Zhining Huang MSc, Gaoxiang Wang MD, Liangdong Xu MSc, Shijun Cui MSc, Xiaohui Sun PhD, Tian Li PhD, Jun Wang PhD, Meiqing Xu MSc, Mingran Xie MD
{"title":"Prognostic value of the preoperative ratio of fibrinogen to prealbumin in patients undergoing radical resection for lung cancer","authors":"Zhining Huang MSc, Gaoxiang Wang MD, Liangdong Xu MSc, Shijun Cui MSc, Xiaohui Sun PhD, Tian Li PhD, Jun Wang PhD, Meiqing Xu MSc, Mingran Xie MD","doi":"10.1111/ans.19391","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>To investigate the significance of preoperative fibrinogen-to-prealbumin ratio (FPR) in the prognosis of non-small cell lung cancer.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>The clinical follow-up pathological data of 289 patients who underwent radical lung cancer resection and were pathologically diagnosed with non-small cell lung cancer after surgery were retrospectively analysed, and the FPR value was calculated according to the serological test results within 1 week before surgery. The cut-off value of FPR was obtained by analysing the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC). Kaplan–Meier analysis was used to describe the survival curve, and Cox proportional hazards model was used to explore the risk factors affecting prognosis.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>When the FPR value was 10.96, the Youden index was the highest, with a sensitivity of 62.4% and a specificity of 69.6%. The cumulative five-year survival rate in the low FPR group was significantly higher than that in the high FPR group (81.4% versus 54.7%). Univariate and multivariate analyses showed that FPR level was a risk factor for prognosis.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>There is a correlation between FPR level and the prognosis of lung cancer patients, and early intervention should be implemented for patients with high FPR before surgery.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":8158,"journal":{"name":"ANZ Journal of Surgery","volume":"95 1-2","pages":"91-99"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ANZ Journal of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ans.19391","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
To investigate the significance of preoperative fibrinogen-to-prealbumin ratio (FPR) in the prognosis of non-small cell lung cancer.
Methods
The clinical follow-up pathological data of 289 patients who underwent radical lung cancer resection and were pathologically diagnosed with non-small cell lung cancer after surgery were retrospectively analysed, and the FPR value was calculated according to the serological test results within 1 week before surgery. The cut-off value of FPR was obtained by analysing the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC). Kaplan–Meier analysis was used to describe the survival curve, and Cox proportional hazards model was used to explore the risk factors affecting prognosis.
Results
When the FPR value was 10.96, the Youden index was the highest, with a sensitivity of 62.4% and a specificity of 69.6%. The cumulative five-year survival rate in the low FPR group was significantly higher than that in the high FPR group (81.4% versus 54.7%). Univariate and multivariate analyses showed that FPR level was a risk factor for prognosis.
Conclusion
There is a correlation between FPR level and the prognosis of lung cancer patients, and early intervention should be implemented for patients with high FPR before surgery.
期刊介绍:
ANZ Journal of Surgery is published by Wiley on behalf of the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons to provide a medium for the publication of peer-reviewed original contributions related to clinical practice and/or research in all fields of surgery and related disciplines. It also provides a programme of continuing education for surgeons. All articles are peer-reviewed by at least two researchers expert in the field of the submitted paper.