Effectiveness of the Modified WHO Labour Care Guide to Detect Prolonged and Obstructed Labour Among Women Admitted at Eight Publicly Funded, Midwife-Led Community Health Facilities in Rural Mbarara District, Southwestern Uganda: An Ambispective Cohort Study.

Abstract

Background: Obstructed labour, a sequel of prolonged labour, remains a significant contributor to maternal and perinatal deaths in low resource settings.

Objective: We evaluated the modified WHO labour care guide (LCG) in detecting prolonged/obstructed labour compared to the traditional partograph at publicly funded maternity centers in Southwestern Uganda.

Methods: LCG was deployed to monitor labour by trained health care providers in 2023. We reviewed all patient labour monitoring records for the first quarter of 2024 (LCG-intervention) and 2023 (partograph-before LCG introduction) from eight randomized maternity centers. Our primary outcome was the proportion of women diagnosed with prolonged and or obstructed labour. Secondary outcomes included: mode of delivery, labour augmentation, stillbirths, maternal deaths, Apgar score, uterine rupture, postpartum haemorrhage and tool completion. Data was collected in REDcap and analyzed using STATA v17; statistical significance was p < 0.05.

Results: A total of 991 (49.3%) and 1020 (50.7%) women were monitored using the LCG and partograph, respectively. The mean maternal and gestation ages were similar between the two groups, reported at 25.9 (SD=5.6) years, and 39.4 (SD=1.8) weeks, respectively. Overall, 120 (12.4%) cases of prolonged/obstructed labour were diagnosed (100 for LCG versus 20 for partograph); LCG had six times higher odds of diagnosing prolonged/obstructed labour compared to the partograph (aOR = 5.94;CI 95%3.63-9.73, P < 0.001). Detection of obstructed labour alone using LCG increased 12-fold compared to the partograph (aOR = 11.74;CI 95%3.55-38.74, P < 0.001). We observed increased Caesarean section rates (aOR=6.12;CI 95%4.32-8.67, P < 0.001), augmentation of labour (aOR = 3.11;CI 95%1.81-5.35, P < 0.001), Apgar Score at 5 minutes (aOR = 2.29;CI 95%1.11-5.77, P = 0.025) and tool completion rate (aOR = 2.11;CI 95%1.08-5.44, P < 0.001). We observed no differences in stillbirths, maternal deaths, postpartum haemorrhage and uterine rupture.

Conclusion: Our data shows that LCG diagnosed more cases of prolonged and obstructed labour compared to the partograph among women delivering at rural publicly funded midwife-led facilities in Southwestern Uganda. More controlled and powered studies should evaluate the two tools in different facilities and sub-populations.

Trial registration: This trial registration was registered with clinical trials.gov number NCT05979194 on 2023-08-07, and the protocol was published by BMJ open, as 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-079216 on 15 April 2024.21 Trial registration number NCT05979194 clinical trials.gov.