A Clustering-Based Loading History Selection Method for the Calibration of Buckling-Restrained Braces in Seismic Analysis

IF 5 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, CIVIL Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics Pub Date : 2024-12-12 DOI:10.1002/eqe.4291
Hongzhou Zhang, Oh-Sung Kwon, Constantin Christopoulos
{"title":"A Clustering-Based Loading History Selection Method for the Calibration of Buckling-Restrained Braces in Seismic Analysis","authors":"Hongzhou Zhang,&nbsp;Oh-Sung Kwon,&nbsp;Constantin Christopoulos","doi":"10.1002/eqe.4291","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The accuracy of engineering demand parameters obtained from nonlinear time-history analysis (NTHA) is crucial in a performance-based earthquake engineering framework. Hysteretic models are commonly used for predicting the nonlinear response of critical structural components and are essential for ensuring the accuracy of NTHA results. Hysteretic models are typically calibrated based on the experimental data from a quasi-static test utilizing a standardized reversed-cyclic loading protocol. Recent studies, however, have shown that this conventional model calibration method may lead to inaccurate dynamic response of a structural system because the standardized reversed-cyclic loading history (LH) is unrealistic compared to what the component would experience in a structural system subjected to earthquake ground motions. These studies have demonstrated the benefits of using more realistic LHs for hysteretic model calibration by evaluating the calibration relevance (CR) of different calibration methods. The objective of this study is to extend the framework of evaluating calibration methods and to provide additional insights and recommendations to enhance the robustness of model calibrations. This is achieved by analyses conducted on a suite of buckling-restrained braced frames (BRBFs). First, a comprehensive global sensitivity analysis (GSA) of parameters for a commonly used hysteretic model is conducted based on a probabilistic input model that was derived previously from multiple hybrid simulations. The GSA is conducted by evaluating Sobol’ indices using a metamodel-based approach with polynomial chaos expansions (PCEs). Next, 20 features are extracted from each realistic LH considering the characteristics in the transitional and plastic ranges of the corresponding hysteresis curve. A clustering-based LH selection criterion based on these features is then proposed to identify an optimal cluster of LHs exhibiting greater CR values, which are desirable in achieving higher accuracy in the global model of the structural system.</p>","PeriodicalId":11390,"journal":{"name":"Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics","volume":"54 3","pages":"905-924"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/eqe.4291","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/eqe.4291","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The accuracy of engineering demand parameters obtained from nonlinear time-history analysis (NTHA) is crucial in a performance-based earthquake engineering framework. Hysteretic models are commonly used for predicting the nonlinear response of critical structural components and are essential for ensuring the accuracy of NTHA results. Hysteretic models are typically calibrated based on the experimental data from a quasi-static test utilizing a standardized reversed-cyclic loading protocol. Recent studies, however, have shown that this conventional model calibration method may lead to inaccurate dynamic response of a structural system because the standardized reversed-cyclic loading history (LH) is unrealistic compared to what the component would experience in a structural system subjected to earthquake ground motions. These studies have demonstrated the benefits of using more realistic LHs for hysteretic model calibration by evaluating the calibration relevance (CR) of different calibration methods. The objective of this study is to extend the framework of evaluating calibration methods and to provide additional insights and recommendations to enhance the robustness of model calibrations. This is achieved by analyses conducted on a suite of buckling-restrained braced frames (BRBFs). First, a comprehensive global sensitivity analysis (GSA) of parameters for a commonly used hysteretic model is conducted based on a probabilistic input model that was derived previously from multiple hybrid simulations. The GSA is conducted by evaluating Sobol’ indices using a metamodel-based approach with polynomial chaos expansions (PCEs). Next, 20 features are extracted from each realistic LH considering the characteristics in the transitional and plastic ranges of the corresponding hysteresis curve. A clustering-based LH selection criterion based on these features is then proposed to identify an optimal cluster of LHs exhibiting greater CR values, which are desirable in achieving higher accuracy in the global model of the structural system.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
地震分析中屈曲约束支撑标定的聚类加载历史选择方法
在基于性能的地震工程框架中,非线性时程分析获得的工程需求参数的准确性至关重要。滞回模型通常用于预测关键结构部件的非线性响应,对于确保NTHA结果的准确性至关重要。滞回模型通常基于准静态测试的实验数据,利用标准化的反循环加载协议进行校准。然而,最近的研究表明,这种传统的模型校准方法可能导致结构系统的动力响应不准确,因为标准化的反循环加载历史(LH)与结构系统中构件在地震地面运动下的经历相比是不现实的。这些研究通过评估不同校准方法的校准相关性(CR),证明了使用更现实的LHs进行滞后模型校准的好处。本研究的目的是扩展评估校准方法的框架,并提供额外的见解和建议,以提高模型校准的稳健性。这是通过对一套屈曲约束支撑框架(brbf)进行分析实现的。首先,对一种常用滞回模型的参数进行了全面的全局敏感性分析(GSA),该模型是基于先前多次混合仿真得出的概率输入模型。GSA是通过使用基于元模型的多项式混沌展开(pce)方法评估Sobol指数来进行的。接下来,考虑到每个现实LH在相应迟滞曲线的过渡范围和塑性范围的特征,从每个现实LH中提取20个特征。然后提出了基于这些特征的聚类LH选择准则,以确定具有更大CR值的LHs的最佳聚类,这是在结构系统的全局模型中实现更高精度所需要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics
Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 工程技术-工程:地质
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
13.30%
发文量
180
审稿时长
4.8 months
期刊介绍: Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics provides a forum for the publication of papers on several aspects of engineering related to earthquakes. The problems in this field, and their solutions, are international in character and require knowledge of several traditional disciplines; the Journal will reflect this. Papers that may be relevant but do not emphasize earthquake engineering and related structural dynamics are not suitable for the Journal. Relevant topics include the following: ground motions for analysis and design geotechnical earthquake engineering probabilistic and deterministic methods of dynamic analysis experimental behaviour of structures seismic protective systems system identification risk assessment seismic code requirements methods for earthquake-resistant design and retrofit of structures.
期刊最新文献
Issue information Issue information Bayesian Identification of Soil-Structure Systems Using Seismic Response Measurements: A Case Study on a Field Test Structure Combined Vertical and Horizontal Components of Near-Source Earthquakes and Impact on Base-Isolated Structures Structural Health Monitoring of a Unidirectional Isolation Bridge: Bidirectional Seismic Behavior, Stochastic Model Updating, and Prediction
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1