Seismic Capacity of Unstrengthened and FRP Strengthened Masonry Arches: Tilting Test and Nonlinear Numerical Analysis

IF 4.3 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, CIVIL Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics Pub Date : 2024-12-23 DOI:10.1002/eqe.4294
İsmail Hakkı Tarhan, Nathanaël Savalle, Habib Uysal, Luis C. M. da Silva, Paulo B. Lourenço
{"title":"Seismic Capacity of Unstrengthened and FRP Strengthened Masonry Arches: Tilting Test and Nonlinear Numerical Analysis","authors":"İsmail Hakkı Tarhan,&nbsp;Nathanaël Savalle,&nbsp;Habib Uysal,&nbsp;Luis C. M. da Silva,&nbsp;Paulo B. Lourenço","doi":"10.1002/eqe.4294","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Cultural heritage preservation requires a deeper understanding of their seismic response and imposes the use of effective strengthening methods. Fibre-reinforced polymers (FRP) have emerged as an effective solution for strengthening masonry structural elements. The decision over the optimal configuration for a FRP-based strengthening is a trade-off between different objective functions such as strength, inelastic stiffness and cost. Although some studies have explored design alternatives and topology optimisation, experimental investigation remains limited, especially regarding the evaluation of seismic response. This study investigates the seismic capacity of unstrengthened and strengthened mortared–masonry arches through tilting table experiments and numerical simulations. The optimal strengthening arrangement is obtained through topology optimisation, and experimental results demonstrate its performance. A three-dimensional numerical model, following a macro-modelling approach through the so-called concrete damage plasticity material model, is adopted. Numerical results are validated with existing literature and experimental data. A parametric study is conducted for full-scale arches to evaluate the effect of dimensions and the embrace angle of masonry arches. The study reveals that the numerical model successfully replicates masonry arches' nonlinear behaviour and hinge mechanism. In addition, both experimental and numerical results highlight the effectiveness of optimised strengthening placement achieved through topology optimisation.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":11390,"journal":{"name":"Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics","volume":"54 3","pages":"1009-1027"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/eqe.4294","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Cultural heritage preservation requires a deeper understanding of their seismic response and imposes the use of effective strengthening methods. Fibre-reinforced polymers (FRP) have emerged as an effective solution for strengthening masonry structural elements. The decision over the optimal configuration for a FRP-based strengthening is a trade-off between different objective functions such as strength, inelastic stiffness and cost. Although some studies have explored design alternatives and topology optimisation, experimental investigation remains limited, especially regarding the evaluation of seismic response. This study investigates the seismic capacity of unstrengthened and strengthened mortared–masonry arches through tilting table experiments and numerical simulations. The optimal strengthening arrangement is obtained through topology optimisation, and experimental results demonstrate its performance. A three-dimensional numerical model, following a macro-modelling approach through the so-called concrete damage plasticity material model, is adopted. Numerical results are validated with existing literature and experimental data. A parametric study is conducted for full-scale arches to evaluate the effect of dimensions and the embrace angle of masonry arches. The study reveals that the numerical model successfully replicates masonry arches' nonlinear behaviour and hinge mechanism. In addition, both experimental and numerical results highlight the effectiveness of optimised strengthening placement achieved through topology optimisation.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics
Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 工程技术-工程:地质
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
13.30%
发文量
180
审稿时长
4.8 months
期刊介绍: Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics provides a forum for the publication of papers on several aspects of engineering related to earthquakes. The problems in this field, and their solutions, are international in character and require knowledge of several traditional disciplines; the Journal will reflect this. Papers that may be relevant but do not emphasize earthquake engineering and related structural dynamics are not suitable for the Journal. Relevant topics include the following: ground motions for analysis and design geotechnical earthquake engineering probabilistic and deterministic methods of dynamic analysis experimental behaviour of structures seismic protective systems system identification risk assessment seismic code requirements methods for earthquake-resistant design and retrofit of structures.
期刊最新文献
Issue information Issue information Issue information Model Development and Validation for a Seismic Isolation System for Lightweight Structures Influence of Seismic Direction on Dynamic Responses of Wind Turbine in Operation: An Experimental Study by Combining Wind Tunnel and Shaking Table Tests
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1