Development and Validation of a Cost-Effective Machine Learning Model for Screening Potential Rheumatoid Arthritis in Primary Healthcare Clinics.

IF 4.1 2区 医学 Q2 IMMUNOLOGY Journal of Inflammation Research Pub Date : 2025-02-03 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/JIR.S487595
Wenqi Wu, Xiaohao Hu, Linyang Yan, Zhiyin Li, Bo Li, Xinpeng Chen, Zexun Lin, Huiqiong Zeng, Chun Li, Yingqian Mo, Yalin Wu, Qingwen Wang
{"title":"Development and Validation of a Cost-Effective Machine Learning Model for Screening Potential Rheumatoid Arthritis in Primary Healthcare Clinics.","authors":"Wenqi Wu, Xiaohao Hu, Linyang Yan, Zhiyin Li, Bo Li, Xinpeng Chen, Zexun Lin, Huiqiong Zeng, Chun Li, Yingqian Mo, Yalin Wu, Qingwen Wang","doi":"10.2147/JIR.S487595","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>In primary healthcare, diagnosing rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is challenging due to a general lack of in-depth knowledge of RA by general practitioners (GPs) and the lack of effective tools, leading to high rates of missed diagnosis. This study focuses on a screening model for primary healthcare, aiming to improve early RA screening accuracy and efficiency at a relatively lower cost, reducing delays in GPs' recognition of RA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We randomly selected 2106 participants from the RA group or combined control group (comprising healthy individuals and patients with non-RA rheumatic diseases) at Peking University Shenzhen Hospital as the developing cohort. Guided by experienced rheumatologists, we built a comprehensive database with 26 clinical features. Using 10 classical machine learning algorithms, we developed screening models. Evaluation metrics determined the best model. Employing multivariatelogistic regression results and the best-performing model to identify the least costly features, ensuring applicability in primary healthcare clinics. Subsequently, we retrained and validated our proposed model based on two primary healthcare validation cohorts.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In experiments, the algorithms achieved over 88% accuracy on training and test sets. Random Forest (RF) excelled with 96.20% (95% CI 95.39% to 97.02%) accuracy, 96.22% (95% CI 95.40% to 97.03%) specificity, 96.18% (95% CI 95.37% to 97.00%) sensitivity, and 96.20% (95% CI 95.39% to 97.02%) Areas Under Curves (AUC). A meticulous feature selection identified 11 key features for RA screening. In an external test on two primary healthcare datasets with these features, RF demonstrated an accuracy of 88.435% (95% CI 85.55% to 91.32%), sensitivity of 98.55% (95% CI 97.47% to 99.63%), specificity of 85.56% (95% CI 82.39% to 88.73%), and an AUC of 92.055% (95% CI 89.62% to 94.49%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The screening model excels in automating prompt identification of RA in primary healthcare, improving the early detection of RA, and reducing delays and associated costs. Our findings contribute positively and are poised to elevate prospective RA management, fostering improvements in healthcare sector responsiveness and resource efficiency.</p>","PeriodicalId":16107,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Inflammation Research","volume":"18 ","pages":"1511-1522"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11804240/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Inflammation Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/JIR.S487595","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: In primary healthcare, diagnosing rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is challenging due to a general lack of in-depth knowledge of RA by general practitioners (GPs) and the lack of effective tools, leading to high rates of missed diagnosis. This study focuses on a screening model for primary healthcare, aiming to improve early RA screening accuracy and efficiency at a relatively lower cost, reducing delays in GPs' recognition of RA.

Methods: We randomly selected 2106 participants from the RA group or combined control group (comprising healthy individuals and patients with non-RA rheumatic diseases) at Peking University Shenzhen Hospital as the developing cohort. Guided by experienced rheumatologists, we built a comprehensive database with 26 clinical features. Using 10 classical machine learning algorithms, we developed screening models. Evaluation metrics determined the best model. Employing multivariatelogistic regression results and the best-performing model to identify the least costly features, ensuring applicability in primary healthcare clinics. Subsequently, we retrained and validated our proposed model based on two primary healthcare validation cohorts.

Results: In experiments, the algorithms achieved over 88% accuracy on training and test sets. Random Forest (RF) excelled with 96.20% (95% CI 95.39% to 97.02%) accuracy, 96.22% (95% CI 95.40% to 97.03%) specificity, 96.18% (95% CI 95.37% to 97.00%) sensitivity, and 96.20% (95% CI 95.39% to 97.02%) Areas Under Curves (AUC). A meticulous feature selection identified 11 key features for RA screening. In an external test on two primary healthcare datasets with these features, RF demonstrated an accuracy of 88.435% (95% CI 85.55% to 91.32%), sensitivity of 98.55% (95% CI 97.47% to 99.63%), specificity of 85.56% (95% CI 82.39% to 88.73%), and an AUC of 92.055% (95% CI 89.62% to 94.49%).

Conclusion: The screening model excels in automating prompt identification of RA in primary healthcare, improving the early detection of RA, and reducing delays and associated costs. Our findings contribute positively and are poised to elevate prospective RA management, fostering improvements in healthcare sector responsiveness and resource efficiency.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
开发和验证具有成本效益的机器学习模型筛选潜在类风湿关节炎在初级保健诊所。
目的:在初级卫生保健中,由于全科医生(gp)普遍缺乏对类风湿关节炎(RA)的深入了解和缺乏有效的工具,诊断类风湿关节炎(RA)具有挑战性,导致高漏诊率。本研究旨在建立一种初级卫生保健筛查模型,以相对较低的成本提高RA早期筛查的准确性和效率,减少全科医生对RA的延迟识别。方法:从北京大学深圳医院RA组或联合对照组(包括健康个体和非RA风湿病患者)中随机抽取2106例受试者作为发展队列。在经验丰富的风湿病学家的指导下,我们建立了一个包含26个临床特征的综合数据库。利用10种经典的机器学习算法,我们开发了筛选模型。评估指标确定了最佳模型。采用多变量回归结果和最佳性能模型来确定成本最低的特征,确保初级卫生保健诊所的适用性。随后,我们基于两个主要医疗保健验证队列重新训练和验证了我们提出的模型。结果:在实验中,算法在训练集和测试集上的准确率均达到88%以上。随机森林(RF)的准确率为96.20% (95% CI 95.39% ~ 97.02%),特异性为96.22% (95% CI 95.40% ~ 97.03%),灵敏度为96.18% (95% CI 95.37% ~ 97.00%),曲线下面积(AUC)为96.20% (95% CI 95.39% ~ 97.02%)。细致的特征选择确定了RA筛选的11个关键特征。在具有这些特征的两个主要医疗保健数据集的外部测试中,RF显示准确率为88.435% (95% CI 85.55%至91.32%),灵敏度为98.55% (95% CI 97.47%至99.63%),特异性为85.56% (95% CI 82.39%至88.73%),AUC为92.055% (95% CI 89.62%至94.49%)。结论:该筛选模型在初级卫生保健中能够自动及时识别RA,提高RA的早期发现,减少延误和相关费用。我们的研究结果有积极的贡献,有望提高RA的管理水平,促进医疗保健部门响应能力和资源效率的提高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Inflammation Research
Journal of Inflammation Research Immunology and Microbiology-Immunology
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
2.20%
发文量
658
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: An international, peer-reviewed, open access, online journal that welcomes laboratory and clinical findings on the molecular basis, cell biology and pharmacology of inflammation.
期刊最新文献
Impaired Macrophage Efferocytosis: Shared Mechanisms and Therapeutic Implications in Immune-Mediated Inflammatory Diseases. Alopecia Areata and Atopic Dermatitis: Common Mechanisms and Emerging Therapeutics. Kadsua coccinea Extract Alleviates Rheumatoid Arthritis via TNF-α Suppression and Gut Microbiota Modulation. Factors Associated with ICU Admission and In-Hospital Mortality in Patients with Acute Pancreatitis: A Single-Center Retrospective Study. The Role of Histone Modifications in Acute Lung Injury: Molecular Mechanisms and Potential of Traditional Chinese Medicine Treatment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1