Mentees perception of Formal Mentorship at public sector Medical School, Pakistan.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences Pub Date : 2025-02-01 DOI:10.12669/pjms.41.2.11055
Tayyiba Wasim, Fatima Haroon, Afshan Shahid, Anaab Wasim
{"title":"Mentees perception of Formal Mentorship at public sector Medical School, Pakistan.","authors":"Tayyiba Wasim, Fatima Haroon, Afshan Shahid, Anaab Wasim","doi":"10.12669/pjms.41.2.11055","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate medical students' experiences with mentors along with strengths and limitations of the first formal mentorship program at Medical School.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross sectional study was conducted at Services Institute of Medical Sciences, a public sector medical college in Lahore. The mentoring program was planned and implemented for first time from January 2022 to November 2022 for MBBS students. Mentors were faculty members who received training prior to the program. Mentorship session of two hours every month was included in timetable. After the successful completion of one year of the program, the feedback questionnaire was filled by mentees about their perceptions about mentors and mentorship program and analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 362 students gave feedback. The findings highlight that 327/362 (90.3%) of students had positive experiences with their mentors, particularly in areas of mentor accessibility, confidence building, learning ethical behavior, how to study smart, professionalism, psychological support and communication skills. There were five key strengths identified by student responses including personal development and support 141(40%), better communication and interaction 131(35%), time and relationships management skills 22(6%) and professional guidance 10(3%). Around 107(29%) of the students did not perceive any weaknesses in the mentorship program. Half of the respondents expressed concerns about the lack of assurance regarding confidentiality. Around (15.1%) reported hesitancy in communicating within group settings and suggested individual distraction free sessions.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Formal mentorship program is beneficial in personal and professional development of students. A comprehensive framework that ensures confidentiality should be considered to enhance its effectiveness.</p>","PeriodicalId":19958,"journal":{"name":"Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences","volume":"41 2","pages":"488-493"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11803776/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.41.2.11055","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate medical students' experiences with mentors along with strengths and limitations of the first formal mentorship program at Medical School.

Methods: This cross sectional study was conducted at Services Institute of Medical Sciences, a public sector medical college in Lahore. The mentoring program was planned and implemented for first time from January 2022 to November 2022 for MBBS students. Mentors were faculty members who received training prior to the program. Mentorship session of two hours every month was included in timetable. After the successful completion of one year of the program, the feedback questionnaire was filled by mentees about their perceptions about mentors and mentorship program and analyzed.

Results: A total of 362 students gave feedback. The findings highlight that 327/362 (90.3%) of students had positive experiences with their mentors, particularly in areas of mentor accessibility, confidence building, learning ethical behavior, how to study smart, professionalism, psychological support and communication skills. There were five key strengths identified by student responses including personal development and support 141(40%), better communication and interaction 131(35%), time and relationships management skills 22(6%) and professional guidance 10(3%). Around 107(29%) of the students did not perceive any weaknesses in the mentorship program. Half of the respondents expressed concerns about the lack of assurance regarding confidentiality. Around (15.1%) reported hesitancy in communicating within group settings and suggested individual distraction free sessions.

Conclusion: Formal mentorship program is beneficial in personal and professional development of students. A comprehensive framework that ensures confidentiality should be considered to enhance its effectiveness.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
学员对巴基斯坦公立医学院正式指导的看法。
目的:评价医学生与导师相处的经历以及医学院第一个正式导师项目的优势和局限性。方法:本横断面研究在拉合尔公立医学院服务医学研究所进行。该指导计划于2022年1月至2022年11月首次针对MBBS学生进行规划和实施。导师是在项目之前接受过培训的教员。每月两小时的辅导时间被列入时间表。在成功完成一年的导师项目后,由学员填写反馈问卷,了解他们对导师和导师项目的看法,并进行分析。结果:共有362名学生反馈。调查结果强调,327/362(90.3%)的学生对导师有积极的体验,特别是在导师可及性、建立信心、学习道德行为、如何学习聪明、专业精神、心理支持和沟通技巧等方面。学生的回答确定了五个主要优势,包括个人发展和支持141(40%),更好的沟通和互动131(35%),时间和关系管理技能22(6%)和专业指导10(3%)。约有107名(29%)的学生认为师徒计划没有任何弱点。一半的受访者对缺乏保密保证表示担忧。大约(15.1%)的人报告说,在群体环境中沟通犹豫不决,并建议单独进行无干扰的会议。结论:正式的师徒计划有利于学生的个人和专业发展。应考虑建立一个确保保密的全面框架,以提高其有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences
Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
9.10%
发文量
363
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: It is a peer reviewed medical journal published regularly since 1984. It was previously known as quarterly "SPECIALIST" till December 31st 1999. It publishes original research articles, review articles, current practices, short communications & case reports. It attracts manuscripts not only from within Pakistan but also from over fifty countries from abroad. Copies of PJMS are sent to all the import medical libraries all over Pakistan and overseas particularly in South East Asia and Asia Pacific besides WHO EMRO Region countries. Eminent members of the medical profession at home and abroad regularly contribute their write-ups, manuscripts in our publications. We pursue an independent editorial policy, which allows an opportunity to the healthcare professionals to express their views without any fear or favour. That is why many opinion makers among the medical and pharmaceutical profession use this publication to communicate their viewpoint.
期刊最新文献
Maternal perspective on requesting elective caesarean birth. Morphometric analysis of retroperitoneal organs in individuals with unilateral congenital renal agenesis and renal hypoplasia. Outcome of neurosurgical patients in surgical intensive care unit of a tertiary care center. Outcomes of preoperative medical consultations for elective non cardiac surgical procedures at tertiary care center. Successful anesthetic management of >10-liter blood loss in a Budd-Chiari syndrome patient undergoing living donor liver transplantation: A case report and review of literature.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1