Mortality and morbidity after transcatheter aortic valve implantation compared to an age- and sex-matched control population: a population-based study from the SWEDEHEART registry.

IF 4.6 2区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS European Heart Journal - Quality of Care and Clinical Outcomes Pub Date : 2025-08-11 DOI:10.1093/ehjqcco/qcaf008
Maria Lachonius, Susanne J Nielsen, Kok Wai Giang, Jenny Backes, Henrik Bjursten, Henrik Hagström, Stefan James, Magnus Settergren, Kristofer Skoglund, Anders Jeppsson, Pétur Pétursson
{"title":"Mortality and morbidity after transcatheter aortic valve implantation compared to an age- and sex-matched control population: a population-based study from the SWEDEHEART registry.","authors":"Maria Lachonius, Susanne J Nielsen, Kok Wai Giang, Jenny Backes, Henrik Bjursten, Henrik Hagström, Stefan James, Magnus Settergren, Kristofer Skoglund, Anders Jeppsson, Pétur Pétursson","doi":"10.1093/ehjqcco/qcaf008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Data are lacking about the risk for death and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI), compared to the general population. Therefore, we assessed the risk for all-cause death and MACE after TAVI in patients aged 65 years and older, in comparison to an age- and sex-matched control population.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>In total, 5924 TAVI patients and 10 928 matched controls [mean age 82.1, standard deviation (SD) 6.0, and 81.9, SD 6.1, respectively] were included from 2014 to 2020. The SWEDEHEART registry and four mandatory national registers were used to collect data. Cox regression models were used to assess the association with all-cause mortality and MACE risk. In total, 1410 (23.8%) of the TAVI patients and 2115 (19.4%) controls died during the follow-up period. Median follow-up was 1.9 years (inter quartile range 0.9-3.3) respectively. The crude mortality and MACE risks were higher in TAVI patients than in controls {hazard ratios 1.27 [95% Confidence interval (CI): 1.19-1.36] and HR 1.44 (95% CI: 1.35-1.53), respectively}. After adjustment, there was a lower risk for both mortality and MACE in TAVI patients [adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) 0.77 (95% CI: 0.71-0.84) and aHR 0.90 (95% CI: 0.83-0.98), respectively].</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>After adjustments for comorbidities, the mortality risk was lower in TAVI patients, compared with an age- and sex-matched control population. These findings suggest that the high burden of comorbidities in TAVI patients has a strong impact on the risk for mortality and MACE after TAVI.</p>","PeriodicalId":11869,"journal":{"name":"European Heart Journal - Quality of Care and Clinical Outcomes","volume":" ","pages":"614-621"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12342861/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Heart Journal - Quality of Care and Clinical Outcomes","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjqcco/qcaf008","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Data are lacking about the risk for death and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI), compared to the general population. Therefore, we assessed the risk for all-cause death and MACE after TAVI in patients aged 65 years and older, in comparison to an age- and sex-matched control population.

Methods and results: In total, 5924 TAVI patients and 10 928 matched controls [mean age 82.1, standard deviation (SD) 6.0, and 81.9, SD 6.1, respectively] were included from 2014 to 2020. The SWEDEHEART registry and four mandatory national registers were used to collect data. Cox regression models were used to assess the association with all-cause mortality and MACE risk. In total, 1410 (23.8%) of the TAVI patients and 2115 (19.4%) controls died during the follow-up period. Median follow-up was 1.9 years (inter quartile range 0.9-3.3) respectively. The crude mortality and MACE risks were higher in TAVI patients than in controls {hazard ratios 1.27 [95% Confidence interval (CI): 1.19-1.36] and HR 1.44 (95% CI: 1.35-1.53), respectively}. After adjustment, there was a lower risk for both mortality and MACE in TAVI patients [adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) 0.77 (95% CI: 0.71-0.84) and aHR 0.90 (95% CI: 0.83-0.98), respectively].

Conclusion: After adjustments for comorbidities, the mortality risk was lower in TAVI patients, compared with an age- and sex-matched control population. These findings suggest that the high burden of comorbidities in TAVI patients has a strong impact on the risk for mortality and MACE after TAVI.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
经导管主动脉瓣植入术后的死亡率和发病率与年龄和性别匹配的对照人群的比较:来自SWEDEHEART登记的一项基于人群的研究。
与普通人群相比,经导管主动脉瓣植入术(TAVI)后死亡和主要不良心血管事件(MACE)风险的数据缺乏。因此,我们评估了65岁及以上TAVI患者的全因死亡和MACE风险,并与年龄和性别匹配的对照人群进行了比较。方法:2014 - 2020年共纳入5 924例TAVI患者和10 928例匹配的对照组(平均年龄分别为82.1,SD 6.0和81.9,SD 6.1)。使用SWEDEHEART登记处和四个强制性国家登记处收集数据。使用Cox回归模型评估与全因死亡率和MACE风险的关系。结果:随访期间,TAVI患者死亡1410例(23.8%),对照组死亡2115例(19.4%)。中位随访时间分别为1.9年(IQR 0.9-3.3)。TAVI患者的粗死亡率和MACE风险均高于对照组(风险比分别为1.27[95%可信区间(CI): 1.19-1.36]和1.44 [95% CI: 1.35-1.53])。校正后,TAVI患者的死亡率和MACE风险均较低(校正危险比(aHR)分别为0.77 [95% CI: 0.71-0.84]和0.90 [95% CI: 0.83-0.98])。结论:在调整合并症后,与年龄和性别匹配的对照组相比,TAVI患者的死亡风险较低。这些研究结果表明,TAVI患者的高合并症负担对TAVI后死亡率和MACE风险有很强的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
3.80%
发文量
76
期刊介绍: European Heart Journal - Quality of Care & Clinical Outcomes is an English language, peer-reviewed journal dedicated to publishing cardiovascular outcomes research. It serves as an official journal of the European Society of Cardiology and maintains a close alliance with the European Heart Health Institute. The journal disseminates original research and topical reviews contributed by health scientists globally, with a focus on the quality of care and its impact on cardiovascular outcomes at the hospital, national, and international levels. It provides a platform for presenting the most outstanding cardiovascular outcomes research to influence cardiovascular public health policy on a global scale. Additionally, the journal aims to motivate young investigators and foster the growth of the outcomes research community.
期刊最新文献
Five-year outcomes following catheter ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: a propensity matched analysis of 51 182 patients from a real world cohort. Low-dose aspirin and risk of anaemia in older adults: insights from a Danish register-based cohort study. Quality of life effects of renal artery stenting versus medical therapy for atherosclerotic renal-artery stenosis: results from the randomized CORAL trial. Treatment with PCSK9 monoclonal antibodies is associated with discontinuation of oral lipid lowering therapy. Specialist services for cardiomyopathy: quality care requires diagnostic accuracy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1