Demographic and topographic findings suggesting poor response to crosslinking-iontophoresis in patients with progressive keratoconus.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 OPHTHALMOLOGY International Ophthalmology Pub Date : 2025-02-10 DOI:10.1007/s10792-025-03421-9
Rosario Touriño-Peralba, Julio Rodríguez-Lago, David Lamas-Francis, Laura Martínez-Pérez, Teresa Rodríguez-Ares
{"title":"Demographic and topographic findings suggesting poor response to crosslinking-iontophoresis in patients with progressive keratoconus.","authors":"Rosario Touriño-Peralba, Julio Rodríguez-Lago, David Lamas-Francis, Laura Martínez-Pérez, Teresa Rodríguez-Ares","doi":"10.1007/s10792-025-03421-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate demographic and tomographical parameters in predicting treatment response following transepithelial iontophoresis-assisted corneal cross-linking (I-CXL) for progressive keratoconus.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Forty eyes (20 aged < 19 years and 20 aged ≥ 19 years) underwent I-CXL treatment between 2016 and 2022. Progression criteria based on the ABCD system, changes in asphericity (Q), demographic factors and keratoconus phenotypes were evaluated. Subjects were followed for 24 months after procedure.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty percent of participants were male. The mean age at the time of treatment was 21.0 ± 6.0 years. All tomographical values showed progression after 2 years of follow-up (p < 0.05), particularly during the first 6 months, except for anterior curvature. Within the ABCD grading system, we observed: A) an increase in anterior curvature, more evident with lower initial values; B) an increase in posterior curvature, more pronounced with higher initial values. Two years after I-CXL, 20% of subjects met progression criteria in two or more parameters, with 62.5% being under 19 years of age. Patients with a family history of corneal ectasia exhibited a mean KMax progression of 1.94D ± 1.88, (p = 0.046). Only phenotypes 3 and 4 showed progression. Although patients under 19 years showed greater progression in all tomographical variables at the end of the study, this difference was not statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Treatment with I-CXL did not stop progression in the variables studied two years after the procedure in an effective manner, especially in patients younger than 19 years. A family history of corneal ectasia and subtype 4 keratoconus predicted a less favourable response to I-CXL.</p>","PeriodicalId":14473,"journal":{"name":"International Ophthalmology","volume":"45 1","pages":"69"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11811480/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-025-03421-9","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate demographic and tomographical parameters in predicting treatment response following transepithelial iontophoresis-assisted corneal cross-linking (I-CXL) for progressive keratoconus.

Methods: Forty eyes (20 aged < 19 years and 20 aged ≥ 19 years) underwent I-CXL treatment between 2016 and 2022. Progression criteria based on the ABCD system, changes in asphericity (Q), demographic factors and keratoconus phenotypes were evaluated. Subjects were followed for 24 months after procedure.

Results: Sixty percent of participants were male. The mean age at the time of treatment was 21.0 ± 6.0 years. All tomographical values showed progression after 2 years of follow-up (p < 0.05), particularly during the first 6 months, except for anterior curvature. Within the ABCD grading system, we observed: A) an increase in anterior curvature, more evident with lower initial values; B) an increase in posterior curvature, more pronounced with higher initial values. Two years after I-CXL, 20% of subjects met progression criteria in two or more parameters, with 62.5% being under 19 years of age. Patients with a family history of corneal ectasia exhibited a mean KMax progression of 1.94D ± 1.88, (p = 0.046). Only phenotypes 3 and 4 showed progression. Although patients under 19 years showed greater progression in all tomographical variables at the end of the study, this difference was not statistically significant.

Conclusion: Treatment with I-CXL did not stop progression in the variables studied two years after the procedure in an effective manner, especially in patients younger than 19 years. A family history of corneal ectasia and subtype 4 keratoconus predicted a less favourable response to I-CXL.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
451
期刊介绍: International Ophthalmology provides the clinician with articles on all the relevant subspecialties of ophthalmology, with a broad international scope. The emphasis is on presentation of the latest clinical research in the field. In addition, the journal includes regular sections devoted to new developments in technologies, products, and techniques.
期刊最新文献
The role of triglyceride-glucose index in central retinal artery occlusion. Clinico-tomographic-pathological correlation in nodulo-ulcerative ocular surface squamous neoplasia: a study of 16 cases. Exploring the efficacy and safety of neuroprotective agents in optic neuritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Agreement between Scheimpflug-Placido topographer (Sirius®) and anterior-segment swept-source optical coherence tomography (ANTERİON®) devices for corneal high order aberrations in keratoconic and healthy eyes. Exploring the immunological underpinnings of allergic conjunctivitis: the role of CD4 + T Cells and SLAM expression in ocular surface disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1