No sex differences in performance and perceived fatigability during a self-paced endurance exercise performed under moderate hypoxia.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q3 PHYSIOLOGY American journal of physiology. Regulatory, integrative and comparative physiology Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-10 DOI:10.1152/ajpregu.00145.2024
Julio S Hasegawa, Andre C Silveira, Rafael A Azevedo, Julio Cezar Schamne, Maria Urbana Pinto Brandão Rondon, Marcelo Papoti, Adriano Eduardo Lima-Silva, Michael S Koehle, Romulo Bertuzzi
{"title":"No sex differences in performance and perceived fatigability during a self-paced endurance exercise performed under moderate hypoxia.","authors":"Julio S Hasegawa, Andre C Silveira, Rafael A Azevedo, Julio Cezar Schamne, Maria Urbana Pinto Brandão Rondon, Marcelo Papoti, Adriano Eduardo Lima-Silva, Michael S Koehle, Romulo Bertuzzi","doi":"10.1152/ajpregu.00145.2024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study examined potential sex differences in performance and perceived fatigability during a whole body endurance exercise performed under normoxia or moderate hypoxia. Nine males and eight females cyclists performed a 4-km cycling time trial under normoxia or hypoxia conditions. Performance fatigability and its central and peripheral determinants were measured via pre- to post-exercise changes in maximal voluntary isometric contraction (IMVC), voluntary activation (VA), and potentiated twitch force (TwPt) of knee extensors, respectively. Perceived fatigability was characterized via a rating of perceived exertion (RPE). Time to complete the trial was longer in hypoxia than normoxia in females (482 ± 24 vs. 465 ± 21 s) and males (433 ± 30 vs. 408 ± 31 s) (<i>P</i> = 0.039). There was no effect of sex or condition (<i>P</i> ≥ 0.370) for the magnitude of decrease in IMVC (female: normoxia = -14.3 ± 4.4%, hypoxia = -11.8 ± 5.2% vs. male: normoxia = -13.1 ± 9.4%, hypoxia = -12.9 ± 9.8%), TwPt (female: normoxia = -34.4 ± 11.4%, hypoxia = -31.8 ± 18.9% vs. male: normoxia = -30.5 ± 17.9%, hypoxia = -31.9 ± 20.9%), and VA (female: normoxia = -0.5 ± 2.3%, hypoxia = -1.6 ± 1.6% vs. male: normoxia = 0.8 ± 2.2%, hypoxia = -0.5 ± 1.3%). RPE was higher in hypoxia than in normoxia for both groups (<i>P</i> = 0.002). In conclusion, moderate hypoxia similarly impairs performance and perceived fatigability development in females and males during a 4-km cycling time trial.<b>NEW & NOTEWORTHY</b> In this study, we showed that females and males develop a similar hypoxia-induced impairment in endurance performance, perceived and performance fatigability during a 4-km cycling time trial. These novel findings indicate that females and males regulate their power output similarly during a 4-km cycling time trial under moderate hypoxia, likely to avoid prematurely exacerbating metabolic disturbances and thereby reaching comparable levels of performance fatigability by the end of the task.</p>","PeriodicalId":7630,"journal":{"name":"American journal of physiology. Regulatory, integrative and comparative physiology","volume":" ","pages":"R352-R363"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of physiology. Regulatory, integrative and comparative physiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpregu.00145.2024","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHYSIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study examined potential sex differences in performance and perceived fatigability during a whole body endurance exercise performed under normoxia or moderate hypoxia. Nine males and eight females cyclists performed a 4-km cycling time trial under normoxia or hypoxia conditions. Performance fatigability and its central and peripheral determinants were measured via pre- to post-exercise changes in maximal voluntary isometric contraction (IMVC), voluntary activation (VA), and potentiated twitch force (TwPt) of knee extensors, respectively. Perceived fatigability was characterized via a rating of perceived exertion (RPE). Time to complete the trial was longer in hypoxia than normoxia in females (482 ± 24 vs. 465 ± 21 s) and males (433 ± 30 vs. 408 ± 31 s) (P = 0.039). There was no effect of sex or condition (P ≥ 0.370) for the magnitude of decrease in IMVC (female: normoxia = -14.3 ± 4.4%, hypoxia = -11.8 ± 5.2% vs. male: normoxia = -13.1 ± 9.4%, hypoxia = -12.9 ± 9.8%), TwPt (female: normoxia = -34.4 ± 11.4%, hypoxia = -31.8 ± 18.9% vs. male: normoxia = -30.5 ± 17.9%, hypoxia = -31.9 ± 20.9%), and VA (female: normoxia = -0.5 ± 2.3%, hypoxia = -1.6 ± 1.6% vs. male: normoxia = 0.8 ± 2.2%, hypoxia = -0.5 ± 1.3%). RPE was higher in hypoxia than in normoxia for both groups (P = 0.002). In conclusion, moderate hypoxia similarly impairs performance and perceived fatigability development in females and males during a 4-km cycling time trial.NEW & NOTEWORTHY In this study, we showed that females and males develop a similar hypoxia-induced impairment in endurance performance, perceived and performance fatigability during a 4-km cycling time trial. These novel findings indicate that females and males regulate their power output similarly during a 4-km cycling time trial under moderate hypoxia, likely to avoid prematurely exacerbating metabolic disturbances and thereby reaching comparable levels of performance fatigability by the end of the task.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在中度缺氧条件下进行的自定节奏耐力运动中,表现和感知疲劳无性别差异。
本研究考察了在常氧或中度缺氧条件下进行全身耐力运动时表现和感知疲劳的潜在性别差异。9名男性和8名女性自行车手在正常或缺氧条件下进行了4公里的自行车计时赛。通过运动前和运动后最大自主等距收缩(IMVC)、自主激活(VA)和增强的膝伸肌抽搐力(TwPt)的变化,分别测量了表现疲劳及其中枢和外周决定因素。感知疲劳通过感知劳累评分(RPE)来表征。女性低氧组完成试验的时间(482±24 vs 465±21 s)和男性低氧组完成试验的时间(433±30 vs 408±31 s) (P = 0.039)。性没有影响或条件(P≥0.370)的大小减少IMVC(女:normoxia = -14.3±4.4%,缺氧= -11.8±5.2% vs男:normoxia = -13.1±9.4%,缺氧= -12.9±9.8%),TwPt(女:normoxia = -34.4±11.4%,缺氧= -31.8±18.9% vs男:normoxia = -30.5±17.9%,缺氧= -31.9±20.9%),和VA(女:normoxia = -0.5±2.3%,缺氧= -1.6±1.6% vs男:normoxia = 0.8±2.2%,缺氧= -0.5±1.3%)。两组低氧组RPE均高于常氧组(P = 0.002)。综上所述,在4公里自行车计时赛中,中度缺氧同样会损害女性和男性的表现和感知疲劳的发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
3.60%
发文量
145
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Physiology-Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology publishes original investigations that illuminate normal or abnormal regulation and integration of physiological mechanisms at all levels of biological organization, ranging from molecules to humans, including clinical investigations. Major areas of emphasis include regulation in genetically modified animals; model organisms; development and tissue plasticity; neurohumoral control of circulation and hypertension; local control of circulation; cardiac and renal integration; thirst and volume, electrolyte homeostasis; glucose homeostasis and energy balance; appetite and obesity; inflammation and cytokines; integrative physiology of pregnancy-parturition-lactation; and thermoregulation and adaptations to exercise and environmental stress.
期刊最新文献
Exaggerated systolic blood pressure response to late night low- and high-intensity resistance exercise in healthy young men. Loss of ovarian function and estrogen therapy remodel the brain's synaptic and metabolic proteome. Molecular shifts induced by pseudohypoxia in gray seal blubber: an ex vivo approach. A stage of mechanisms of pathological cerebral blood flow reduction due to severe central hypovolemia: a study using maximal lower body negative pressure. Trigeminal reflex regulation of sympathetic neural communication strategies in human muscle sympathetic nerve activity.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1