Inflammatory Indices and MAFLD Prevalence in Hypertensive Patients: A Large-Scale Cross-Sectional Analysis from China.

IF 4.1 2区 医学 Q2 IMMUNOLOGY Journal of Inflammation Research Pub Date : 2025-02-04 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/JIR.S503648
Di Shen, Xintian Cai, Junli Hu, Shuaiwei Song, Qing Zhu, Huimin Ma, Yingying Zhang, Rui Ma, Pan Zhou, Wenbo Yang, Jing Hong, Delian Zhang, Nanfang Li
{"title":"Inflammatory Indices and MAFLD Prevalence in Hypertensive Patients: A Large-Scale Cross-Sectional Analysis from China.","authors":"Di Shen, Xintian Cai, Junli Hu, Shuaiwei Song, Qing Zhu, Huimin Ma, Yingying Zhang, Rui Ma, Pan Zhou, Wenbo Yang, Jing Hong, Delian Zhang, Nanfang Li","doi":"10.2147/JIR.S503648","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Hypertension development and progression are largely influenced by inflammation, which plays a critical role by activating the immune system and causing damage to the vascular endothelium. Metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD) is also associated with chronic low-grade inflammation, which drives disease progression via metabolic imbalances and adipose tissue dysfunction. This study investigates the relationship between inflammatory indices and MAFLD in hypertensive patients and assesses the predictive accuracy of these indices for MAFLD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a cross-sectional analysis involving 34,303 hypertensive patients from a Chinese hospital-based registry. The diagnosis of MAFLD was established using metabolic dysfunction criteria alongside evidence of hepatic steatosis confirmed through imaging. Complete blood counts were used to calculate inflammatory indices, including the monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio (MLR), neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), systemic inflammatory response index (SIRI), systemic immune-inflammation index (SII), and aggregate index of systemic inflammation (AISI). To assess the relationship between inflammatory indices and MAFLD, multivariable logistic regression was performed with adjustments for potential confounders. The diagnostic performance of these indices was analyzed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and area under the curve (AUC) calculations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients with MAFLD exhibited significantly elevated levels of all inflammatory indices compared to those without. After multivariable adjustment, each standard deviation increase in AISI, SIRI, and SII was associated with a 74%, 62%, and 58% increased odds of MAFLD, respectively. The AUC for AISI was 0.659, indicating moderate diagnostic accuracy. The AUCs for SIRI and SII were 0.626 and 0.619, respectively, while NLR, PLR, and MLR had lower AUCs of 0.593, 0.558, and 0.589, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In hypertensive patients, inflammatory indices, especially AISI, show a strong association with MAFLD, indicating their potential utility in risk stratification within clinical settings. Further research is needed to evaluate the effectiveness of these markers in the management of MAFLD.</p>","PeriodicalId":16107,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Inflammation Research","volume":"18 ","pages":"1623-1638"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11806676/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Inflammation Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/JIR.S503648","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Hypertension development and progression are largely influenced by inflammation, which plays a critical role by activating the immune system and causing damage to the vascular endothelium. Metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD) is also associated with chronic low-grade inflammation, which drives disease progression via metabolic imbalances and adipose tissue dysfunction. This study investigates the relationship between inflammatory indices and MAFLD in hypertensive patients and assesses the predictive accuracy of these indices for MAFLD.

Methods: We performed a cross-sectional analysis involving 34,303 hypertensive patients from a Chinese hospital-based registry. The diagnosis of MAFLD was established using metabolic dysfunction criteria alongside evidence of hepatic steatosis confirmed through imaging. Complete blood counts were used to calculate inflammatory indices, including the monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio (MLR), neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), systemic inflammatory response index (SIRI), systemic immune-inflammation index (SII), and aggregate index of systemic inflammation (AISI). To assess the relationship between inflammatory indices and MAFLD, multivariable logistic regression was performed with adjustments for potential confounders. The diagnostic performance of these indices was analyzed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and area under the curve (AUC) calculations.

Results: Patients with MAFLD exhibited significantly elevated levels of all inflammatory indices compared to those without. After multivariable adjustment, each standard deviation increase in AISI, SIRI, and SII was associated with a 74%, 62%, and 58% increased odds of MAFLD, respectively. The AUC for AISI was 0.659, indicating moderate diagnostic accuracy. The AUCs for SIRI and SII were 0.626 and 0.619, respectively, while NLR, PLR, and MLR had lower AUCs of 0.593, 0.558, and 0.589, respectively.

Conclusion: In hypertensive patients, inflammatory indices, especially AISI, show a strong association with MAFLD, indicating their potential utility in risk stratification within clinical settings. Further research is needed to evaluate the effectiveness of these markers in the management of MAFLD.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
高血压患者的炎症指数和MAFLD患病率:来自中国的大规模横断面分析。
目的:高血压的发生和发展在很大程度上受炎症的影响,炎症通过激活免疫系统和破坏血管内皮起着至关重要的作用。代谢功能障碍相关的脂肪性肝病(MAFLD)也与慢性低度炎症相关,慢性低度炎症通过代谢失衡和脂肪组织功能障碍驱动疾病进展。本研究探讨了高血压患者炎症指标与MAFLD的关系,并评估了这些指标对MAFLD的预测准确性。方法:我们对来自中国医院的34303例高血压患者进行了横断面分析。MAFLD的诊断是根据代谢功能障碍标准和肝脏脂肪变性的证据通过影像学证实。采用全血计数计算炎症指数,包括单核细胞与淋巴细胞比值(MLR)、中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值(NLR)、血小板与淋巴细胞比值(PLR)、全身炎症反应指数(SIRI)、全身免疫炎症指数(SII)和全身炎症聚集指数(AISI)。为了评估炎症指标与MAFLD之间的关系,我们进行了多变量逻辑回归,并对潜在的混杂因素进行了调整。采用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线和曲线下面积(AUC)计算分析这些指标的诊断效能。结果:与非MAFLD患者相比,MAFLD患者的所有炎症指标水平均显著升高。多变量调整后,AISI、SIRI和SII每增加一个标准差,MAFLD的几率分别增加74%、62%和58%。AISI的AUC为0.659,诊断准确性中等。SIRI和SII的auc分别为0.626和0.619,NLR、PLR和MLR的auc较低,分别为0.593、0.558和0.589。结论:在高血压患者中,炎症指数,尤其是AISI,显示出与MAFLD密切相关,这表明它们在临床环境中具有潜在的风险分层作用。需要进一步的研究来评估这些标记物在治疗mald中的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Inflammation Research
Journal of Inflammation Research Immunology and Microbiology-Immunology
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
2.20%
发文量
658
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: An international, peer-reviewed, open access, online journal that welcomes laboratory and clinical findings on the molecular basis, cell biology and pharmacology of inflammation.
期刊最新文献
Long-Acting Muscarinic Antagonists for the Treatment of Difficult-to-Treat and Severe Asthma: A Narrative Review Focusing on Inflammation from Bench to Bedside. First-Line Guselkumab Combined with Exclusive Enteral Nutrition in Biologic-Naïve Young‑Onset Crohn's Disease: A Three-Case Series from China. Hyperoside Attenuates Lupus Nephritis-Associated Mesangial Cell Apoptosis via the P53/XAF1 Pathway: Integrative Bioinformatics and In Vitro Validation. Integrated Transcriptomic Analysis Unveils Hub Genes and Immune Dysregulation in Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria Pathogenesis. Celastrol Mitigates Acute Pancreatitis Associated Inflammation by Modulating the IL-34/CSF-1R Axis and Suppressing NF-κB/ERK Signaling.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1