to earthquake ground motions. These studies have demonstrated the benefits of using more realistic LHs for hysteretic model calibration by evaluating the calibration relevance (CR) of different calibration methods. The objective of this study is to extend the framework of evaluating calibration methods and to provide additional insights and recommendations to enhance the robustness of model calibrations. This is achieved by analyses conducted on a suite of buckling-restrained braced frames (BRBFs). First, a comprehensive global sensitivity analysis (GSA) of parameters for a commonly used hysteretic model is conducted based on a probabilistic input model that was derived previously from multiple hybrid simulations. The GSA is conducted by evaluating Sobol’ indices using a metamodel-based approach with polynomial chaos expansions (PCEs). Next, 20 features are extracted from each realistic LH considering the characteristics in the transitional and plastic ranges of the corresponding hysteresis curve. A clustering-based LH selection criterion based on these features is then proposed to identify an optimal cluster of LHs exhibiting greater CR values, which are desirable in achieving higher accuracy in the global model of the structural system.</p>","PeriodicalId":11390,"journal":{"name":"Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics","volume":"54 3","pages":"905-924"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/eqe.4291","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/eqe.4291","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The accuracy of engineering demand parameters obtained from nonlinear time-history analysis (NTHA) is crucial in a performance-based earthquake engineering framework. Hysteretic models are commonly used for predicting the nonlinear response of critical structural components and are essential for ensuring the accuracy of NTHA results. Hysteretic models are typically calibrated based on the experimental data from a quasi-static test utilizing a standardized reversed-cyclic loading protocol. Recent studies, however, have shown that this conventional model calibration method may lead to inaccurate dynamic response of a structural system because the standardized reversed-cyclic loading history (LH) is unrealistic compared to what the component would experience in a structural system subjected to earthquake ground motions. These studies have demonstrated the benefits of using more realistic LHs for hysteretic model calibration by evaluating the calibration relevance (CR) of different calibration methods. The objective of this study is to extend the framework of evaluating calibration methods and to provide additional insights and recommendations to enhance the robustness of model calibrations. This is achieved by analyses conducted on a suite of buckling-restrained braced frames (BRBFs). First, a comprehensive global sensitivity analysis (GSA) of parameters for a commonly used hysteretic model is conducted based on a probabilistic input model that was derived previously from multiple hybrid simulations. The GSA is conducted by evaluating Sobol’ indices using a metamodel-based approach with polynomial chaos expansions (PCEs). Next, 20 features are extracted from each realistic LH considering the characteristics in the transitional and plastic ranges of the corresponding hysteresis curve. A clustering-based LH selection criterion based on these features is then proposed to identify an optimal cluster of LHs exhibiting greater CR values, which are desirable in achieving higher accuracy in the global model of the structural system.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics
Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 工程技术-工程:地质
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
13.30%
发文量
180
审稿时长
4.8 months
期刊介绍: Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics provides a forum for the publication of papers on several aspects of engineering related to earthquakes. The problems in this field, and their solutions, are international in character and require knowledge of several traditional disciplines; the Journal will reflect this. Papers that may be relevant but do not emphasize earthquake engineering and related structural dynamics are not suitable for the Journal. Relevant topics include the following: ground motions for analysis and design geotechnical earthquake engineering probabilistic and deterministic methods of dynamic analysis experimental behaviour of structures seismic protective systems system identification risk assessment seismic code requirements methods for earthquake-resistant design and retrofit of structures.
期刊最新文献
Issue information Issue information Modeling and Response of a Three-Story Steel Building With Sliding Slabs in Earthquake Motions Full-Scale Tests to Characterize the Effect of Framing Action and Slab Continuity on the Collapse Capacity of Composite Frames Under Cyclic Loading Rocking Spectrum for Cylindrical Structures Subjected to Bidirectional Pulse-Like Ground Motions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1