Robot-Assisted Screw Fixation Combined With Endoscopic Bone Graft in the Minimally Invasive Treatment of Lumbar Spondylolysis: A Single-Center Retrospective Study.

IF 2.5 2区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS Orthopaedic Surgery Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-09 DOI:10.1111/os.14368
Guanjie Zeng, Zongze Li, Juedong Hou, Liu Yu, Yuhui Cui, Yongjian Zhu, Ling Yao, Jiarui Chen, Yongquan Cheng, Jianting Chen
{"title":"Robot-Assisted Screw Fixation Combined With Endoscopic Bone Graft in the Minimally Invasive Treatment of Lumbar Spondylolysis: A Single-Center Retrospective Study.","authors":"Guanjie Zeng, Zongze Li, Juedong Hou, Liu Yu, Yuhui Cui, Yongjian Zhu, Ling Yao, Jiarui Chen, Yongquan Cheng, Jianting Chen","doi":"10.1111/os.14368","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Spondylolysis, often progressing to spondylolisthesis, commonly defies conservative treatment in refractory cases, indicating a need for surgery. Robot-assisted techniques may provide a stable and effective minimally invasive approach for the treatment of lumbar spondylolysis. To compare the clinical efficacy between robot-assisted percutaneous screw fixation combined with endoscopic bone graft and conventional open screw fixation with bone graft in the treatment of lumbar spondylolysis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cohort study involving 43 individuals with lumbar spondylolysis who underwent surgical treatment was conducted. From January 2022 to June 2023, 20 patients underwent percutaneous screw fixation combined with endoscopic bone graft while 23 patients underwent conventional open screw fixation with bone graft. The demographic data, parameters related to robotic surgery, perioperative indicators, VAS and ODI scores, pedicle screw accuracy, radiographic fusion outcomes, and follow-up results were systematically recorded, analyzed, and then compared between the two groups. Categorical variables were analyzed using chi-square tests, and continuous variables were evaluated with t-tests or Mann-Whitney U tests following normality assessment, with statistical significance at p < 0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared with the conventional surgery group, the robot-assisted surgery group had significantly less intraoperative blood loss, less postoperative drainage, shorter hospital stay, less intraoperative fluoroscopy times, and radiation exposure dose (p < 0.05). Nevertheless, the duration of the surgery was longer. Postoperative imaging findings showed high screw accuracy in both groups, with a grade A rate of 95% in the robot-assisted group compared with 91.4% in the conventional open surgery group according to the Gertzbein-Robbins scale. Both groups achieved similar improvements in VAS and ODI during 1-year follow-up, and both groups achieved good bone graft fusion (97.5% fusion rate in the robot-assisted group versus 93.5% in the conventional open surgery group).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Robot-assisted screw fixation combined with endoscopic bone graft provides a safe and reliable minimally invasive treatment of lumbar spondylolysis, with high accuracy of pedicle screw implantation and less radiation exposure dose, less intraoperative trauma, and quicker recovery than conventional open surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":19566,"journal":{"name":"Orthopaedic Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"1143-1151"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11962271/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Orthopaedic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/os.14368","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Spondylolysis, often progressing to spondylolisthesis, commonly defies conservative treatment in refractory cases, indicating a need for surgery. Robot-assisted techniques may provide a stable and effective minimally invasive approach for the treatment of lumbar spondylolysis. To compare the clinical efficacy between robot-assisted percutaneous screw fixation combined with endoscopic bone graft and conventional open screw fixation with bone graft in the treatment of lumbar spondylolysis.

Methods: A cohort study involving 43 individuals with lumbar spondylolysis who underwent surgical treatment was conducted. From January 2022 to June 2023, 20 patients underwent percutaneous screw fixation combined with endoscopic bone graft while 23 patients underwent conventional open screw fixation with bone graft. The demographic data, parameters related to robotic surgery, perioperative indicators, VAS and ODI scores, pedicle screw accuracy, radiographic fusion outcomes, and follow-up results were systematically recorded, analyzed, and then compared between the two groups. Categorical variables were analyzed using chi-square tests, and continuous variables were evaluated with t-tests or Mann-Whitney U tests following normality assessment, with statistical significance at p < 0.05.

Results: Compared with the conventional surgery group, the robot-assisted surgery group had significantly less intraoperative blood loss, less postoperative drainage, shorter hospital stay, less intraoperative fluoroscopy times, and radiation exposure dose (p < 0.05). Nevertheless, the duration of the surgery was longer. Postoperative imaging findings showed high screw accuracy in both groups, with a grade A rate of 95% in the robot-assisted group compared with 91.4% in the conventional open surgery group according to the Gertzbein-Robbins scale. Both groups achieved similar improvements in VAS and ODI during 1-year follow-up, and both groups achieved good bone graft fusion (97.5% fusion rate in the robot-assisted group versus 93.5% in the conventional open surgery group).

Conclusion: Robot-assisted screw fixation combined with endoscopic bone graft provides a safe and reliable minimally invasive treatment of lumbar spondylolysis, with high accuracy of pedicle screw implantation and less radiation exposure dose, less intraoperative trauma, and quicker recovery than conventional open surgery.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
机器人辅助螺钉固定联合内镜下植骨微创治疗腰椎峡部裂:一项单中心回顾性研究
目的:峡部裂通常进展为滑脱,在难治性病例中,保守治疗通常无效,表明需要手术治疗。机器人辅助技术可以为腰椎峡部裂的治疗提供稳定有效的微创方法。比较机器人辅助下经皮螺钉内固定联合内镜下植骨与传统的开放式螺钉内固定联合植骨治疗腰椎峡部裂的临床疗效。方法:对43例接受手术治疗的腰椎峡部裂患者进行队列研究。2022年1月至2023年6月,20例患者行经皮螺钉内固定联合内镜下植骨术,23例患者行常规开放螺钉内固定联合植骨术。系统记录两组患者的人口学资料、机器人手术相关参数、围手术期指标、VAS和ODI评分、椎弓根螺钉准确性、影像学融合结果及随访结果,并进行分析比较。分类变量采用卡方检验分析,连续变量采用正态性评估后的t检验或Mann-Whitney U检验评价,p值为统计学意义。结果:与常规手术组相比,机器人辅助手术组术中出血量、术后引流量少、住院时间短、术中透视次数少、辐射暴露剂量少(p)。机器人辅助螺钉固定联合内镜下植骨是一种安全可靠的腰椎峡部裂的微创治疗方法,与传统开放手术相比,椎弓根螺钉植入精度高,辐射暴露剂量小,术中创伤小,恢复快。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Orthopaedic Surgery
Orthopaedic Surgery ORTHOPEDICS-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
14.30%
发文量
374
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: Orthopaedic Surgery (OS) is the official journal of the Chinese Orthopaedic Association, focusing on all aspects of orthopaedic technique and surgery. The journal publishes peer-reviewed articles in the following categories: Original Articles, Clinical Articles, Review Articles, Guidelines, Editorials, Commentaries, Surgical Techniques, Case Reports and Meeting Reports.
期刊最新文献
Development and Internal Evaluation of a Biomarker-Based Model for Preoperative Diagnosis of Infectious Nonunion. Three-Dimensional Estimation of the Femoral Head Center From Trochanteric Landmarks in Japanese Female Patients With Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip. Clinical Study of Ultrasound-Guided Modified Percutaneous Endoscopic Interlaminar Discectomy Combined With Medical Chitosan in Lumbar 4-5 Disc Herniation Treatment. Effect of Medial Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty on Clinical Outcomes and Stress Distribution of Patellofemoral Joint. A Novel 3D-Printed Strut-Type Prosthesis Reconstructs the Hemicortical Defect After Distal Femur Parosteal Osteosarcoma Resection: The Mid-Term Follow-Up Outcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1