Infection Risk in Patients with Mixed Flora in Urine Cultures Prior to Ureteroscopy.

IF 2.9 2区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Journal of endourology Pub Date : 2025-02-10 DOI:10.1089/end.2024.0670
Joshua K Kim, Ezra J Margolin, David L Barquin, Rebekah W Moehring, Jodi A Antonelli, Michael E Lipkin, Glenn M Preminger, Charles D Scales, Gary J Faerber, Robert A Medairos
{"title":"Infection Risk in Patients with Mixed Flora in Urine Cultures Prior to Ureteroscopy.","authors":"Joshua K Kim, Ezra J Margolin, David L Barquin, Rebekah W Moehring, Jodi A Antonelli, Michael E Lipkin, Glenn M Preminger, Charles D Scales, Gary J Faerber, Robert A Medairos","doi":"10.1089/end.2024.0670","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Purpose:</i></b> Urine cultures are routinely used to inform preoperative antibiotic choice and duration prior to endourologic surgery. The presence of mixed flora in preoperative urine cultures holds unclear clinical significance. This study examines infectious outcomes after ureteroscopy in patients with preoperative mixed flora urine cultures. <b><i>Materials and Methods:</i></b> A retrospective cohort study was conducted on adult patients who underwent ureteroscopy with laser lithotripsy between January 2014 and June 2024 who had urine cultures performed within 60 days preoperatively. Patients were categorized into cohorts based on their preoperative urine culture: mixed flora, negative, or positive. Postoperative urinary tract infection rates within 30 days were compared between cohorts, and logistic regression was performed adjusting for demographic and clinical variables. <b><i>Results:</i></b> We identified 5166 patients who underwent ureteroscopy with laser lithotripsy (2139 mixed flora, 1525 negative, 1502 positive). Preoperative antibiotics were used more often in the mixed flora cohort (29%) than in the negative cohort (24%, <i>p</i> = 0.007) but less frequently than in the positive cohort (57%, <i>p</i> < 0.001). Postoperative infections were visualized in 165 patients (8%) in the mixed flora cohort, compared with 88 (6%) in the negative cohort (<i>p</i> = 0.067) and 237 (16%) in the positive cohort (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Multivariable logistic regression demonstrated that positive cultures were associated with an increased risk of infection (odds ratio [OR] = 1.95, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.49-2.55, <i>p</i> < 0.001), but negative cultures had a similar risk of infection compared with mixed flora (OR = 0.79, 95% CI = 0.56-1.11, <i>p</i> = 0.177). Within the mixed flora cohort, preoperative antibiotic treatment was not associated with decreased postoperative infection (OR = 0.99, 95% CI = 0.66-1.47, <i>p</i> = 0.964). <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> While patients with preoperative mixed flora urine cultures received preoperative antibiotics more often than patients with negative urine cultures, they were not at higher risk for postoperative infection. Routine preoperative antibiotic use in patients with mixed flora cultures may not be effective in reducing infectious complications after ureteroscopy.</p>","PeriodicalId":15723,"journal":{"name":"Journal of endourology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of endourology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2024.0670","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Urine cultures are routinely used to inform preoperative antibiotic choice and duration prior to endourologic surgery. The presence of mixed flora in preoperative urine cultures holds unclear clinical significance. This study examines infectious outcomes after ureteroscopy in patients with preoperative mixed flora urine cultures. Materials and Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted on adult patients who underwent ureteroscopy with laser lithotripsy between January 2014 and June 2024 who had urine cultures performed within 60 days preoperatively. Patients were categorized into cohorts based on their preoperative urine culture: mixed flora, negative, or positive. Postoperative urinary tract infection rates within 30 days were compared between cohorts, and logistic regression was performed adjusting for demographic and clinical variables. Results: We identified 5166 patients who underwent ureteroscopy with laser lithotripsy (2139 mixed flora, 1525 negative, 1502 positive). Preoperative antibiotics were used more often in the mixed flora cohort (29%) than in the negative cohort (24%, p = 0.007) but less frequently than in the positive cohort (57%, p < 0.001). Postoperative infections were visualized in 165 patients (8%) in the mixed flora cohort, compared with 88 (6%) in the negative cohort (p = 0.067) and 237 (16%) in the positive cohort (p < 0.001). Multivariable logistic regression demonstrated that positive cultures were associated with an increased risk of infection (odds ratio [OR] = 1.95, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.49-2.55, p < 0.001), but negative cultures had a similar risk of infection compared with mixed flora (OR = 0.79, 95% CI = 0.56-1.11, p = 0.177). Within the mixed flora cohort, preoperative antibiotic treatment was not associated with decreased postoperative infection (OR = 0.99, 95% CI = 0.66-1.47, p = 0.964). Conclusions: While patients with preoperative mixed flora urine cultures received preoperative antibiotics more often than patients with negative urine cultures, they were not at higher risk for postoperative infection. Routine preoperative antibiotic use in patients with mixed flora cultures may not be effective in reducing infectious complications after ureteroscopy.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of endourology
Journal of endourology 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
14.80%
发文量
254
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Endourology, JE Case Reports, and Videourology are the leading peer-reviewed journal, case reports publication, and innovative videojournal companion covering all aspects of minimally invasive urology research, applications, and clinical outcomes. The leading journal of minimally invasive urology for over 30 years, Journal of Endourology is the essential publication for practicing surgeons who want to keep up with the latest surgical technologies in endoscopic, laparoscopic, robotic, and image-guided procedures as they apply to benign and malignant diseases of the genitourinary tract. This flagship journal includes the companion videojournal Videourology™ with every subscription. While Journal of Endourology remains focused on publishing rigorously peer reviewed articles, Videourology accepts original videos containing material that has not been reported elsewhere, except in the form of an abstract or a conference presentation. Journal of Endourology coverage includes: The latest laparoscopic, robotic, endoscopic, and image-guided techniques for treating both benign and malignant conditions Pioneering research articles Controversial cases in endourology Techniques in endourology with accompanying videos Reviews and epochs in endourology Endourology survey section of endourology relevant manuscripts published in other journals.
期刊最新文献
Dr. Jason Lee, MD, MHPE, FRCSC. Comparison of Measurement Methods for Stone Volume Estimation: An In Vitro Study. Is Outpatient Totally Tubeless Standard Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Safe and Efficacious? Risk Factors for Conversion to Open Surgery in Laparoscopic Nephrectomy for Xanthogranulomatous Pyelonephritis: A Multicenter Study. Optimization of Cone Beam Computed Tomography Scan Protocols for the Intraoperative Detection of Residual Stones in Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1